License?

[postmodern]

I just noticed that we do not explicitly state what license the repository and it's content is under. I suppose we would want to use Creative Commons?

[brettchalupa]

There should probably be two licenses - one for the content (something like Creative Commons would be one) and then one for the actual code in the repository.

[stomar]

The Ruby license (for code) is linked to on the downloads page (though only the latest version which might not apply to older branches).

[JuanitoFatas]

Add a CC BY-SA 4.0 license?

[hoeni]

+1 It would be great to have an official licence for the content to allow easy reuse.