@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
184184use rustc_data_structures:: sync:: { par_iter, MTLock , MTRef , ParallelIterator } ;
185185use rustc_errors:: { ErrorReported , FatalError } ;
186186use rustc_hir as hir;
187- use rustc_hir:: def_id:: { DefId , DefIdMap , LocalDefId } ;
187+ use rustc_hir:: def_id:: { DefId , DefIdMap , LocalDefId , LOCAL_CRATE } ;
188188use rustc_hir:: itemlikevisit:: ItemLikeVisitor ;
189189use rustc_hir:: lang_items:: LangItem ;
190190use rustc_index:: bit_set:: GrowableBitSet ;
@@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ fn collect_roots(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, mode: MonoItemCollectionMode) -> Vec<MonoItem<
342342 . collect ( )
343343}
344344
345- // Collect all monomorphized items reachable from `starting_point`
345+ /// Collect all monomorphized items reachable from `starting_point`, and emit a note diagnostic if a
346+ /// post-monorphization error is encountered during a collection step.
346347fn collect_items_rec < ' tcx > (
347348 tcx : TyCtxt < ' tcx > ,
348349 starting_point : Spanned < MonoItem < ' tcx > > ,
@@ -359,6 +360,31 @@ fn collect_items_rec<'tcx>(
359360 let mut neighbors = Vec :: new ( ) ;
360361 let recursion_depth_reset;
361362
363+ //
364+ // Post-monomorphization errors MVP
365+ //
366+ // We can encounter errors while monomorphizing an item, but we don't have a good way of
367+ // showing a complete stack of spans ultimately leading to collecting the erroneous one yet.
368+ // (It's also currently unclear exactly which diagnostics and information would be interesting
369+ // to report in such cases)
370+ //
371+ // This leads to suboptimal error reporting: a post-monomorphization error (PME) will be
372+ // shown with just a spanned piece of code causing the error, without information on where
373+ // it was called from. This is especially obscure if the erroneous mono item is in a
374+ // dependency. See for example issue #85155, where, before minimization, a PME happened two
375+ // crates downstream from libcore's stdarch, without a way to know which dependency was the
376+ // cause.
377+ //
378+ // If such an error occurs in the current crate, its span will be enough to locate the
379+ // source. If the cause is in another crate, the goal here is to quickly locate which mono
380+ // item in the current crate is ultimately responsible for causing the error.
381+ //
382+ // To give at least _some_ context to the user: while collecting mono items, we check the
383+ // error count. If it has changed, a PME occurred, and we trigger some diagnostics about the
384+ // current step of mono items collection.
385+ //
386+ let error_count = tcx. sess . diagnostic ( ) . err_count ( ) ;
387+
362388 match starting_point. node {
363389 MonoItem :: Static ( def_id) => {
364390 let instance = Instance :: mono ( tcx, def_id) ;
@@ -411,6 +437,22 @@ fn collect_items_rec<'tcx>(
411437 }
412438 }
413439
440+ // Check for PMEs and emit a diagnostic if one happened. To try to show relevant edges of the
441+ // mono item graph where the PME diagnostics are currently the most problematic (e.g. ones
442+ // involving a dependency, and the lack of context is confusing) in this MVP, we focus on
443+ // diagnostics on edges crossing a crate boundary: the collected mono items which are not
444+ // defined in the local crate.
445+ if tcx. sess . diagnostic ( ) . err_count ( ) > error_count && starting_point. node . krate ( ) != LOCAL_CRATE
446+ {
447+ tcx. sess . span_note_without_error (
448+ starting_point. span ,
449+ & format ! (
450+ "the above error was encountered while instantiating `{}`" ,
451+ starting_point. node
452+ ) ,
453+ ) ;
454+ }
455+
414456 record_accesses ( tcx, starting_point. node , neighbors. iter ( ) . map ( |i| & i. node ) , inlining_map) ;
415457
416458 for neighbour in neighbors {
0 commit comments