-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
feat: add resources and meta to mcp manifests #674
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 04d1443 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
| }>; | ||
| resources?: Array<{ | ||
| name: string; | ||
| description?: string | undefined; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think something we need to figure out. Although descriptions seemingly are optional at the MCP SDK level for tools and resources our Gram Functions system requires them. Not totally sure what to do about this
f24d66f to
225afc6
Compare
225afc6 to
9025ed9
Compare
Add resources to functions manifest for any resources that are defined on the mcp sdk.
Additionally, add handleResources export to the mcp server template, so calls will be proxied for functions defined in the SDK