Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 1, 2025. It is now read-only.

dynamic JavaScript analysis / hepl 👍 #2435

Open
listmen001 opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

dynamic JavaScript analysis / hepl 👍 #2435

listmen001 opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@listmen001
Copy link

Hello, creator of the hamster code!

I am very glad that I found your code a couple of weeks ago.
I studied it all.
I found a lot of interesting solutions.
The project is very huge and solves all the hamster tasks that are available in the tg-app.
Some of the solutions you received did not work out on your own, but you did it :)

I don't like everything about the design of the code, but that's not the main thing, the main thing is that the code works and it performs the main task.
From your code, I took some parts for myself, namely the mini-games "puzzle game" and "hexa puzzle".

A very interesting solution for these games.
I see that you can use dynamic JavaScript analysis and this is a very powerful knowledge!
I'm thrilled!
I have tried many times to work independently in dynamic analysis of JS and the result, most often, is zero.
It turns out to find constants, sometimes something more, but most often, the necessary strings, which are formed depending on changing parameters, cannot be studied and understood how this happens.
That is, what is basic in dynamic analysis cannot be solved.
But you really need and want to be able to.
Please, creator, tell me the resources, knowledge, where and how to study the dynamic analysis of JS?
I will be very grateful!

@Slamifoe21
Copy link

Go to #2272

@mirage2812
Copy link

согласен, код отличный образец для других ботов - как надо делать!

@listmen001
Copy link
Author

Go to #2272

е ба ну тьс я)
точно еще развлечений на пару лет вперед наберу себе)
спасибо.

Вообще ничего не понятно пока что.
Это так весело!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants