-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Description
Proposal
Problem statement
When writing a function which is supposed to check the contents of a string and then conditionally store String and where it is expected that the string might have come from OS, the best type for the argument is impl AsRef<OsStr> + TryInto<String> because:
&strandStringdon't support OS strings&OsStrcan't take advantage of the existing allocation if the caller happens to haveOsStringand doesn't need it anymoreOsStringforces a caller which only has&OsStrto allocate even when the callee wouldn't need the owned string
Motivating examples or use cases
I'm writing a crate that has a type supposed to store either a systemd socket name or Unix socket address:
enum SocketAddr {
Path(std::os::unix::net::SocketAddr),
Systemd(SocketName /* just wrapped String */),
}The format is defined to start with systemd:// for systemd sockets, so I need to first check which kind it is first and then attempt to parse that kind. unix::net::SocketAddr doesn't need an allocated string but SocketName does.
Solution sketch
Just write the obvious impl that checks the string first and converts if it is UTF-8.
Alternatives
Force everyone to newtype the type or write their own traits. I think this is way too annoying for something that looks like it should've been implemented a long time ago.
Links and related work
Notably, there already are similar conversions for other types.
What happens now?
This issue contains an API change proposal (or ACP) and is part of the libs-api team feature lifecycle. Once this issue is filed, the libs-api team will review open proposals as capability becomes available. Current response times do not have a clear estimate, but may be up to several months.
Possible responses
The libs team may respond in various different ways. First, the team will consider the problem (this doesn't require any concrete solution or alternatives to have been proposed):
- We think this problem seems worth solving, and the standard library might be the right place to solve it.
- We think that this probably doesn't belong in the standard library.
Second, if there's a concrete solution:
- We think this specific solution looks roughly right, approved, you or someone else should implement this. (Further review will still happen on the subsequent implementation PR.)
- We're not sure this is the right solution, and the alternatives or other materials don't give us enough information to be sure about that. Here are some questions we have that aren't answered, or rough ideas about alternatives we'd want to see discussed.