Skip to content

ACP: impl TryFrom<{OsString, &OsStr}> for String #732

@Kixunil

Description

@Kixunil

Proposal

Problem statement

When writing a function which is supposed to check the contents of a string and then conditionally store String and where it is expected that the string might have come from OS, the best type for the argument is impl AsRef<OsStr> + TryInto<String> because:

  • &str and String don't support OS strings
  • &OsStr can't take advantage of the existing allocation if the caller happens to have OsString and doesn't need it anymore
  • OsString forces a caller which only has &OsStr to allocate even when the callee wouldn't need the owned string

Motivating examples or use cases

I'm writing a crate that has a type supposed to store either a systemd socket name or Unix socket address:

enum SocketAddr {
    Path(std::os::unix::net::SocketAddr),
    Systemd(SocketName /* just wrapped String */),
}

The format is defined to start with systemd:// for systemd sockets, so I need to first check which kind it is first and then attempt to parse that kind. unix::net::SocketAddr doesn't need an allocated string but SocketName does.

Solution sketch

Just write the obvious impl that checks the string first and converts if it is UTF-8.

Alternatives

Force everyone to newtype the type or write their own traits. I think this is way too annoying for something that looks like it should've been implemented a long time ago.

Links and related work

Notably, there already are similar conversions for other types.

What happens now?

This issue contains an API change proposal (or ACP) and is part of the libs-api team feature lifecycle. Once this issue is filed, the libs-api team will review open proposals as capability becomes available. Current response times do not have a clear estimate, but may be up to several months.

Possible responses

The libs team may respond in various different ways. First, the team will consider the problem (this doesn't require any concrete solution or alternatives to have been proposed):

  • We think this problem seems worth solving, and the standard library might be the right place to solve it.
  • We think that this probably doesn't belong in the standard library.

Second, if there's a concrete solution:

  • We think this specific solution looks roughly right, approved, you or someone else should implement this. (Further review will still happen on the subsequent implementation PR.)
  • We're not sure this is the right solution, and the alternatives or other materials don't give us enough information to be sure about that. Here are some questions we have that aren't answered, or rough ideas about alternatives we'd want to see discussed.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    T-libs-apiapi-change-proposalA proposal to add or alter unstable APIs in the standard libraries

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions