Update OpenSSL dependency #178
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updated OpenSSL dependency in AppReceiptVerificator to support dynamic frameworks in Swift. Based on the issue here: robotmedia#170 (comment)
Author
|
Updated with fixes suggested above |
|
Any reason this is not merged? This fixes the issue |
|
+1 merge please |
|
Any new? |
|
This is good stuff! Although in my fork, I had to remove the line |
|
+1 merge please |
|
Please @hpique, we need this merge |
everappz
added a commit
to everappz/RMStore
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
Updated OpenSSL dependency in AppReceiptVerificator to support dynamic frameworks in Swift. Based on the issue here: robotmedia#170 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated OpenSSL dependency in AppReceiptVerificator to support dynamic frameworks in Swift. Based on the issue here: #170 (comment)