Standardized licensing vocabulary

[M3nin0]

Should we use a standardized licensing vocabulary ?

[M3nin0]

Currently the JSONSChema definition for licenses has the following structure.

        "rights": {
          "description": "Any license or copyright information for this resource.",
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "additionalProperties": false,
            "properties": {
              "title": {
                "description": "The license name or license itself. Free text.",
                "type": "object"
              },
              "description": {
                "description": "The license description Free text.",
                "type": "object"
              },
              "link": {
                "type": "string",
                "format": "uri"
              }
            }
          }
        }

In this definition, the fields title and description have no restrictions. The user can add any value. With a default dictionary, as shown in the document below, the license gets an ID. This brings up the need to define an interface that makes these licenses available. The use of invenio-vocabularies can be considered in this case.

        "rights": {
          "description": "Any license or copyright information for this resource.",
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "additionalProperties": false,
            "properties": {
              "id": {
                "$ref": "local://records/definitions-v1.0.0.json#/identifier"
              },
              "title": {
                "description": "The license name or license itself. Free text.",
                "type": "object"
              },
              "description": {
                "description": "The license description Free text.",
                "type": "object"
              },
              "link": {
                "type": "string",
                "format": "uri"
              }
            }
          }
        }