Skip to content

Misleading "supported" table for LUD-01 in README (fallback support) #208

@vindard

Description

@vindard

Description

We've implemented the LNURL fallback scheme with URLs as outlined in LUD-01 but it seems like a number of wallets still haven't implemented this and there's no signal for which ones do.

Should we incorporate this sort of data into the compatibility table somehow as a signal to ones who don't support it yet that they should?

From my testing with the wallets I have access to I came up with the following:

Wallet Name Supports LUD-01 Fallbacks
Alby ✅ Yes
Blink (Bitcoin Beach Wallet) ✅ Yes
Blixt ✅ Yes
BlueWallet ✅ Yes
Breez ✅ Yes
coinos ❌ No (opened issue)
lnbits ❌ No (opened issue)
Muun ❌ No (opened issue)
OBW ✅ Yes
Phoenix iOS ✅ Yes
Phoenix Android ❌ No (opened issue)
Simple Bitcoin Wallet ✅ Yes
Valet ✅ Yes
Wallet of Satoshi ✅ Yes (tweeted, fixed)
Zap Android ❌ No (opened issue)
Zeus ✅ Yes

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions