Why limit scope to just IETF-defined modules

[kwatsen]

Jonathan> Why does 7(A) limit the scope to IETF-defined modules of others are now defining YANG modules?

Benoit> Good point. We need to provide guidance for the other SDOs.

[bclaise]

This issue will be taken care of in the Guidelines document RFC6087bis, for both the IETF and the other SDOs, once we agree on the solution.
It is covered by both:
netmod-wg/rfc6087bis#18
netmod-wg/rfc6087bis#22

I would change the requirement text like this.
OLD:

  7.  Ability for distinct modules to leverage a common model-structure
       A.  Scope is limited to IETF-defined modules
       B.  Multiple domain-specific trees are okay
       C.  Multiple namespaces are okay

NEW:

  7.  Ability for distinct modules to leverage a common model-structure
       A.  Focus on the IETF-defined modules, and ideally provides guidance to other SDOs
       B.  Multiple domain-specific trees are okay
       C.  Multiple namespaces are okay

[kwatsen]

NEW:

   7.  Ability for distinct modules to leverage a common model-structure
        A.  Focus on the IETF-defined modules, and ideally provides guidance to other SDOs
        B.  Multiple domain-specific trees are okay
        C.  Model-structures may be defined in multiple modules with distinct namespaces.

If no one objects within 5 days, we will move forward with the NEW text listed above for requirement #7.

Thanks,
Kent

[kwatsen]

More than 5 days with no objections, moving to EDIT state.

[kwatsen]

7-C was accepted in -00 draft (moving to DONE)