filtered-search: validation function

[spike-rabbit]

Prerequisites

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines.
• I have not leaked any internal/restricted information like screenshots, videos, code snippets, links etc.

Feature request

We need a more flexible approach for validation in the filtered-search. It must possible for apps to validate what ever they need.

Use case

Complex validation logic where apps rely on a specific order or other things we don't know about.

[coderabbitai]

📝 CodeRabbit Plan Mode

Generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding agent.

• Create Plan

Examples

• Example 1
• Example 2

---

🔗 Similar Issues

Related Issues

• Test #674
• typeahead: extract search algorithm in seperate module #803
• Improve si-select customization #1098
• accounting / large number input #813
• filtered-search: trim white space #1228

👤 Suggested Assignees

• spike-rabbit
• panch1739
• spliffone

---

🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.

You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.

To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your .coderabbit.yaml:

issue_enrichment:
  auto_enrich:
    enabled: false

💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord or schedule a call!