Appendix 1 - numbering of subitems of subitem (c)

[HazardJ]

Hi - are the items in the Appendix A that are numbered "3." and "4." intended to be subitems of "(c)"? That seems to make sense, but the numbering is wrong. (Lines 70 and 71.)

[HazardJ]

Ah... I think I understand. The (a), (b), (c) in Line 69 are each at the end of the item that they number. (A style that is rare in English, no?). So the number of "3." and "4." is correct.

[larryflorio]

Agree that it looks a little wonky in a markdown. In the original Word doc version, the lettered items in the Appendix are actually footnotes pointing to a superscript reference in the numbered items

[HazardJ]

Thanks. So ... the letters could be migrated to the front of the lettered items?

[HazardJ]

Looking at those numbers and the rest of the Appendix, it seems to me that they could be reframed as the four substantive items and the rest as a list of Defined Terms. In ProseObjects, we make the {_Defined_Terms} into links to their definitions, and that seems to work well here. I'll do this and post it as an example. http://www.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=doc&file=G/LegalForms/PO/Demo/Acme-Ang_ContributorAgreement_2021-10-11.md#Annex.sec