Skip to content

Conversation

@dengzhongyuan365-dev
Copy link
Contributor

  • Removed [!mipsel !mips64el] architecture exclusions from Qt6 and DTK6 dependencies
  • Simplified build dependency declarations to support all architectures

Log: Remove MIPS architecture exclusions from build dependencies

- Removed [!mipsel !mips64el] architecture exclusions from Qt6 and DTK6 dependencies
- Simplified build dependency declarations to support all architectures

Log: Remove MIPS architecture exclusions from build dependencies
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个git diff进行审查:

  1. 语法逻辑:

    • 语法结构正确,符合debian/control文件的格式要求
    • 依赖关系的OR操作符(|)使用正确
  2. 代码质量:

    • 主要变化是移除了[!mipsel !mips64el]的架构限制
    • 格式保持一致,缩进和对齐都保持原样
    • 依赖项的排列顺序保持不变
  3. 代码性能:

    • 这个改动主要影响包的构建依赖,不会直接影响运行时性能
    • 移除架构限制可能会增加包的构建范围
  4. 代码安全:

    • 需要特别注意:移除架构限制可能会带来潜在问题
    • 建议确认以下几点:
      • Qt6和DTK6在mipsel和mips64el架构上是否已经完全支持
      • 这些架构上的依赖包是否已经准备就绪
      • 是否有充分的测试来确保这些架构上的兼容性

改进建议:

  1. 在移除架构限制之前,建议:

    • 进行全面的兼容性测试
    • 确保所有目标架构上的依赖包都已就绪
    • 考虑是否需要添加版本限制
  2. 建议在提交信息中说明:

    • 移除架构限制的原因
    • 相关的测试结果
    • 可能带来的影响
  3. 如果这是一个临时性的改动,建议:

    • 添加TODO注释
    • 记录后续需要跟进的工作
  4. 建议在后续版本中:

    • 监控这些架构上的构建情况
    • 收集用户反馈
    • 必要时重新引入架构限制

总的来说,这个改动在语法上是正确的,但需要谨慎处理架构兼容性问题。建议在实施前进行充分的测试和评估。

@dengzhongyuan365-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dengzhongyuan365-dev, lzwind

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 2, 2025

This pr cannot be merged! (status: unstable)

@dengzhongyuan365-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/forcemerge

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit 77ce4ef into linuxdeepin:master Dec 2, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants