Excise quippy

[gabor1]

In order to help people adopt this, it would be good to excise quippy from tests and potentials as much as possible. More important to excise it from tests.

[noambernstein]

Keep in mind that this is not the new testing framework, just a slightly cleaned up version of the old Si framework for release with the paper, right? My new refactored framework is separate, and I'm not even sure I gave you a copy. It's certainly not named "silicon-testing-framework". We _still_ need to set a time to meet with anyone who might be interested to deal with that.

…

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:01 PM gabor1 ***@***.***> wrote: In order to help people adopt this, it would be good to excise quippy from tests and potentials as much as possible. More important to excise it from tests. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMLExiXv0fgQGNGuo6QTz2JLlFJqccEWks5uGRjXgaJpZM4VPkCc> .

[gabor1]

Yes, I temporarily forgot - the GitHub version looked very clean :-) I am wanting to use it for other things now, and eventually start to push others to use it too, e.g. I talked to Aidan Thompson about it. Can you share your refactored version ? How were you thinking of releasing it? G

…

On 14 Jul 2018, at 02:24, noambernstein ***@***.***> wrote: Keep in mind that this is not the new testing framework, just a slightly cleaned up version of the old Si framework for release with the paper, right? My new refactored framework is separate, and I'm not even sure I gave you a copy. It's certainly not named "silicon-testing-framework". We _still_ need to set a time to meet with anyone who might be interested to deal with that. On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:01 PM gabor1 ***@***.***> wrote: > In order to help people adopt this, it would be good to excise quippy from > tests and potentials as much as possible. More important to excise it from > tests. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#1>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMLExiXv0fgQGNGuo6QTz2JLlFJqccEWks5uGRjXgaJpZM4VPkCc> > . > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[noambernstein]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 7:24 PM gabor1 ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, I temporarily forgot - the GitHub version looked very clean :-) I am wanting to use it for other things now, and eventually start to push others to use it too, e.g. I talked to Aidan Thompson about it. Can you share your refactored version ? How were you thinking of releasing it?

I could release what I have at any time, but my sense is that it's probably still going to need a lot of changes, so any serious changes I make would then have to be released later. Most sensible thing is probably to share with you + 1-2 more people as a collaboration, and once it's stable then do a real release. Noam

…

[gabor1]

Repo on gc121mac1?

…

-- Gábor

On 15 Jul 2018, at 13:00, noambernstein ***@***.***> wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 7:24 PM gabor1 ***@***.***> wrote: > Yes, I temporarily forgot - the GitHub version looked very clean :-) > > I am wanting to use it for other things now, and eventually start to push > others to use it too, e.g. I talked to Aidan Thompson about it. > > Can you share your refactored version ? How were you thinking of releasing > it? > I could release what I have at any time, but my sense is that it's probably still going to need a lot of changes, so any serious changes I make would then have to be released later. Most sensible thing is probably to share with you + 1-2 more people as a collaboration, and once it's stable then do a real release. Noam > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.