Skip to content

KIP-22: not following KIP-1 #5

@MASDXI

Description

@MASDXI

The proposal KAP-22 moves to "final" but still missing critical elements and still needs to be shaped, including:

  • RFC 2119 and RFC 8174 in Specification
  • Specification mentions things such as KYC, authentication, and compliance, which are unrelated to the Loyalty Program, should be separated from KAP-22 and addressed as dependencies instead.
  • Rationale Why the KAP-22 uses 'period-based'
  • Backwards Compatibility KAP-20 is a dependency of KAP-22 must be required in the preamble.
  • Reference Implementation
  • Security considerations

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions