Skip to content

Type strain record present in latest NCBI_16S build not visible on https://ya16sdb.labmed.uw.edu/ #54

@marykstewart

Description

@marykstewart

I'm coming at this from the perspective of this sv and a few other S. maltophilia-ish svs in the NGS16S case https://share.labmed.uw.edu/molmicro/markergene/23N0214_NGS16S/report/23R169-19/details-sv-0085:23R169-19.html#tab_plottab.

I was looking to see where the S. maltophilia type strains are, NCBI indicates there are many including NR_119220_1_1500, which is in the latest build.

grep "NR_119220.1" /molmicro/common/ncbi/16s/output/LATEST/dedup/1200bp/named/filtered/trusted/seq_info.csv
NR_119220_1_1500,NR_119220.1,NR_119220,NR_119220,"Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain LMG 958 16S ribosomal RNA, partial sequence",40324,12-Mar-2019,12-Jul-2019,1,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,RefSeq,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,1500,1,LMG 958,rRNA,,,1,1500,29,1514,,,,40324,40323,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,Stenotrophomonas,True,True,True,True,type,,,,,,,,,,,,cab8c8fe29c0259f18a178d94abf7230ead38212,JF343225_1_1237,0.000809,False,21.0,0.0034076332023561,-0.0002546308763511,True,0.0809,438.0

I only see one (DQ067559_1_1412) listed in https://ya16sdb.labmed.uw.edu/. Is there a row limit? The minimum dist_pct I see is 0.91, so I suspect that's the case but wanted to confirm.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions