Skip to content

Grammar: more strict WFF with parentheses #4

@shevron

Description

@shevron

Currently the parser is a bit loose when it comes to the use of parentheses, for example this is a valid WFF as far as the grammar is concerned:

((p) ≡ (q))

But based on IEP article, the extra parentheses are invalid. It should be easy to make the grammar slightly more strict regarding such cases.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions