Skip to content

Can plan executions take &self instead of &mut self? #115

@dodomorandi

Description

@dodomorandi

I am asking this, because I am having a hard time trying to check whether this is possible or not. According to this documentation, execution of plans should take a const pointer to the plan (which AFAIK is nearly meaningless in the C world, because you are totally safe (ahem) to change nested values...).

Maybe it could be possible, but I am completely unable to hack through the code of FFTW3 to find the answer by myself. I could not find a similar question, therefore, even if c2c/r2c/c2r really need to use &mut self, at least there is an issue explicitly discussing this.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions