Skip to content

Should we provide a prefixed version of context? #6

@stain

Description

@stain

An alternative context is available at https://w3id.org/ore/context-ore, which defines ORE terms with the ore: prefix. This context MAY be used instead, for instance to avoid naming conflicts when including the ORE context in another JSON-LD context.

Should this be included? The reason I made it was thinking of the case of other people importing the ORE context within an application-specific context. We might not want to hijack non-prefixed names like "describes".

If it is to be included, does the text need more explanation on to when it should and should not be used?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions