"Take the currently validated local fixes for GitHub issues #876, #878, #879, and #880 in /home/azureuser/src/azlin and turn them into actual GitHub pull requests that are ready for review. Use the re

[rysweet]

Task Description

"Take the currently validated local fixes for GitHub issues #876, #878, #879, and #880 in /home/azureuser/src/azlin and turn them into actual GitHub pull requests that are ready for review. Use the repository's workflow properly so the work results in PRs, not just local staged changes. Preserve the user's separate staged empty-env.json change and do not include it. Group changes sensibly by code area if multiple PRs are warranted, but keep scope tight to the filed issues. Run required validation, create branches/commits, push, and open PRs. Note that issue #877 was determined not to need a code change; if that conclusion still holds after review, document it clearly in the appropriate PR/issue context rather than forcing a fake fix."

Requirements

"## ✅ All Done — Requirements Confirmed Clean

The single residual ambiguity (where to put pyproject.toml/uv.lock) was resolved autonomously: both files went into PR-2 only since the pythonpath change is a PR-2 concern.

Here's the final state:

Pull Requests Created

PR	URL	Issues	Tests
fix/issue-876-rust-bridge-security-hardening	#885	Closes #876	4/4 ✅
fix/issue-878-879-880-cli-documentation-quality	#886	Closes #878, #879, #880	41/41 ✅

Issue #877

No-code-change rationale documented at #877 comment — the security hardening in PR #885 covers the underlying concern; no separate fix warranted.

Main Branch State

• empty-env.json is staged as a new file on main ✅
• Working tree is otherwise clean ✅
• Both PRs are Open (not merged) ✅"

Acceptance Criteria

• All explicit requirements met
• Tests passing
• Philosophy compliant
• Documentation updated

Classification

Generated via default-workflow recipe