Skip to content

PRD-Optimization.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (35 loc) · 3.7 KB

PRD-Optimization.md

File metadata and controls

43 lines (35 loc) · 3.7 KB

Phase 5: Optimization Plan

Goal: Ensure the application performs smoothly (load time < 1s, interactions ~60 FPS) when handling a large dataset (10,000+ earthquake points).

Steps:

  1. Data Acquisition & Verification:

    • Action: Check the size of the current earthquake dataset (earthquakes.json or database.csv).
    • Contingency: If the dataset has fewer than 10,000 entries:
      • Source a larger static dataset from public archives (e.g., USGS) matching the required JSON schema specified in the PRD.
      • Alternatively, generate synthetic data conforming to the schema to reach the 10k+ target for testing purposes.
    • Outcome: A verified earthquakes.json file containing at least 10,000 data points.

  2. Performance Baseline:

    • Action: Load the application with the large dataset without virtualization implemented.
    • Metrics: Measure and record:
      • Initial load time.
      • Map interaction latency (panning, zooming).
      • Animation smoothness (FPS during updates/simulations) using browser developer tools.
    • Outcome: Baseline performance metrics to compare against after optimization.

  3. Implement Data Virtualization Strategy:

    • Strategy Choice: Focus on rendering only the data points visible within the current map viewport. Use spatial indexing for efficient querying.
    • Actions:
      • Spatial Indexing: Integrate d3-quadtree (or a similar library/implementation) to index the earthquake data points by their geographic coordinates (latitude, longitude).
      • Viewport Calculation: On map pan/zoom events, determine the geographic bounding box of the visible map area based on the D3 projection and current transform.
      • Dynamic Data Querying: Modify the rendering logic: Instead of binding all 10k+ points, use the Quadtree to query only the points falling within the current viewport bounding box.
      • D3 Update Pattern: Update the D3 selection bound to the subset of visible points. Ensure the enter/update/exit pattern correctly adds points entering the viewport and removes points leaving it.
      • Filtering Integration: Ensure existing filters (magnitude, depth, region) are applied efficiently, potentially by filtering the data before querying the Quadtree or filtering the subset returned by the Quadtree.

  4. Performance Testing & Refinement:

    • Action: Load the application with the large dataset with virtualization implemented.
    • Metrics: Re-measure the same metrics as in Step 2 (load time, interaction latency, FPS).
    • Analysis: Compare the new metrics against the baseline. Identify any remaining bottlenecks (e.g., Quadtree query speed, D3 rendering updates).
    • Refinement: Optimize the virtualization implementation based on the analysis. This might involve tweaking the Quadtree usage or refining the D3 update logic.

  5. Consider Web Workers (If Necessary):

    • Trigger: If main thread performance (especially during interactions or filtering) is still unsatisfactory after Step 4.
    • Action: Refactor the spatial indexing query logic (and potentially initial data parsing/indexing) to run within a Web Worker.
    • Integration: Implement communication between the main thread (React/D3 components) and the Web Worker to pass viewport bounds and receive the subset of visible data points.
    • Testing: Re-run performance tests to confirm the improvement in UI responsiveness.

This plan focuses on viewport-based virtualization using spatial indexing as the primary optimization technique, aligning with common practices for large geographic datasets in D3.