From b11576e7ec62ed45383ea030cea7d163d9a594a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kixelated Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 23:04:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Update forward-error-correction.mdx --- src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx b/src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx index 6f03a23..8d800dc 100644 --- a/src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx +++ b/src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ It's wasteful but it's simple and might be good enough for some hops. ## In Defense of FEC This is a hot topic and I am quite ignorant. -I don't to be too dismissive. +I don't want to be too dismissive. There are absolutely scenarios where FEC is the best solution. When you're sending data over a satellite link, you're dealing with a high RTT and burst loss. @@ -194,4 +194,4 @@ Just please, never show me a graph based on random packet loss again. Written by [@kixelated](https://github.com/kixelated). -![@kixelated](/blog/avatar.png) \ No newline at end of file +![@kixelated](/blog/avatar.png)