-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Description
Epic 5: Quality Validation & Testing
Status: Not Started
Priority: Critical
Epic Owner: QA/Frontend Team
Estimated Tasks: 9
Depends On: Epic 4 (Code Generation)
Overview
Build automated quality validation system that ensures every generated component meets accessibility standards, type safety requirements, code quality guidelines, and design token adherence. Includes auto-fix capabilities with retry logic and comprehensive quality reporting.
Goals
- Validate TypeScript compilation (strict mode)
- Run ESLint and Prettier validation
- Execute axe-core accessibility testing (0 critical violations)
- Test keyboard navigation and focus management
- Verify focus indicators are visible
- Check color contrast compliance (WCAG AA)
- Calculate token adherence meter (≥90% target)
- Implement auto-fix with single retry for failures
- Generate comprehensive quality reports
Success Criteria
- ✅ TypeScript strict compilation succeeds (required)
- ✅ ESLint validation passes with zero errors
- ✅ Prettier formatting verified
- ✅ axe-core audit shows 0 critical violations (required)
- ✅ 0 serious violations (required)
- ✅ Keyboard navigation works (Tab, Enter, Space, Escape)
- ✅ Focus indicators visible with ≥3:1 contrast
- ✅ Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
- ✅ Token adherence ≥90% (colors, typography, spacing)
- ✅ Auto-fix resolves 80%+ of fixable issues
- ✅ Quality report generated with all metrics
- ✅ Validation completes in <10s
Tasks
Task 1: TypeScript Compilation Check
Acceptance Criteria:
- Run
tsc --noEmiton generated component - Use strict mode configuration:
strict: truenoImplicitAny: truestrictNullChecks: truenoUnusedLocals: truenoUnusedParameters: true
- Capture compilation errors with line numbers
- Parse error messages for actionable feedback
- Return detailed error report if compilation fails
- Auto-fix: Remove unused imports, add missing type annotations
- Retry compilation after auto-fix
- Block component delivery if compilation fails after retry
Files:
backend/src/validation/typescript_validator.pybackend/tsconfig.validation.json
TypeScript Validation:
import asyncio
import json
from pathlib import Path
class TypeScriptValidator:
def __init__(self, tsconfig_path: str):
self.tsconfig_path = tsconfig_path
async def validate(self, code: str, file_path: str) -> dict:
"""Validate TypeScript compilation."""
# Write code to temp file
temp_file = Path(f"/tmp/{file_path}")
temp_file.write_text(code)
# Run tsc
result = await self._run_tsc(temp_file)
if result["success"]:
return {
"valid": True,
"errors": []
}
# Attempt auto-fix
fixed_code = await self._auto_fix(code, result["errors"])
if fixed_code:
retry_result = await self._run_tsc_on_code(fixed_code)
if retry_result["success"]:
return {
"valid": True,
"auto_fixed": True,
"fixed_code": fixed_code
}
return {
"valid": False,
"errors": result["errors"],
"auto_fix_attempted": True
}
async def _run_tsc(self, file_path: Path) -> dict:
"""Run TypeScript compiler."""
process = await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
'npx', 'tsc', '--noEmit',
'--project', self.tsconfig_path,
str(file_path),
stdout=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE
)
stdout, stderr = await process.communicate()
if process.returncode == 0:
return {"success": True, "errors": []}
errors = self._parse_tsc_errors(stderr.decode())
return {"success": False, "errors": errors}
def _parse_tsc_errors(self, output: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Parse TypeScript compiler errors."""
errors = []
for line in output.split('\n'):
if ': error TS' in line:
parts = line.split(':')
errors.append({
"line": parts[1].strip() if len(parts) > 1 else None,
"code": self._extract_error_code(line),
"message": self._extract_error_message(line)
})
return errors
async def _auto_fix(self, code: str, errors: list[dict]) -> str | None:
"""Attempt to auto-fix common TypeScript errors."""
# Remove unused imports
if any('is declared but never used' in e['message'] for e in errors):
code = self._remove_unused_imports(code)
# Add missing type annotations
if any('implicitly has an' in e['message'] for e in errors):
code = self._add_type_annotations(code)
return codeTests:
- Valid TypeScript compiles successfully
- Compilation errors detected correctly
- Auto-fix removes unused imports
- Auto-fix adds type annotations
- Retry logic works
Task 2: ESLint & Prettier Validation
Acceptance Criteria:
- Run ESLint with TypeScript parser
- Use recommended rulesets:
eslint:recommendedplugin:@typescript-eslint/recommendedplugin:react/recommendedplugin:react-hooks/recommended
- Check code formatting with Prettier
- Report errors by severity (error, warning)
- Auto-fix: Run
eslint --fixandprettier --write - Retry validation after auto-fix
- Allow warnings but block on errors
- Generate formatted code output
Files:
backend/src/validation/eslint_validator.pybackend/.eslintrc.jsonbackend/.prettierrc.json
ESLint Validation:
class ESLintValidator:
async def validate(self, code: str, file_path: str) -> dict:
"""Validate code with ESLint and Prettier."""
# Write to temp file
temp_file = Path(f"/tmp/{file_path}")
temp_file.write_text(code)
# Run ESLint
eslint_result = await self._run_eslint(temp_file)
if not eslint_result["valid"]:
# Attempt auto-fix
await self._run_eslint_fix(temp_file)
fixed_code = temp_file.read_text()
# Retry validation
retry_result = await self._run_eslint(temp_file)
eslint_result = retry_result
eslint_result["fixed_code"] = fixed_code
# Run Prettier
prettier_result = await self._run_prettier(temp_file)
return {
"eslint": eslint_result,
"prettier": prettier_result
}
async def _run_eslint(self, file_path: Path) -> dict:
"""Run ESLint on file."""
process = await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
'npx', 'eslint',
'--format', 'json',
str(file_path),
stdout=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE
)
stdout, stderr = await process.communicate()
if process.returncode == 0:
return {"valid": True, "errors": [], "warnings": []}
results = json.loads(stdout.decode())
errors = [m for m in results[0]['messages']
if m['severity'] == 2]
warnings = [m for m in results[0]['messages']
if m['severity'] == 1]
return {
"valid": len(errors) == 0,
"errors": errors,
"warnings": warnings
}
async def _run_eslint_fix(self, file_path: Path):
"""Run ESLint with --fix."""
await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
'npx', 'eslint', '--fix', str(file_path)
)
async def _run_prettier(self, file_path: Path) -> dict:
"""Check Prettier formatting."""
process = await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
'npx', 'prettier', '--check', str(file_path),
stdout=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE
)
await process.communicate()
if process.returncode == 0:
return {"valid": True}
# Auto-fix: format with Prettier
await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
'npx', 'prettier', '--write', str(file_path)
)
return {"valid": True, "auto_fixed": True}Tests:
- ESLint detects errors correctly
- ESLint auto-fix resolves issues
- Prettier formatting works
- Auto-fix and retry logic correct
Task 3: axe-core Accessibility Testing
Acceptance Criteria:
- Render component in headless browser (Playwright)
- Run axe-core accessibility audit
- Test all component variants and states
- Report violations by severity:
- Critical (0 allowed)
- Serious (0 allowed)
- Moderate (warn only)
- Minor (warn only)
- Capture violation details:
- Rule ID (e.g.,
button-name,color-contrast) - Impact level
- Element selector
- Fix suggestions
- Rule ID (e.g.,
- Block component delivery on critical/serious violations
- Generate accessibility report
Files:
backend/src/validation/a11y_validator.py
axe-core Validation:
from playwright.async_api import async_playwright
import json
class A11yValidator:
async def validate(self, component_code: str,
component_name: str) -> dict:
"""Run axe-core accessibility tests."""
async with async_playwright() as p:
browser = await p.chromium.launch()
page = await browser.new_page()
# Create test page with component
html = self._create_test_page(component_code, component_name)
await page.set_content(html)
# Inject axe-core
await page.add_script_tag(
url='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/axe-core/4.7.0/axe.min.js'
)
# Run axe
results = await page.evaluate('axe.run()')
await browser.close()
return self._process_results(results)
def _create_test_page(self, component_code: str,
component_name: str) -> str:
"""Create HTML page for testing."""
return f"""
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>A11y Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="root"></div>
<script type="module">
{component_code}
// Render all variants
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import {{ {component_name} }} from './component';
ReactDOM.render(
<div>
<{component_name} variant="primary">Primary</{component_name}>
<{component_name} variant="secondary">Secondary</{component_name}>
<{component_name} disabled>Disabled</{component_name}>
</div>,
document.getElementById('root')
);
</script>
</body>
</html>
"""
def _process_results(self, results: dict) -> dict:
"""Process axe-core results."""
violations = results.get('violations', [])
critical = [v for v in violations if v['impact'] == 'critical']
serious = [v for v in violations if v['impact'] == 'serious']
moderate = [v for v in violations if v['impact'] == 'moderate']
minor = [v for v in violations if v['impact'] == 'minor']
return {
"valid": len(critical) == 0 and len(serious) == 0,
"violations": {
"critical": critical,
"serious": serious,
"moderate": moderate,
"minor": minor
},
"summary": {
"critical_count": len(critical),
"serious_count": len(serious),
"moderate_count": len(moderate),
"minor_count": len(minor),
"total_count": len(violations)
}
}Tests:
- axe-core detects violations
- Critical violations block delivery
- All variants tested
- Report format correct
Task 4: Keyboard Navigation Testing
Acceptance Criteria:
- Test Tab key navigation through interactive elements
- Verify correct tab order
- Test Enter/Space activation for buttons
- Test Escape key for dismissible components
- Test Arrow keys for navigation (tabs, select, etc.)
- Verify focus trap for modals
- Test skip links if present
- Ensure no keyboard traps
- Report keyboard navigation issues
Files:
backend/src/validation/keyboard_validator.py
Keyboard Testing:
class KeyboardValidator:
async def validate(self, component_code: str,
component_name: str,
component_type: str) -> dict:
"""Test keyboard navigation."""
async with async_playwright() as p:
browser = await p.chromium.launch()
page = await browser.new_page()
html = self._create_test_page(component_code, component_name)
await page.set_content(html)
issues = []
# Test Tab navigation
tab_issues = await self._test_tab_navigation(page, component_type)
issues.extend(tab_issues)
# Test activation keys (Enter/Space)
if component_type in ['button', 'link']:
activation_issues = await self._test_activation(page)
issues.extend(activation_issues)
await browser.close()
return {
"valid": len(issues) == 0,
"issues": issues
}
async def _test_tab_navigation(self, page, component_type: str):
"""Test Tab key navigation."""
issues = []
# Press Tab
await page.keyboard.press('Tab')
# Check if component received focus
focused = await page.evaluate('document.activeElement.tagName')
if component_type == 'button' and focused != 'BUTTON':
issues.append({
"type": "tab_navigation",
"message": "Button not focusable with Tab key",
"severity": "critical"
})
return issues
async def _test_activation(self, page):
"""Test Enter/Space activation."""
issues = []
# Setup click listener
await page.evaluate('''
window.clicked = false;
document.activeElement.addEventListener('click', () => {
window.clicked = true;
});
''')
# Press Enter
await page.keyboard.press('Enter')
clicked = await page.evaluate('window.clicked')
if not clicked:
issues.append({
"type": "keyboard_activation",
"message": "Element not activated by Enter key",
"severity": "serious"
})
return issuesTests:
- Tab navigation works correctly
- Enter/Space activates elements
- Keyboard traps detected
- Focus order validated
Task 5: Focus Indicator Validation
Acceptance Criteria:
- Verify focus indicator is visible
- Check focus indicator contrast (≥3:1 against background)
- Test focus indicator on all interactive elements
- Verify focus-visible styles applied
- Check focus indicator is not removed with
outline: none - Ensure custom focus styles meet WCAG standards
- Test focus indicator in different states (hover, active)
- Report missing or insufficient focus indicators
Files:
backend/src/validation/focus_validator.py
Focus Indicator Testing:
class FocusValidator:
async def validate(self, component_code: str,
component_name: str) -> dict:
"""Validate focus indicators."""
async with async_playwright() as p:
browser = await p.chromium.launch()
page = await browser.new_page()
html = self._create_test_page(component_code, component_name)
await page.set_content(html)
# Focus element
await page.keyboard.press('Tab')
# Get computed styles
styles = await page.evaluate('''
() => {
const el = document.activeElement;
const computed = window.getComputedStyle(el);
return {
outline: computed.outline,
outlineWidth: computed.outlineWidth,
outlineColor: computed.outlineColor,
boxShadow: computed.boxShadow
};
}
''')
# Check for focus indicator
has_indicator = (
styles['outlineWidth'] != '0px' or
'ring' in styles['boxShadow']
)
issues = []
if not has_indicator:
issues.append({
"type": "missing_focus_indicator",
"message": "No visible focus indicator detected",
"severity": "critical"
})
# Check contrast if indicator present
if has_indicator:
contrast_issues = await self._check_focus_contrast(page)
issues.extend(contrast_issues)
await browser.close()
return {
"valid": len(issues) == 0,
"issues": issues,
"styles": styles
}
async def _check_focus_contrast(self, page):
"""Check focus indicator contrast ratio."""
# Get colors and calculate contrast
# Implementation depends on color parsing library
passTests:
- Focus indicators detected
- Contrast ratio calculated correctly
- Missing indicators reported
- Custom focus styles validated
Task 6: Color Contrast Validation
Acceptance Criteria:
- Extract all text and UI element colors from component
- Calculate contrast ratios using WCAG formula
- Validate against WCAG AA standards:
- Normal text: ≥4.5:1
- Large text (≥18pt or 14pt bold): ≥3:1
- UI components: ≥3:1
- Test contrast in all states (default, hover, focus, disabled)
- Report violations with actual vs required ratios
- Suggest alternative colors that meet standards
- Auto-fix: Adjust colors to meet minimum contrast
Files:
backend/src/validation/contrast_validator.py
Contrast Validation:
from colour import Color
import math
class ContrastValidator:
def validate(self, component_code: str, tokens: dict) -> dict:
"""Validate color contrast ratios."""
violations = []
# Extract color pairs from component
color_pairs = self._extract_color_pairs(component_code, tokens)
for pair in color_pairs:
ratio = self._calculate_contrast_ratio(
pair['foreground'],
pair['background']
)
required_ratio = self._get_required_ratio(pair['context'])
if ratio < required_ratio:
violations.append({
"type": "insufficient_contrast",
"element": pair['element'],
"foreground": pair['foreground'],
"background": pair['background'],
"actual_ratio": round(ratio, 2),
"required_ratio": required_ratio,
"severity": "critical" if ratio < 3.0 else "serious"
})
return {
"valid": len(violations) == 0,
"violations": violations
}
def _calculate_contrast_ratio(self, fg: str, bg: str) -> float:
"""Calculate WCAG contrast ratio."""
fg_color = Color(fg)
bg_color = Color(bg)
fg_luminance = self._get_relative_luminance(fg_color)
bg_luminance = self._get_relative_luminance(bg_color)
lighter = max(fg_luminance, bg_luminance)
darker = min(fg_luminance, bg_luminance)
return (lighter + 0.05) / (darker + 0.05)
def _get_relative_luminance(self, color: Color) -> float:
"""Calculate relative luminance."""
r, g, b = color.rgb
def adjust(c):
if c <= 0.03928:
return c / 12.92
return ((c + 0.055) / 1.055) ** 2.4
r = adjust(r)
g = adjust(g)
b = adjust(b)
return 0.2126 * r + 0.7152 * g + 0.0722 * b
def _get_required_ratio(self, context: str) -> float:
"""Get required contrast ratio for context."""
if context == 'large_text':
return 3.0
elif context == 'ui_component':
return 3.0
else: # normal_text
return 4.5
def _extract_color_pairs(self, code: str, tokens: dict):
"""Extract foreground/background color pairs from code."""
# Parse code to find text elements and their colors
pairs = []
# Implementation depends on AST parsing
return pairsTests:
- Contrast ratios calculated correctly
- WCAG standards enforced
- Violations detected accurately
- Auto-fix suggestions valid
Task 7: Token Adherence Meter
Acceptance Criteria:
- Compare generated component against approved tokens
- Check token usage for:
- Colors (all color values)
- Typography (font family, sizes, weights)
- Spacing (padding, margin, gap values)
- Calculate adherence percentage per category
- Calculate overall adherence score (≥90% target)
- Report non-compliant values with expected vs actual
- Generate visual adherence report
- Allow tolerance for minor variations (ΔE ≤2 for colors)
Files:
backend/src/validation/token_validator.py
Token Adherence:
class TokenValidator:
def validate(self, component_code: str, approved_tokens: dict) -> dict:
"""Calculate token adherence."""
# Extract tokens from generated code
used_tokens = self._extract_used_tokens(component_code)
adherence = {
"colors": self._check_color_adherence(
used_tokens.get("colors", {}),
approved_tokens.get("colors", {})
),
"typography": self._check_typography_adherence(
used_tokens.get("typography", {}),
approved_tokens.get("typography", {})
),
"spacing": self._check_spacing_adherence(
used_tokens.get("spacing", {}),
approved_tokens.get("spacing", {})
)
}
# Calculate overall score
scores = [cat["score"] for cat in adherence.values()]
overall_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
return {
"valid": overall_score >= 0.90,
"overall_score": overall_score,
"adherence": adherence,
"violations": self._collect_violations(adherence)
}
def _check_color_adherence(self, used: dict, approved: dict) -> dict:
"""Check color token adherence."""
matches = 0
total = len(used)
violations = []
for name, used_value in used.items():
approved_value = approved.get(name)
if not approved_value:
violations.append({
"token": name,
"issue": "not_in_approved_tokens",
"used": used_value
})
continue
# Calculate color difference (ΔE)
delta_e = self._calculate_delta_e(used_value, approved_value)
if delta_e <= 2.0: # Tolerance
matches += 1
else:
violations.append({
"token": name,
"issue": "color_mismatch",
"used": used_value,
"approved": approved_value,
"delta_e": round(delta_e, 2)
})
return {
"score": matches / total if total > 0 else 1.0,
"matches": matches,
"total": total,
"violations": violations
}
def _calculate_delta_e(self, color1: str, color2: str) -> float:
"""Calculate ΔE color difference (CIEDE2000)."""
# Use colour library for ΔE calculation
from colour import delta_E
return delta_E(color1, color2, method='CIE 2000')
def _extract_used_tokens(self, code: str) -> dict:
"""Extract token values from generated code."""
# Parse CSS variables and inline values
# Implementation depends on CSS parser
return {}Tests:
- Token extraction correct
- Adherence calculated accurately
- ΔE tolerance works
- Overall score matches expectations
Task 8: Auto-Fix & Retry Logic
Acceptance Criteria:
- Implement auto-fix for common issues:
- TypeScript: Remove unused imports, add type annotations
- ESLint: Run
eslint --fix - Prettier: Run
prettier --write - Accessibility: Add missing ARIA labels
- Contrast: Adjust colors to meet minimum ratios
- Retry validation after auto-fix (one attempt)
- Track which issues were auto-fixed
- Report auto-fix success rate
- Generate diff showing changes
- Provide manual fix suggestions for unfixable issues
- Target: 80%+ auto-fix success rate
Files:
backend/src/validation/auto_fixer.py
Auto-Fix Logic:
class AutoFixer:
async def fix_and_retry(self, code: str,
validation_result: dict) -> dict:
"""Attempt to auto-fix issues and retry validation."""
fixed_code = code
fixes_applied = []
# Fix TypeScript issues
if not validation_result.get("typescript", {}).get("valid"):
fixed_code, ts_fixes = await self._fix_typescript(
fixed_code,
validation_result["typescript"]["errors"]
)
fixes_applied.extend(ts_fixes)
# Fix ESLint issues
if not validation_result.get("eslint", {}).get("valid"):
fixed_code, lint_fixes = await self._fix_eslint(fixed_code)
fixes_applied.extend(lint_fixes)
# Format with Prettier
fixed_code = await self._format_prettier(fixed_code)
fixes_applied.append("prettier_format")
# Fix accessibility issues
if validation_result.get("a11y", {}).get("violations"):
fixed_code, a11y_fixes = await self._fix_a11y(
fixed_code,
validation_result["a11y"]["violations"]
)
fixes_applied.extend(a11y_fixes)
# Retry validation
retry_result = await self.validator.validate_all(fixed_code)
return {
"fixed_code": fixed_code,
"fixes_applied": fixes_applied,
"retry_result": retry_result,
"success": retry_result["valid"]
}
async def _fix_a11y(self, code: str, violations: dict) -> tuple[str, list]:
"""Fix accessibility violations."""
fixes = []
# Add missing aria-labels
for violation in violations.get("critical", []):
if violation["id"] == "button-name":
# Add aria-label to buttons without text
code = self._add_aria_label(code, violation)
fixes.append("add_aria_label")
return code, fixesTests:
- Auto-fix resolves common issues
- Retry validation works
- Fixes tracked correctly
- Success rate measured
Task 9: Quality Report Generation
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generate comprehensive quality report with:
- Overall pass/fail status
- TypeScript compilation result
- ESLint/Prettier results
- Accessibility audit summary
- Keyboard navigation results
- Focus indicator validation
- Color contrast results
- Token adherence score
- Auto-fix summary
- Include visualizations (charts, badges)
- Export report in JSON and HTML formats
- Store report in S3
- Display report in UI
- Track quality metrics over time
Files:
backend/src/validation/report_generator.py
Report Generation:
class QualityReportGenerator:
def generate(self, validation_results: dict) -> dict:
"""Generate quality report."""
report = {
"timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"overall_status": self._determine_status(validation_results),
"summary": {
"typescript": validation_results["typescript"]["valid"],
"eslint": validation_results["eslint"]["valid"],
"accessibility": validation_results["a11y"]["valid"],
"keyboard": validation_results["keyboard"]["valid"],
"focus": validation_results["focus"]["valid"],
"contrast": validation_results["contrast"]["valid"],
"token_adherence": validation_results["tokens"]["overall_score"]
},
"details": validation_results,
"auto_fixes": validation_results.get("auto_fixes", []),
"recommendations": self._generate_recommendations(validation_results)
}
# Generate HTML report
html_report = self._generate_html(report)
return {
"json": report,
"html": html_report
}
def _determine_status(self, results: dict) -> str:
"""Determine overall pass/fail status."""
critical_checks = [
results["typescript"]["valid"],
results["eslint"]["valid"],
results["a11y"]["valid"]
]
if all(critical_checks) and results["tokens"]["overall_score"] >= 0.90:
return "PASS"
else:
return "FAIL"
def _generate_html(self, report: dict) -> str:
"""Generate HTML quality report."""
# Use Jinja2 template
passTests:
- Reports generated correctly
- JSON and HTML formats valid
- Status determination correct
- Metrics tracked over time
Dependencies
Requires:
- Epic 4: Generated components to validate
Blocks:
- Component delivery (cannot ship without validation)
Technical Architecture
Validation Pipeline
Generated Component Code
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ TypeScript Check │ → Auto-fix → Retry
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ ESLint/Prettier │ → Auto-fix → Retry
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ axe-core A11y Test │ → Auto-fix → Retry
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Keyboard Nav Test │
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Focus Indicator │
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Color Contrast │ → Auto-fix → Retry
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Token Adherence │
└─────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Generate Report │
└─────────────────────┘
↓
Pass / Fail
Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Critical A11y Violations | 0 | axe-core audit |
| Serious A11y Violations | 0 | axe-core audit |
| TypeScript Compilation | 100% pass | tsc --noEmit |
| Token Adherence | ≥90% | Token validator |
| Auto-Fix Success Rate | ≥80% | Fixes resolved / Total issues |
| Validation Latency | <10s | Total validation time |
Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Validation too slow (>10s) | Medium | Parallelize checks, optimize AST operations |
| Auto-fix breaks code | High | Validate after fix, provide manual override |
| False positives in a11y tests | Low | Manual review, adjust rules |
| Token adherence too strict | Low | Allow configurable tolerance |
Definition of Done
- All 9 tasks completed with acceptance criteria met
- TypeScript validation works correctly
- ESLint and Prettier validation functional
- axe-core testing detects violations
- Keyboard navigation tested
- Focus indicators validated
- Color contrast checked (WCAG AA)
- Token adherence meter implemented (≥90%)
- Auto-fix resolves 80%+ of issues
- Quality reports generated
- Validation completes in <10s
- Integration tests passing
- Documentation updated
Related Epics
- Depends On: Epic 4
- Blocks: Component delivery
- Related: Epic 8 (regeneration uses same validation)
Notes
Zero Tolerance: Critical accessibility violations are non-negotiable. No component ships without passing.
Auto-Fix: Focus on high-impact, low-risk fixes. Don't break working code trying to fix minor issues.
Performance: 10s validation target is tight. Parallelize checks where possible.