Skip to content

Detect common transcript errors #7

@waldoj

Description

@waldoj

I'm seeing Whisper do goofy, incorrect stuff sometimes.

One is the insertion of earlier phrases later on in transcripts, sprinkled through the transcript.

Another is repeating a phrase dozens of times:

[00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:08.000]   >> A question whether that is necessary for an objection
[00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:11.000]   to the question.
[00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:14.000]   >> I think that's a good question. I think that's a good
[00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:17.000]   question. I think that's a good question.
[00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:20.000]   >> I think that's a good question. I think that's a good
[00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:23.000]   question. I think that's a good question. I think that's a
[00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.000]   good question. I think that's a good question. I think that's
[00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:29.000]   a good question. I think that's a good question. I think that's
[00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:32.000]   a good question.
[00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:35.000]   >> I think that's a good question. I think that's a good
[00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:38.000]   question. I think that's a good question.

Identify a lightweight way to identify these artifacts in transcripts and flag them for review or re-processing.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions