Solve second issue.

Author: shaavan

lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs

@@ -3796,6 +3796,29 @@ pub struct ClaimAlongRouteArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
 	pub origin_node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
 	pub expected_paths: &'a [&'a [&'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>]],
 	pub expected_extra_fees: Vec<u32>,
+	/// A one-off adjustment used only in tests to account for an existing
+	/// fee-handling trade-off in LDK.
+	///
+	/// When the payer is the introduction node of a blinded path, LDK does not
+	/// subtract the forward fee for the `payer -> next_hop` channel
+	/// (see [`BlindedPaymentPath::advance_path_by_one`]). This keeps the fee
+	/// logic simpler at the cost of a small, intentional overpayment.
+	///
+	/// In the simple two-hop case (payer as introduction node → payee),
+	/// this overpayment has historically been avoided by simply not charging
+	/// the payer the forward fee, since the payer knows there is only
+	/// a single hop after them.
+	///
+	/// However, with the introduction of dummy hops in LDK v3.0, even a
+	/// two-node real path (payer as introduction node → payee) may appear as a
+	/// multi-hop blinded path. This makes the existing overpayment surface in
+	/// tests.
+	///
+	/// Until the fee-handling trade-off is revisited, this field allows tests
+	/// to compensate for that expected difference.
+	///
+	/// [`BlindedPaymentPath::advance_path_by_one`]: crate::blinded_path::payment::BlindedPaymentPath::advance_path_by_one
+	pub expected_extra_total_fees_msat: u64,
 	pub expected_min_htlc_overpay: Vec<u32>,
 	pub skip_last: bool,
 	pub payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
@@ -3819,6 +3842,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ClaimAlongRouteArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
 			origin_node,
 			expected_paths,
 			expected_extra_fees: vec![0; expected_paths.len()],
+			expected_extra_total_fees_msat: 0,
 			expected_min_htlc_overpay: vec![0; expected_paths.len()],
 			skip_last: false,
 			payment_preimage,
@@ -3834,6 +3858,10 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ClaimAlongRouteArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
 		self.expected_extra_fees = extra_fees;
 		self
 	}
+	pub fn with_expected_extra_total_fees_msat(mut self, extra_total_fees: u64) -> Self {
+		self.expected_extra_total_fees_msat = extra_total_fees;
+		self
+	}
 	pub fn with_expected_min_htlc_overpay(mut self, extra_fees: Vec<u32>) -> Self {
 		self.expected_min_htlc_overpay = extra_fees;
 		self
@@ -3858,6 +3886,7 @@ pub fn pass_claimed_payment_along_route(args: ClaimAlongRouteArgs) -> u64 {
 		payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage,
 		allow_1_msat_fee_overpay,
 		custom_tlvs,
+		..
 	} = args;
 	let claim_event = expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
 	assert_eq!(claim_event.len(), 1);
@@ -4096,7 +4125,9 @@ pub fn claim_payment_along_route(
 	let origin_node = args.origin_node;
 	let payment_preimage = args.payment_preimage;
 	let skip_last = args.skip_last;
-	let expected_total_fee_msat = do_claim_payment_along_route(args);
+	let expected_extra_total_fees_msat = args.expected_extra_total_fees_msat;
+	let mut expected_total_fee_msat = do_claim_payment_along_route(args);
+	expected_total_fee_msat += expected_extra_total_fees_msat;
 	if !skip_last {
 		expect_payment_sent!(origin_node, payment_preimage, Some(expected_total_fee_msat))
 	} else {

lightning/src/ln/offers_tests.rs

@@ -1410,7 +1410,41 @@ fn creates_offer_with_blinded_path_using_unannounced_introduction_node() {
 	route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice);
 	expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
 
-	claim_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], payment_context, &invoice);
+	// Extract PaymentClaimable, verify context, and obtain the payment preimage.
+	let recipient = &alice;
+	let payment_purpose = match get_event!(recipient, Event::PaymentClaimable) {
+		Event::PaymentClaimable { purpose, .. } => purpose,
+		_ => panic!("No Event::PaymentClaimable"),
+	};
+
+	let payment_preimage = payment_purpose
+		.preimage()
+		.expect("No preimage in Event::PaymentClaimable");
+
+	match payment_purpose {
+		PaymentPurpose::Bolt12OfferPayment { payment_context: ctx, .. } => {
+			assert_eq!(PaymentContext::Bolt12Offer(ctx), payment_context);
+		},
+		PaymentPurpose::Bolt12RefundPayment { payment_context: ctx, .. } => {
+			assert_eq!(PaymentContext::Bolt12Refund(ctx), payment_context);
+		},
+		_ => panic!("Unexpected payment purpose: {:?}", payment_purpose),
+	};
+
+	// Build ClaimAlongRouteArgs and compensate for the expected overpayment
+	// caused by the payer being the introduction node of the blinded path with
+	// dummy hops.
+	let expected_paths: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[alice]];
+	let args = ClaimAlongRouteArgs::new(
+		bob,
+		expected_paths,
+		payment_preimage,
+	).with_expected_extra_total_fees_msat(1000);
+
+	// Execute the claim and verify the invoice was fulfilled.
+	let (inv, _events) = claim_payment_along_route(args);
+	assert_eq!(inv, Some(PaidBolt12Invoice::Bolt12Invoice(invoice.clone())));
+
 	expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Fulfilled, payment_id);
 }