Skip to content

Conversation

@benoitmaillard
Copy link
Contributor

@benoitmaillard benoitmaillard commented Nov 10, 2025

This PR addresses a missed optimization in PhaseIterGVN due to a missing notification to indirect users within PhaseIterGVN::add_users_of_use_to_worklist.

The affected optimization is the transformation of (x & mask) >> shift into (x >> shift) & (mask >> shift), where mask is a constant, for URShiftL and URShiftI nodes. This transformation is handled in URShiftLNode::Ideal and URShiftINode::Ideal. JDK-8361700 addressed the analog case for RShiftL and RShiftI, but lacked the notification for unsigned shifting.

This PR builds on top of JDK-8361700 and adds the following changes:

  • Fix the notification mechanism in add_users_of_use_to_worklist
  • Add the URShiftL in TestMaskAndRShiftReorder.java
  • Drive-by changes: simplify the RShiftL test case slightly, and add the missing analog case for RShiftI

I tried to reproduce the missing optimization for the URShiftI without success. There must be some subtle difference with the long case that causes the optimization to be triggered in this specific setup. I still added the case to the fix in add_users_of_use_to_worklist, as there are likely cases where the notification is missing (but I was just not able to find one).

Testing

Thank you for reviewing!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8371534: C2: Missed Ideal optimization opportunity with AndL and URShiftL (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28218/head:pull/28218
$ git checkout pull/28218

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28218
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28218/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28218

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28218

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28218.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back bmaillard! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

@benoitmaillard This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371534: C2: Missed Ideal optimization opportunity with AndL and URShiftL

Reviewed-by: thartmann, mhaessig

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8371534 8371534: C2: Missed Ideal optimization opportunity with AndL and URShiftL Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

@benoitmaillard The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@benoitmaillard benoitmaillard marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 15:28
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks good to me. Thanks for quickly jumping on this!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing this, @benoitmaillard! This looks good to me.

@benoitmaillard
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews @TobiHartmann @mhaessig!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Going to push as commit f5eacbe.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

@benoitmaillard Pushed as commit f5eacbe.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants