Commit 9ee9c49
committed
introducing let-syntax
The let-syntax expander is different in that it doesn't apply
a mark to its token trees before expansion. This is used
for macro_rules, and it's because macro_rules is essentially
MTWT's let-syntax. You don't want to mark before expand sees
let-syntax, because there's no "after" syntax to mark again.
In some sense, the cleaner approach might be to introduce a new
AST node that macro_rules expands into; this would make it clearer
that the expansion of a macro is distinct from the addition of a
new macro binding.
This should work for now, though...1 parent 92c2ff6 commit 9ee9c49
File tree
3 files changed
+30
-3
lines changed- src
- librustc/plugin
- libsyntax/ext
3 files changed
+30
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
15 | 15 | | |
16 | | - | |
| 16 | + | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | 19 | | |
| |||
57 | 57 | | |
58 | 58 | | |
59 | 59 | | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
60 | 62 | | |
61 | 63 | | |
62 | 64 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
264 | 264 | | |
265 | 265 | | |
266 | 266 | | |
267 | | - | |
268 | 267 | | |
| 268 | + | |
| 269 | + | |
| 270 | + | |
| 271 | + | |
| 272 | + | |
| 273 | + | |
| 274 | + | |
| 275 | + | |
269 | 276 | | |
270 | 277 | | |
271 | 278 | | |
| |||
300 | 307 | | |
301 | 308 | | |
302 | 309 | | |
303 | | - | |
| 310 | + | |
304 | 311 | | |
305 | 312 | | |
306 | 313 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
484 | 484 | | |
485 | 485 | | |
486 | 486 | | |
| 487 | + | |
| 488 | + | |
| 489 | + | |
| 490 | + | |
| 491 | + | |
| 492 | + | |
| 493 | + | |
| 494 | + | |
| 495 | + | |
| 496 | + | |
| 497 | + | |
| 498 | + | |
| 499 | + | |
| 500 | + | |
| 501 | + | |
| 502 | + | |
| 503 | + | |
| 504 | + | |
487 | 505 | | |
488 | 506 | | |
489 | 507 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments