#0052 RDF for PublicName Resolution

[david-maidsafe]

RDF for PublicName Resolution

ℹ️ Summary:

This RFC looks to enhance the domain name system by using a resource description framework.

• 📚 ReadMe (the RFC proposal)
• ✍️ Discussion - This issue!

[ustulation]

I (or maybe even we but less so) sounds a bit off being used in the RFC given there's no author(s) section. So either add author(s) like in these for e.g., or construct sentences without such prepositions.

[ustulation]

A few points for the demo here:

1. typo in schema within Resolvable and FilesMap - currently: joshuef.sschema ah the actual repo does say sschema in github so i guess that's fine then.
2. (This might be me understanding it wrong) - the file-content for FileItem index.html should be safe://somewhere.mypubname/index.html OR safe://mypubname (I'm not sure about the latter but I'm thinking the absence of tokens is first going to resolve to the default ResolvableItem thisxorurl#somewhere which is going to further resolve to the default FileItem index.html.

[ustulation]

type tag here should be 15000 (or 15001 according to the pictorial representation inline ?)

[Lindsey17]

Forum thread discussion