diff --git a/content/enterprise-identity-management/index.md b/content/enterprise-identity-management/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..14cf723a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/enterprise-identity-management/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,926 @@
+---
+title: Enterprise Identity Management What You Need to Know in 2025
+description: "Explore how enterprise identity management works, the challenges it solves, and what features modern orgs need for secure, scalable access control."
+date: "10/27/2025"
+cover: "EIM.png"
+category: "authentication, compliance, enterprise"
+author: "Maurice Saldivar"
+---
+## Table Of Contents
+
+- [Enterprise Identity Management: What You Need to Know in 2025](#enterprise-identity-management-what-you-need-to-know-in-2025)
+- [The Scale Challenge](#the-scale-challenge)
+- [What Is Enterprise Identity Management?](#what-is-enterprise-identity-management)
+  - [Why Enterprise Identity Management Exists](#why-enterprise-identity-management-exists)
+  - [IAM vs Enterprise IAM](#iam-vs-enterprise-iam)
+- [Core Components of a Modern Enterprise IAM System](#core-components-of-a-modern-enterprise-iam-system)
+  - [Authentication and MFA](#authentication-and-mfa)
+  - [Access Control](#access-control)
+  - [Identity Federation](#identity-federation)
+  - [User Lifecycle Management](#user-lifecycle-management)
+  - [Audit and Compliance](#audit-and-compliance)
+- [Common Challenges in Enterprise Identity Management](#common-challenges-in-enterprise-identity-management)
+  - [Tool Sprawl and Identity Silos](#tool-sprawl-and-identity-silos)
+  - [Manual Onboarding and Offboarding](#manual-onboarding-and-offboarding)
+  - [Shadow IT and Unmanaged Access](#shadow-it-and-unmanaged-access)
+  - [Complex Compliance Requirements](#complex-compliance-requirements)
+- [SuperTokens for Enterprise Identity Management](#supertokens-for-enterprise-identity-management)
+  - [Full Control Through Self-Hosting](#full-control-through-self-hosting)
+  - [Enterprise Features Built for Scale](#enterprise-features-built-for-scale)
+  - [Developer-First Architecture](#developer-first-architecture)
+  - [Deployment Flexibility](#deployment-flexibility)
+- [How to Evaluate an Enterprise IAM Solution](#how-to-evaluate-an-enterprise-iam-solution)
+  - [Security and Compliance Fit](#security-and-compliance-fit)
+  - [Customizability](#customizability)
+  - [Integration Surface](#integration-surface)
+  - [Scalability](#scalability)
+  - [Operational Overhead](#operational-overhead)
+- [Best Practices for Enterprise Identity Management](#best-practices-for-enterprise-identity-management)
+  - [Centralize Identity](#centralize-identity)
+  - [Automate User Lifecycle](#automate-user-lifecycle)
+  - [Implement Strong Authentication by Default](#implement-strong-authentication-by-default)
+  - [Audit Everything](#audit-everything)
+  - [Review Roles Regularly](#review-roles-regularly)
+- [Conclusion](#conclusion)
+
+
+## Enterprise Identity Management: What You Need to Know in 2025
+
+Managing identities at enterprise scale involves coordinating access for thousands of employees across hundreds of applications while maintaining security and compliance. Unlike smaller organizations that can manage authentication through simple user databases, enterprises face unique challenges that require specialized identity infrastructure.
+
+## The Scale Challenge
+
+Enterprise identity management differs fundamentally from standard authentication systems. A startup might handle 50 users accessing 10 applications. An enterprise can manage 10,000 employees, 5,000 contractors, and 50,000 customer accounts across 500 internal applications, cloud services, and legacy systems.
+
+This scale creates cascading complexity. When an employee changes departments, their access permissions must update across dozens of systems instantly. When someone leaves the company, every access point needs immediate revocation. Manual processes that work for small teams create security vulnerabilities and operational bottlenecks at enterprise scale.
+
+Consider a typical enterprise onboarding: A new engineer needs access to GitHub, AWS, Jira, Slack, the VPN, internal wikis, monitoring dashboards, and deployment tools. Each system has different permission models, authentication methods, and audit requirements. Without centralized identity management, IT teams spend days configuring access and months tracking down orphaned accounts.
+
+Modern enterprises also manage identities beyond employees. Partners need limited access to collaboration tools. Customers require secure portals for their data. IoT devices and service accounts need programmatic access to APIs. Each identity type demands different security policies, lifecycle management, and compliance tracking.
+
+The regulatory environment adds another layer. GDPR requires knowing exactly what data each user can access. SOC2 demands documented access controls and regular reviews. SOX requires separation of duties with detailed audit trails. Industry-specific regulations like HIPAA or PCI-DSS impose strict access controls with severe penalties for violations.
+
+This is where enterprise identity management platforms become essential. They provide the centralized control, automation, and visibility that manual processes can't deliver at scale. The right system transforms identity management from a security risk into a competitive advantage through improved efficiency, stronger security, and better user experiences.
+
+## What Is Enterprise Identity Management?
+
+Enterprise Identity Management is the framework for controlling digital identities and their access to resources across an organization's entire technology ecosystem. It encompasses the processes, policies, and technologies that verify who users are, what they can access, and how their permissions change throughout their lifecycle with the organization.
+
+At its core, enterprise identity management answers three questions for every access request: Who are you? What are you allowed to do? Can you prove you should be doing this right now? These questions apply whether the requester is an employee accessing email, a service account calling an API, or a partner downloading shared documents.
+
+### Why Enterprise Identity Management Exists
+
+Organizations didn't always need dedicated identity management systems. Twenty years ago, most companies ran a handful of on-premise applications with basic username/password authentication. IT could manually create accounts and track access in spreadsheets.
+
+That model broke as businesses transformed digitally. Cloud adoption meant corporate data lived outside the firewall. Remote work eliminated the network perimeter as a security boundary. The average enterprise now uses 100+ SaaS applications, each potentially storing sensitive data.
+
+Security breaches shifted the landscape further. The 2023 Okta breach affected hundreds of companies because attackers compromised support system access. The [SolarWinds hack](https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/SolarWinds-hack-explained-Everything-you-need-to-know) showed how compromised service accounts could provide backdoor access to thousands of organizations. These incidents proved that identity had become the new security perimeter.
+
+Compliance requirements formalized what security teams already knew. Regulations now require organizations to prove who accessed what data, when, and why. A GDPR audit asks for every system a specific user could access and what personal data they could view. SOC2 compliance requires documented processes for granting, reviewing, and revoking access. SOX demands evidence that financial system access follows separation of duties. Manual tracking can't provide these answers at enterprise scale.
+
+The cost of getting identity wrong extends beyond breaches and fines. Poor identity management creates friction that impacts productivity. Knowledge workers waste [11 hours yearly](https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/up-to-11-hours-spent-every-year-resetting-passwords-1.819620) managing passwords and waiting for access approvals. New employees often wait days for system access, delaying productivity.
+
+### IAM vs Enterprise IAM
+
+Standard Identity and Access Management (IAM) handles basic authentication and authorization. It works well for single applications or small organizations with straightforward needs. Enterprise IAM operates at a fundamentally different scale and complexity level.
+
+**Scale Differences**
+
+Standard IAM might manage hundreds of users across a few applications. Enterprise IAM handles hundreds of thousands of identities across thousands of systems. This includes employees, contractors, partners, customers, service accounts, and IoT devices.
+
+A small company's IAM can rely on manual processes for edge cases. When a user needs special permissions, an admin handles it personally. At enterprise scale, edge cases happen thousands of times daily. Manual intervention becomes impossible.
+
+**Integration Requirements**
+
+Standard IAM typically integrates with modern applications using current protocols like SAML or OAuth. Enterprise environments include decades of technology layers. That critical manufacturing system might only support LDAP. The mainframe handling transactions uses RACF. The newly acquired subsidiary runs everything through Active Directory.
+
+Enterprise IAM must bridge these technology generations while maintaining consistent security policies. It needs to translate between protocols, synchronize identities across systems, and enforce policies regardless of the underlying technology.
+
+**Governance and Compliance**
+
+Small organizations can demonstrate compliance through documentation and spot checks. Enterprises face continuous audits across multiple regulatory frameworks. Enterprise IAM must provide real-time visibility into access rights, automated compliance reporting, and forensic capabilities for incident investigation.
+
+Access certification illustrates the difference. A startup might review permissions quarterly in a spreadsheet. An enterprise must certify that 10,000 managers have reviewed and approved access for 50,000 employees across 500 applications, with full audit trails and automatic revocation for non-responses.
+
+**Operational Complexity**
+
+Standard IAM handles straightforward scenarios: create user, assign role, grant access. Enterprise IAM manages complex workflows like:
+
+
+* Dynamic permissions that change based on location, time, or risk scores  
+* Segregation of duties that prevents toxic permission combinations
+* Account lifecycle management that handles transfers, leave of absence, and rehires
+* Privileged access management with just-in-time elevation and session recording
+
+The enterprise identity management platform becomes critical infrastructure, as essential as the network itself. When identity systems fail, business stops. This operational criticality drives requirements for high availability, disaster recovery, and zero-downtime deployments that standard IAM solutions rarely address.
+
+## Core Components of a Modern Enterprise IAM System
+
+Enterprise IAM platforms combine multiple technologies into an integrated system. Each component addresses specific identity challenges while working together to provide comprehensive identity management.
+
+### Authentication and MFA
+
+Authentication verifies user identity before granting system access. Modern enterprise authentication goes beyond passwords to address their inherent weaknesses: users create predictable passwords, reuse them across systems, and fall for phishing attacks.
+
+**Passwordless Authentication**
+
+Enterprises increasingly adopt passwordless methods to eliminate password-related vulnerabilities. WebAuthn enables authentication through biometrics or hardware security keys. When a user authenticates, their device creates a cryptographic signature that proves their identity without transmitting secrets that attackers could intercept.
+
+Microsoft reported that 99.9% of compromised accounts didn't use MFA. This statistic drives enterprises toward mandatory multi-factor authentication. But traditional MFA methods like SMS codes remain vulnerable. The MGM Resorts breach succeeded despite MFA because attackers convinced help desk staff to reset authentication settings.
+
+**Adaptive MFA**
+
+Adaptive authentication adjusts security requirements based on risk signals. A user logging in from their regular office computer might authenticate with just biometrics. The same user accessing sensitive data from a new location triggers additional verification steps.
+
+Risk scoring considers multiple factors:
+* Device trust status and compliance
+* Network location and reputation  
+* Time of access and usual patterns
+* Resource sensitivity
+* Recent security events
+
+This approach balances security with usability. Users experience friction only when genuine risk exists, reducing MFA fatigue that leads to workarounds.
+
+### Access Control
+
+Access control determines what authenticated users can do. Enterprises must balance enabling productivity with preventing unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
+
+**Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)**
+
+RBAC assigns permissions through roles rather than individual user assignments. A "Senior Accountant" role includes access to financial systems, reporting tools, and specific shared drives. When someone joins the accounting team, they receive this role and automatically gain appropriate access.
+
+RBAC simplifies administration at scale. Instead of managing millions of individual permission assignments, administrators maintain hundreds of well-defined roles. Changes to role definitions automatically propagate to all assigned users.
+
+However, RBAC alone creates challenges in dynamic environments. Roles proliferate as organizations try to handle edge cases, leading to "role explosion" where thousands of slightly different roles become unmanageable.
+
+**Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)**
+
+ABAC makes access decisions using attributes of users, resources, and environment. Instead of static roles, policies evaluate conditions dynamically:
+
+```
+IF user.department = "Finance" 
+AND user.clearance_level >= "Confidential"
+AND resource.classification = "Financial Data"
+AND time.is_business_hours = true
+THEN allow_access
+```
+
+This flexibility handles complex scenarios without creating specialized roles. Temporary contractors from specific vendors can access certain systems during project timelines. Employees can view sensitive data from office locations but not from public networks.
+
+**Least Privilege Enforcement**
+
+Least privilege ensures users have minimum necessary access for their job functions. This principle limits breach impact since compromised accounts can't access unrelated systems.
+
+Implementation requires continuous analysis of actual versus assigned permissions. Modern platforms use machine learning to identify unused privileges and recommend removal. They also enable just-in-time (JIT) access where elevated permissions are granted temporarily for specific tasks.
+
+### Identity Federation
+
+Federation enables users to access multiple systems with a single identity. Instead of maintaining separate accounts everywhere, users authenticate once and access all connected applications.
+
+**Single Sign-On (SSO)**
+
+SSO eliminates password proliferation by centralizing authentication. Users sign into the identity provider once, then access all integrated applications without re-authenticating. This improves security by reducing password exposure and enabling centralized policy enforcement.
+
+Enterprise SSO must support diverse protocols:
+* SAML 2.0 for enterprise applications
+* OAuth 2.0/OIDC for modern cloud services  
+* Kerberos for Windows environments
+* LDAP for legacy systems
+
+The identity provider becomes a critical control point. It enforces authentication policies, manages sessions, and provides the authoritative identity source for all connected systems.
+
+**Multi-Provider Federation**
+
+Large enterprises often federate with external identity providers. Employees might authenticate through Active Directory, while partners use their company's identity provider. Customers might sign in through social providers or consumer identity platforms.
+
+This requires identity routing that directs users to appropriate providers based on email domains or other identifiers. The enterprise IAM system must normalize identities from different sources while maintaining security boundaries between user populations.
+
+### User Lifecycle Management
+
+Identity lifecycle management automates account administration from hiring through termination. Manual processes can't keep pace with enterprise scale and introduce dangerous delays in access changes.
+
+**Automated Provisioning**
+
+When HR systems mark someone as hired, identity management platforms automatically:
+* Create accounts in core systems
+* Assign access based on job role and department
+* Configure email and collaboration tools
+* Request additional access requiring approval
+* Schedule training and compliance requirements
+
+This "birthright provisioning" ensures employees have necessary access on day one. Integration with HR systems maintains synchronization as roles change.
+
+**Deprovisioning and Access Reviews**
+
+Termination triggers immediate access revocation across all systems. But deprovisioning extends beyond simple account deletion. Systems must preserve audit trails, transfer ownership of resources, and archive data according to retention policies.
+
+Regular access reviews ensure permissions remain appropriate. Managers periodically certify their team's access rights. Automated campaigns track review completion and revoke access when managers don't respond. This continuous certification satisfies compliance requirements while preventing permission accumulation.
+
+**Just-In-Time Access**
+
+JIT access grants elevated permissions only when needed. Instead of permanent admin rights, engineers request access for specific tasks. After approval, they receive temporary elevation that automatically expires.
+
+This reduces the attack surface by minimizing standing privileges. It also creates clear audit trails linking privileged actions to approved requests.
+
+### Audit and Compliance
+
+Enterprise IAM platforms must provide comprehensive visibility into identity and access activities. This supports security monitoring, incident investigation, and compliance reporting.
+
+**Centralized Logging**
+
+Every authentication attempt, permission change, and access event generates detailed logs. These feed into SIEM platforms for security monitoring and threat detection. Anomaly detection identifies suspicious patterns like impossible travel or unusual access patterns.
+
+Log retention must balance compliance requirements with storage costs. Financial services might retain authentication logs for seven years. Healthcare organizations need detailed access logs for HIPAA compliance. The IAM platform must support flexible retention policies and efficient storage.
+
+**Compliance Reporting**
+
+Automated reporting demonstrates compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies. Common reports include:
+* User access reviews showing certification completion
+* Privileged account usage and justification
+* Segregation of duties violations
+* Orphaned accounts lacking valid owners
+* Cross-system access rights for specific users
+
+These reports must be generated on-demand for audits and scheduled for regular review. Integration with GRC platforms enables continuous compliance monitoring rather than point-in-time assessments.
+
+The IAM platform must also support forensic investigation. When incidents occur, security teams need to quickly determine what an account accessed, when access occurred, and whether it aligned with normal patterns. This requires detailed logs, efficient search capabilities, and clear visualization of access paths.
+
+## Common Challenges in Enterprise Identity Management
+
+Even with modern IAM platforms, enterprises face persistent identity management challenges. These problems compound as organizations grow through acquisition, adopt new technologies, and adapt to changing regulations.
+
+### Tool Sprawl and Identity Silos
+
+The average enterprise uses 100+ SaaS applications, but that number understates the real complexity. Development teams spin up AWS accounts for projects. Marketing trials new analytics platforms. Sales experiments with prospecting tools. Each application maintains its own user directory, creating identity silos across the organization.
+
+This fragmentation creates multiple problems. Users juggle dozens of passwords despite SSO initiatives because not every application supports federation. Some legacy systems only authenticate against Active Directory. That acquired company still runs its own identity infrastructure. The result is a patchwork of partially connected identity systems.
+
+Identity silos also fragment security policies. The main IAM platform might enforce MFA and session timeouts, but that departmental application using local authentication has neither. Attackers target these weak points, knowing that compromising one poorly secured application might provide lateral movement into more valuable systems.
+
+Data consistency becomes impossible when identities exist in multiple places. An employee's name changes in HR systems but not in the thirty applications where they have local accounts. Their old email address persists in some systems, creating confusion about which identity is authoritative. Access reviews become meaningless when reviewers can't see all the places users have access.
+
+The technical debt accumulates over years. That critical manufacturing system from 2003 can't integrate with modern IAM. The Excel spreadsheet tracking vendor access becomes the de facto system of record. Meanwhile, new applications keep arriving, each adding another identity silo to manage.
+
+### Manual Onboarding and Offboarding
+
+Despite automation capabilities, many enterprises still rely on manual processes for user lifecycle management. IT tickets request access, managers approve via email, and admins create accounts by hand. This worked when companies had dozens of applications. At enterprise scale, manual processes create serious risks.
+
+The numbers illustrate the problem. A 10,000-person company with 20% annual turnover handles 2,000 terminations yearly. Each termination requires disabling access across potentially 50+ systems. Miss one system and a terminated employee retains access. Multiply this by contractors, transfers, and role changes, and manual management becomes impossible.
+
+Timing creates the greatest risk. The average enterprise takes 3-7 days to fully deprovision terminated employees. During this window, disgruntled former employees could access sensitive data, delete critical resources, or steal intellectual property.
+
+Manual onboarding delays productivity. New employees wait days for access while tickets route through approval chains. A new developer might have laptop access but can't push code because GitHub provisioning is stuck in a queue. Sales representatives can't access CRM systems during their crucial first weeks. The productivity loss compounds across thousands of annual hires.
+
+Manual processes also lack consistency. One administrator might grant broad permissions to expedite access. Another might follow strict least-privilege principles. Over time, similar roles accumulate vastly different permission sets based on who processed their access requests.
+
+### Shadow IT and Unmanaged Access
+
+Shadow IT exists when business units adopt technology without IT involvement. A marketing team subscribes to a design platform using a corporate credit card. Engineers spin up personal AWS accounts for testing. Sales downloads a Chrome extension for email tracking. None of these appear in the official IT inventory.
+
+Cloud platforms amplify the problem. Developers can provision entire infrastructures in minutes using personal accounts. They share AWS access keys through Slack. They store database credentials in public GitHub repositories. By the time security teams discover these resources, sensitive data has already been exposed.
+
+Browser extensions pose particular risks. Users install password managers, productivity tools, and AI assistants that can access everything displayed in the browser. That ChatGPT extension might be sending confidential documents to OpenAI. The grammar checker could be harvesting email content. Without visibility into browser-based tools, enterprises can't assess or mitigate these risks.
+
+Service accounts multiply outside governance frameworks. Applications need programmatic access to other systems, so developers create service accounts with broad permissions. These accounts often have no owner, no expiration, and no oversight. They persist long after the applications they served were decommissioned, creating permanent backdoors into critical systems.
+
+The distributed nature of shadow IT makes it nearly impossible to secure through traditional means. You can't protect what you can't see. Identity management platforms must evolve to discover and govern these unmanaged identities before attackers exploit them.
+
+### Complex Compliance Requirements
+
+Regulatory compliance adds layers of complexity to identity management. Each framework has specific requirements that often conflict with operational needs or other regulations.
+
+**Industry-Specific Regulations**
+
+Healthcare organizations managing HIPAA compliance must track every access to patient records with detailed audit logs retained for six years. But HIPAA's minimum necessary standard conflicts with emergency access needs. Doctors need immediate access to save lives, but granting broad access violates compliance. The IAM system must balance these requirements through break-glass procedures and retroactive review processes.
+
+Financial services face overlapping requirements from SOX, PCI-DSS, and regional regulations. SOX demands separation of duties where no single person can complete a financial transaction alone. PCI-DSS requires quarterly access reviews for anyone touching payment card data. SOC2 certification requires documented access control policies, regular reviews, and incident response procedures. Regional laws like GDPR add data residency and privacy requirements. A single user might fall under multiple regulatory frameworks depending on their access patterns.
+
+**Global Privacy Regulations**
+
+GDPR transformed identity management by making personal data protection a board-level concern. Enterprises must track not just who can access personal data, but demonstrate the legal basis for that access. The right to be forgotten requires finding and removing personal data across all systems, including backup, and archive systems that might not integrate with central IAM.
+
+California's CPRA, Brazil's LGPD, and dozens of other privacy laws add their own requirements. Each has different definitions of personal information, consent requirements, and breach notification timelines. Multinational enterprises must implement identity controls that satisfy the strictest requirements across all jurisdictions.
+
+**Audit Complexity**
+
+Compliance audits no longer accept manual evidence collection. Auditors expect real-time reports showing current access rights, historical permission changes, and policy violations. They want to see not just who has access, but evidence that access is appropriate, reviewed regularly, and removed when no longer needed.
+
+The audit process itself creates challenges. Preparing for SOX compliance might require freezing access changes during audit periods. But business operations can't stop for compliance. The IAM platform must support audit modes that capture point-in-time configurations while allowing necessary changes to continue.
+
+Cross-regulation conflicts require careful orchestration. GDPR's data minimization principle suggests deleting data quickly. Legal hold requirements demand preserving data indefinitely. Industry regulations require retaining audit logs for years. The identity management system must implement retention policies that satisfy all applicable requirements while remaining manageable.
+
+These compliance challenges aren't just about avoiding fines. Data breaches involving non-compliance trigger lawsuits, reputation damage, and loss of customer trust.
+
+## SuperTokens for Enterprise Identity Management
+
+SuperTokens approaches enterprise identity differently than traditional IAM vendors. Instead of monolithic platforms with fixed features, it provides modular, open-source components that enterprises can configure, extend, and deploy according to their specific requirements.
+
+### Full Control Through Self-Hosting
+
+Enterprises in regulated industries can't send authentication data to third-party clouds. Financial services companies face data residency requirements. Healthcare organizations must maintain complete audit trails. Government agencies require air-gapped deployments. SuperTokens addresses these needs through true self-hosting capabilities.
+
+Self-hosting means running SuperTokens Core on your infrastructure, whether on-premise servers, private clouds, or within specific geographic regions. The authentication flow never leaves your network. User credentials, session data, and audit logs remain under your complete control. This isn't just running someone else's docker container; you have access to the source code and can modify it if needed.
+
+For enterprises with specific security requirements, this control extends to the cryptographic layer. You can configure algorithm choices, key rotation schedules, and token lifetimes. Need FIPS 140-2 compliant cryptography? Configure it. Require specific TLS cipher suites? Set them. Want to integrate with hardware security modules? The architecture supports it.
+
+The modular design means you only deploy what you need. If you don't use social login, that code doesn't exist in your deployment. This reduces attack surface and simplifies security audits. Auditors can review exactly what's running in production, not wade through features you'll never use.
+
+### Enterprise Features Built for Scale
+
+**Single Sign-On Integration**
+
+While SuperTokens doesn't provide native SAML support out of the box, it integrates with existing SSO infrastructure through flexible architecture. Enterprises typically run SuperTokens alongside their SAML identity provider, using it for modern applications while maintaining legacy SSO for older systems.
+
+```javascript
+import Session from "supertokens-node/recipe/session";
+
+async function onSAMLCallback(samlResponse) {
+    // Validate SAML assertion with existing provider
+    const userInfo = await validateSAMLAssertion(samlResponse);
+    
+    // Create SuperTokens session
+    const session = await Session.createNewSession(
+        req, res,
+        userInfo.userId,
+        {
+            department: userInfo.department,
+            roles: userInfo.roles
+        }
+    );
+}
+```
+
+This hybrid approach lets enterprises modernize authentication gradually. New applications use SuperTokens' JWT-based sessions. Legacy applications continue using SAML. Users experience seamless access across both worlds.
+
+**Multi-Tenancy at Scale**
+
+Multi-tenancy enables enterprises to isolate different user populations within a single deployment. Each subsidiary, department, or customer gets their own authentication realm with independent configurations.
+
+```python
+# Configure tenant-specific authentication
+from supertokens_python.recipe.multitenancy import create_or_update_tenant
+
+await create_or_update_tenant(
+    tenant_id="finance-dept",
+    config={
+        "firstFactors": ["emailpassword", "webauthn"],
+        "requiredSecondaryFactors": ["totp"],
+        "passwordPolicy": {
+            "minLength": 12,
+            "requireUppercase": True,
+            "requireNumbers": True,
+            "requireSpecialChar": True
+        }
+    }
+)
+```
+
+Each tenant can have different authentication methods, security policies, and branding. The finance department might require hardware keys while marketing uses passwordless email links. B2B SaaS platforms can offer enterprise customers their own branded login experiences with custom domains and authentication requirements.
+
+**Role-Based Access Control**
+
+SuperTokens provides flexible RBAC that integrates with existing permission systems. Instead of replacing your authorization infrastructure, it enhances it with modern session management.
+
+```javascript
+// Define and assign roles
+await UserRoles.createNewRoleOrModifyItsPermissions(
+    "financial-analyst", 
+    ["read:financial-reports", "write:forecasts", "approve:small-transactions"]
+);
+
+await UserRoles.addRoleToUser(
+    userId, 
+    "financial-analyst"
+);
+
+// Check permissions in your API
+app.get("/api/financial-reports", verifySession(), async (req, res) => {
+    const roles = await req.session.getClaimValue(UserRoleClaim);
+    
+    if (!roles.includes("financial-analyst")) {
+        return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" });
+    }
+    
+    // Return api data
+});
+```
+
+The permission model supports hierarchical roles, dynamic permissions, and attribute-based access control. Integration with existing LDAP or Active Directory groups enables enterprises to maintain their current role definitions while modernizing authentication.
+
+**Session Management**
+
+SuperTokens implements sophisticated session handling that balances security with user experience. Sessions use rotating refresh tokens that minimize the window for token theft while maintaining seamless access.
+
+The architecture supports enterprise requirements like:
+* Concurrent session limits (users can only log in from N devices)
+* Geographic restrictions (sessions invalid outside approved regions)
+* Time-based access (sessions only valid during business hours)
+* Device binding (sessions locked to specific devices)
+
+**Audit Logs and Compliance**
+
+Every authentication event, permission check, and session action generates detailed audit logs. These aren't just text files; they're structured data ready for analysis.
+
+```json
+{
+    "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:23:45Z",
+    "event": "authentication_success",
+    "userId": "usr_98234jksdf",
+    "tenantId": "finance-dept",
+    "method": "webauthn",
+    "ipAddress": "192.168.1.100",
+    "userAgent": "Mozilla/5.0...",
+    "riskScore": 0.15,
+    "sessionId": "sess_234234mksd",
+    "metadata": {
+        "mfaUsed": true,
+        "deviceTrust": "managed",
+        "location": "headquarters"
+    }
+}
+```
+
+Log forwarding integrations send these events to your SIEM platform, data lake, or compliance systems. Splunk, Datadog, and Elastic integrations are straightforward. Custom webhooks enable integration with any logging infrastructure.
+
+### Developer-First Architecture
+
+SuperTokens recognizes that enterprise developers need to integrate authentication with complex existing systems. The SDK design prioritizes flexibility over simplicity, providing hooks and override points throughout the authentication flow.
+
+```python
+# Override any part of the authentication flow
+def override_email_password_apis(original_implementation):
+    original_sign_up = original_implementation.sign_up
+    
+    async def sign_up(email: str, password: str, tenant_id: str):
+        # Pre-validation with enterprise systems
+        if not await validate_with_hr_system(email):
+            raise Exception("Email not authorized for registration")
+        
+        # Original SuperTokens sign-up
+        result = await original_sign_up(email, password, tenant_id)
+        
+        # Post-processing
+        if result.status == "OK":
+            await provision_enterprise_resources(result.user.user_id)
+            await send_to_training_system(result.user.user_id)
+        
+        return result
+    
+    original_implementation.sign_up = sign_up
+    return original_implementation
+```
+
+This extensibility enables integration with legacy systems, custom business logic, and enterprise workflows without forking the codebase. Need to check SAP for user authorization? Add it to the flow. Want to provision AWS accounts during registration? Insert that logic.
+
+The transparency extends to the database layer. SuperTokens uses straightforward schemas that enterprises can query directly for reporting or integration. No proprietary formats or encrypted blobs hiding critical data.
+
+### Deployment Flexibility
+
+SuperTokens supports every enterprise deployment scenario:
+
+**On-Premise Deployment**
+
+Install SuperTokens Core on your servers, behind your firewall, under your complete control. The system runs on standard Linux distributions without exotic dependencies. Docker containers simplify deployment but aren't required.
+
+**Private Cloud Deployment**
+
+Deploy to your AWS VPC, Azure Virtual Network, or Google Cloud Platform project. SuperTokens works with managed databases (RDS, Cloud SQL) and integrates with cloud-native services. Auto scaling groups handle traffic spikes. Multi-region deployments provide global availability.
+
+**Hybrid Deployment**
+
+Run SuperTokens Core on-premise while using cloud services for specific features. Session storage might use Redis Cloud for performance. Audit logs might stream to cloud analytics platforms. This approach balances control with operational efficiency.
+
+**Managed Cloud Option**
+
+For enterprises wanting authentication without infrastructure management, SuperTokens offers managed hosting. This provides the same features with guaranteed uptime, automatic updates, and professional support. Unlike traditional SaaS, you can migrate to self-hosted anytime, taking your data and configurations with you.
+
+The deployment choice doesn't lock you in. Start with managed cloud for rapid prototyping. Move to self-hosted when regulatory requirements demand it. The architecture remains consistent across all deployment models.
+
+
+## How to Evaluate an Enterprise IAM Solution
+
+Selecting an enterprise IAM platform requires systematic evaluation across multiple dimensions. The wrong choice creates technical debt that compounds for years, while the right platform becomes a strategic enabler for digital transformation.
+
+### Security and Compliance Fit
+
+Start by mapping your regulatory requirements to platform capabilities. Generic "enterprise-grade security" claims mean nothing without specific compliance validations.
+
+**Encryption Standards**
+
+Verify the platform supports your required encryption standards. Financial services often mandate FIPS 140-2 validated cryptography. Healthcare organizations need end-to-end encryption for PHI. Government agencies require specific algorithm suites.
+
+Ask vendors for their cryptographic architecture documentation. Can you configure algorithm choices? How are keys managed and rotated? Where does key material reside? Vague answers indicate the vendor hasn't dealt with serious security requirements.
+
+Test encryption in practice. Deploy a proof of concept and use packet capture to verify that sensitive data is actually encrypted in transit. Check database storage to confirm encryption at rest. Many platforms claim encryption but implement it partially.
+
+**Audit Capabilities**
+
+Compliance isn't just about having logs; it's about having the right logs in usable formats. Your IAM platform must capture:
+* Every authentication attempt with outcome and metadata
+* All permission changes with before/after states
+* Administrative actions with justification
+* Data access patterns for sensitive resources
+
+Run a mock audit during evaluation. Can you produce a report showing every system a specific user accessed last quarter? Can you prove that terminated employees lost access within policy timelines? Can you demonstrate segregation of duties for financial transactions?
+
+The platform should export logs in standard formats (JSON, CEF, LEEF) that your SIEM can parse. Real-time streaming is essential for security monitoring. Batch exports that arrive hours later miss active attacks.
+
+**Compliance Certifications**
+
+Vendor compliance certifications provide baseline assurance but aren't sufficient alone. SOC2 reports confirm operational controls including access management, change management, and incident response. ISO 27001 validates information security management. FedRAMP authorization enables government deployments.
+
+Read the actual audit reports, not just the marketing claims. Check the scope of certification. Some vendors certify only their managed service, not the software you'd self-host. Others exclude critical components from audit scope.
+
+### Customizability
+
+Enterprise authentication involves complex business logic that packaged solutions rarely accommodate. The platform must enable deep customization without becoming unmaintainable.
+
+**Authentication Flow Control**
+
+Can you modify authentication steps based on your requirements? Common customization needs include:
+* Checking external databases before allowing registration
+* Implementing approval workflows for privileged access
+* Adding custom MFA challenges for specific user groups
+* Integrating with fraud detection systems
+
+Request code examples showing how to implement your specific requirements. If the vendor suggests "professional services" for basic customizations, the platform lacks necessary flexibility.
+
+**UI/UX Flexibility**
+
+Users shouldn't know they're using a third-party authentication system. The platform must support complete UI customization or provide headless operation where you build the interface.
+
+Test customization depth. Can you modify individual form fields? Control error messages? Implement custom password strength indicators? Add organization-specific consent flows? Superficial theming isn't enough for enterprise deployments.
+
+**Business Logic Integration**
+
+Authentication doesn't exist in isolation. The platform must integrate with your business processes:
+
+```python
+async def custom_auth_flow(credentials):
+    # Check if user is in good standing with billing
+    if not await billing_system.check_account_status(credentials.email):
+        return AuthError("Account suspended for non-payment")
+    
+    # Verify employment status with HR system
+    if not await hr_system.verify_active_employee(credentials.email):
+        return AuthError("Employment verification failed")
+    
+    # Check for active legal holds
+    if await legal_system.has_active_hold(credentials.email):
+        await legal_system.notify_authentication_attempt(credentials.email)
+    
+    # Continue with standard authentication
+    return await standard_auth_flow(credentials)
+```
+
+The platform should provide hooks, not just configuration options. You need to insert code at decision points, not just toggle features on and off.
+
+### Integration Surface
+
+Your IAM platform must integrate with everything from modern microservices to mainframe applications. Limited integration capabilities create identity silos that undermine the entire IAM strategy.
+
+**Protocol Support**
+
+Inventory your current authentication protocols. That 15-year-old ERP system might only support LDAP. The newly acquired startup uses OAuth everywhere. Partner integrations require SAML. The platform must bridge these protocols seamlessly.
+
+Test actual integrations, not just protocol support claims. Can the platform simultaneously support:
+* SAML 2.0 for enterprise SaaS applications
+* OAuth 2.0/OIDC for modern APIs
+* LDAP for legacy directory services
+* RADIUS for network equipment
+* Kerberos for Windows domains
+
+**API Coverage**
+
+Modern enterprises need programmatic control over identity operations. Evaluate API completeness:
+* Can you create users programmatically?
+* Modify permissions via API calls?
+* Query audit logs through REST endpoints?
+* Receive webhooks for security events?
+
+API rate limits matter at enterprise scale. If the platform throttles at 100 requests per second, bulk operations become impossible. You can't deprovision 10,000 users if each API call takes seconds.
+
+**Application Support**
+
+Create an inventory of your critical applications and verify integration support. Pre-built connectors save months of development time. But "supports Salesforce" might mean basic authentication only, not delegated administration or field-level permissions.
+
+For custom applications, evaluate SDK quality. Are libraries available for your programming languages? Do they follow language conventions? Is the documentation complete with working examples? Poor SDKs multiply integration effort across every application.
+
+### Scalability
+
+Scalability isn't just about user counts. Enterprise IAM must handle burst traffic, geographic distribution, and organizational complexity.
+
+**Performance at Scale**
+
+Get specific performance commitments:
+* Authentication requests per second
+* Concurrent sessions supported
+* Database size limitations
+* API throughput limits
+
+Test with realistic load patterns. Monday morning login storms when 50,000 employees authenticate within minutes. End-of-quarter processing when every system validates permissions continuously. Geographic distribution with users across time zones.
+
+Load testing should include your customizations. That HR system integration might work fine in testing but timeout under load. Custom authorization logic might create database bottlenecks. Find these issues during evaluation, not production deployment.
+
+**Multi-Region Support**
+
+Global enterprises need IAM infrastructure in multiple regions for performance and compliance. Can the platform replicate across regions? How does it handle network partitions? What's the latency impact for users far from primary data centers?
+
+Some platforms claim multi-region support but actually route all authentication through a single region. This creates unacceptable latency for global users and violates data residency requirements.
+
+**Organizational Complexity**
+
+Large enterprises aren't monolithic. They comprise subsidiaries, divisions, and acquired companies, each with unique requirements. The platform must support:
+* Multiple identity sources that might overlap
+* Delegated administration with scope limitations
+* Separate security policies per organization
+* Independent audit trails for compliance
+* Gradual migration from existing systems
+
+Test with your actual organizational structure. Create a proof of concept with multiple tenants, complex permission hierarchies, and delegated administration. If it requires workarounds during evaluation, it won't scale in production.
+
+### Operational Overhead
+
+The best IAM platform becomes a liability if you can't operate it effectively. Evaluate both initial deployment and ongoing maintenance requirements.
+
+**Deployment Complexity**
+
+How long does initial deployment actually take? Vendor estimates assume ideal conditions with dedicated resources and no complications. Reality includes:
+* Integration with dozens of existing systems
+* Data migration from current IAM solutions
+* User training and change management
+* Compliance validation and audit preparation
+
+Get references from similar organizations. How long did their deployment take? What unexpected challenges arose? What would they do differently?
+
+**Maintenance Requirements**
+
+Understand ongoing operational needs:
+* How often do updates release?
+* Can you update without downtime?
+* What breaks during updates?
+* How much testing do updates require?
+
+Self-hosted solutions require infrastructure management. Do you have the expertise to run highly available authentication infrastructure? Can your team debug distributed systems issues at 3 AM? If not, managed services might be worth the premium.
+
+**Skills and Resources**
+
+Assess your team's capabilities honestly. Running Keycloak requires Java expertise and significant infrastructure knowledge. Cloud-native solutions need different skills than on-premise deployments. 
+
+Calculate total operational cost, not just licensing. Include:
+* Infrastructure (servers, storage, networking)
+* Personnel (administrators, developers, support)
+* Training and certification
+* Backup and disaster recovery
+* Security monitoring and incident response
+
+If operational overhead exceeds 40% of total IAM budget, the platform is too complex for your organization. Authentication should enable business, not consume IT resources.
+
+## Best Practices for Enterprise Identity Management
+
+Successful enterprise identity management requires more than deploying technology. These practices, developed through thousands of enterprise implementations, prevent common failures and security incidents.
+
+### Centralize Identity
+
+Identity centralization means establishing a single authoritative source for each user's identity, permissions, and access history. This doesn't require replacing every authentication system immediately, but it demands clear ownership and integration strategies.
+
+Start by identifying authoritative sources for identity data. HR systems typically own employee identities. CRM systems might own customer identities. Partner portals manage vendor access. Document these relationships explicitly:
+
+```yaml
+identity_sources:
+  employees:
+    authoritative_source: Workday
+    sync_frequency: real-time
+    attributes: [employeeId, department, manager, startDate]
+    
+  contractors:
+    authoritative_source: VendorPortal
+    sync_frequency: hourly
+    attributes: [contractorId, company, endDate, sponsor]
+    
+  customers:
+    authoritative_source: Salesforce
+    sync_frequency: daily
+    attributes: [customerId, subscription, accountStatus]
+```
+
+Centralization reduces security incidents by eliminating forgotten accounts. When an employee leaves, deprovisioning happens once at the source and propagates everywhere. No more discovering active accounts months after termination.
+
+Build integration gradually. Start with critical systems that handle sensitive data. Connect new applications to central identity from day one. Legacy systems can maintain local authentication while synchronizing with the central directory. This pragmatic approach avoids multi-year transformation programs that never complete.
+
+Monitor synchronization health continuously. Identity mismatches between systems indicate integration failures that could leave orphaned accounts. Set up alerts for synchronization delays, failed updates, and unexpected account creations.
+
+### Automate User Lifecycle
+
+Manual identity management cannot scale with enterprise growth. Automation must handle the routine while humans manage exceptions.
+
+**HR-Driven Provisioning**
+
+Connect your IAM platform directly to HR systems. When HR marks someone as hired, automation should:
+
+```python
+def on_employee_hired(employee_data):
+    # the base identity
+    user_id = create_user(
+        email=employee_data['email'],
+        name=employee_data['name'],
+        employee_id=employee_data['id']
+    )
+    
+    # Assign core access based on role
+    if employee_data['department'] == 'Engineering':
+        assign_role(user_id, 'developer_base')
+        provision_accounts(user_id, ['github', 'aws', 'jira'])
+    
+    # Schedule additional access
+    schedule_task(
+        date=employee_data['start_date'],
+        action='enable_network_access',
+        user_id=user_id
+    )
+    
+    # Set up review cycles
+    schedule_recurring(
+        frequency='quarterly',
+        action='access_review',
+        user_id=user_id,
+        reviewer=employee_data['manager']
+    )
+```
+
+This automation ensures consistent access grants and eliminates delays that impact productivity. New employees arrive to functioning accounts, not days of IT tickets.
+
+**Just-In-Time Provisioning**
+
+Not all access should be permanent. JIT provisioning grants access when needed and removes it automatically:
+
+* Developers receive production access for deployment windows
+* Auditors get read-only access during review periods
+* Vendors obtain system access for specific maintenance tasks
+
+Implement JIT through approval workflows. Users request access with business justification. Managers approve based on need. Access automatically expires without manual intervention.
+
+**Automated Deprovisioning**
+
+Termination triggers must be immediate and comprehensive. Within minutes of HR processing termination:
+* Disable all authentication methods
+* Revoke active sessions
+* Transfer resource ownership
+* Archive user data per retention policies
+* Generate termination audit report
+
+Build safety mechanisms for critical roles. The CEO's account shouldn't be automatically deleted due to an HR data error. Require additional confirmation for high-impact terminations.
+
+### Implement Strong Authentication by Default
+
+Weak authentication undermines every other security control. Modern enterprises must move beyond passwords as the primary authentication factor.
+
+**Mandatory MFA**
+
+Enable MFA for all users, not just administrators. The cost of universal MFA is negligible compared to breach recovery. But implement it intelligently:
+
+* Start with high-risk users (administrators, finance, executives)
+* Phase in remaining users by department
+* Provide multiple MFA options to accommodate preferences
+* Allow grace periods for enrollment but enforce deadlines
+
+Avoid SMS as the primary MFA method. SIM swapping attacks are too common and too easy. Push notifications, authenticator apps, and hardware keys provide better security.
+
+**Passkeys and WebAuthn**
+
+Passkeys eliminate passwords entirely through public key cryptography. Users authenticate with biometrics or security keys. The technology prevents phishing since credentials are bound to specific domains.
+
+Deploy passkeys for critical applications first:
+* Administrative consoles
+* Financial systems
+* Source code repositories
+* HR platforms
+
+The user experience improves while security strengthens. Users stop managing passwords. IT stops resetting them. Attackers can't phish credentials that don't exist.
+
+**Risk-Based Authentication**
+
+Adjust authentication requirements based on context:
+
+```javascript
+function calculateAuthRequirements(context) {
+    let riskScore = 0;
+    
+    // Location risk
+    if (context.location !== 'corporate_network') riskScore += 30;
+    if (context.country !== user.home_country) riskScore += 40;
+    
+    // Device risk
+    if (!context.device.managed) riskScore += 20;
+    if (context.device.os_version < minimum_version) riskScore += 25;
+    
+    // Behavioral risk
+    if (context.login_time !== user.normal_hours) riskScore += 15;
+    if (context.resource_sensitivity === 'high') riskScore += 35;
+    
+    // Determine requirements
+    if (riskScore > 80) return 'DENY';
+    if (riskScore > 50) return 'MFA_PLUS_APPROVAL';
+    if (riskScore > 20) return 'MFA_REQUIRED';
+    return 'STANDARD_AUTH';
+}
+```
+
+This approach maintains security without frustrating users during routine operations.
+
+### Audit Everything
+
+Comprehensive audit logs support security investigations, compliance requirements, and operational troubleshooting. But collecting logs isn't enough; they must be actionable.
+
+**Structured Logging**
+
+Use consistent, structured formats across all identity operations:
+
+```json
+{
+    "timestamp": "2025-01-15T14:23:45.123Z",
+    "event_type": "permission_change",
+    "actor": {
+        "user_id": "usr_admin_84732",
+        "ip_address": "10.0.1.50",
+        "session_id": "sess_9823jsdf"
+    },
+    "target": {
+        "user_id": "usr_emp_23421",
+        "previous_roles": ["analyst"],
+        "new_roles": ["analyst", "reviewer"]
+    },
+    "justification": "Ticket REQ-8734: Q4 audit support",
+    "approval_chain": ["mgr_3421", "sec_team"],
+    "risk_score": 0.3
+}
+```
+
+Structured logs enable automated analysis. Security tools can detect anomalies. Compliance reports generate automatically. Investigations complete in hours instead of days.
+
+**Real-Time Alerting**
+
+Configure alerts for high-risk events:
+* Administrative privilege grants
+* Mass permission changes
+* Authentication from sanctioned countries
+* Dormant account reactivation
+* Service account usage outside normal patterns
+
+But avoid alert fatigue. Too many false positives train staff to ignore warnings. Tune thresholds based on actual patterns, not vendor defaults.
+
+**Retention and Archival**
+
+Balance compliance requirements with storage costs:
+* Authentication logs: 90 days hot, 1 year warm, 7 years cold
+* Permission changes: 1 year hot, 7 years cold
+* Administrative actions: 7 years hot
+* Read access logs: 30 days hot, 90 days cold
+
+Use tiered storage effectively. Recent logs in fast SSD storage support investigations. Historical logs in object storage satisfy compliance at lower cost.
+
+### Review Roles Regularly
+
+Permission accumulation is identity management's silent killer. Users collect access over years through role changes, special projects, and temporary needs. Regular reviews prevent this drift.
+
+**Quarterly Access Reviews**
+
+Every quarter, managers should certify their team's access:
+
+1. System generates report of each employee's current access
+2. Managers review and mark each permission as justified or excessive
+3. Unjustified access is automatically revoked after grace period
+4. Non-responses escalate to senior management
+
+Make reviews manageable. Showing managers 500 granular permissions creates review fatigue. Group related permissions into business-friendly bundles. "Salesforce Standard User" is reviewable. Individual object permissions are not.
+
+**Role Mining and Optimization**
+
+Analyze actual permission usage to optimize role definitions:
+
+```sql
+-- Find users with similar access patterns
+SELECT 
+    COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) as user_count,
+    GROUP_CONCAT(permission) as permission_set
+FROM user_permissions
+GROUP BY permission_set
+HAVING user_count > 10
+ORDER BY user_count DESC;
+```
+
+This analysis reveals common access patterns that should become formal roles. It also identifies over-provisioned users who have permissions they never use.
+
+**Automated Cleanup**
+
+Implement automatic revocation for clearly obsolete access:
+* Remove access unused for 90+ days
+* Revoke project-specific permissions after project completion
+* Delete service accounts with expired certificates
+* Disable contractor access past contract end dates
+
+These automated cleanups reduce the review burden while improving security posture. Manual reviews can then focus on nuanced decisions that require human judgment.
+
+## Conclusion
+
+Enterprise identity management has evolved from simple username/password systems to complex platforms orchestrating access across thousands of applications, driven by sophisticated threats, stringent compliance requirements, and operational scales that make manual management impossible. Successful enterprise IAM requires choosing the right platform based on security fit, customizability, integration capabilities, scalability, and operational overhead. SuperTokens offers a compelling approach through its open-source foundation, modular architecture, and self-hosting capabilities that adapt to existing infrastructure rather than forcing you into a vendor's model. Your identity management strategy determines whether authentication enables or constrains your business, so make it a strategic advantage, not an operational burden.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/static/blog-seo/config.json b/static/blog-seo/config.json
index b7fa3710..59795787 100644
--- a/static/blog-seo/config.json
+++ b/static/blog-seo/config.json
@@ -4403,5 +4403,28 @@
         ],
         "title": "SuperTokens Launch Week 02: 7 Open-Source Auth Plugins",
         "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/launch-week-02-open-source-auth-plugins\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Open-source auth plugins you’ll reuse: profiling, banning, CAPTCHA, tenancy tools, and telemetry. React/Node ready. \",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/launch-week-02-open-source-auth-plugins.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
+    },
+    {
+        "path": "/blog/enterprise-identity-management",
+        "metaTags": [
+            "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore how enterprise identity management works, the challenges it solves, and what features modern orgs need for secure, scalable access control.\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"Authentication, Open Source, Authorization, User Management, OAuth, Enterprise SSO, Security\" />",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Enterprise Identity Management What You Need to Know in 2025\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/enterprise-identity-management\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore how enterprise identity management works, the challenges it solves, and what features modern orgs need for secure, scalable access control.\"/>",
+            "<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explore how enterprise identity management works, the challenges it solves, and what features modern orgs need for secure, scalable access control.\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/enterprise-identity-management\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" /> ",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/enterprise-identity-management\">"
+        ],
+        "title": "Enterprise Identity Management What You Need to Know in 2025",
+        "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/enterprise-identity-management\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Explore how enterprise identity management works, the challenges it solves, and what features modern orgs need for secure, scalable access control.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
     }
 ]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json b/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
index 2922fd29..2fe5b0d6 100644
--- a/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
+++ b/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
@@ -457,5 +457,8 @@
     },
     {
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/launch-week-02-open-source-auth-plugins"
+    },
+    {
+        "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/enterprise-identity-management"
     }
 ]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/static/card_covers/EIM.png b/static/card_covers/EIM.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..98ba6221
Binary files /dev/null and b/static/card_covers/EIM.png differ
diff --git a/static/covers/EIM.png b/static/covers/EIM.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..98ba6221
Binary files /dev/null and b/static/covers/EIM.png differ