Skip to content

Do we want to support non-dict backends? #220

@fwkoch

Description

@fwkoch

This was a thought very early in the life of properties, but nothing has come of it. The idea is that properties may become an interface for a database, where underlying property values are stored somewhere a bit more robust than just a dictionary.

In practice, though, properties has worked well as a user interface separated from the database by serialize/deserialize. The close connection of _backend to a database has not been necessary.

Is there any merit to the idea of "swappable backends"? My current thinking is "no" but maybe there is.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions