-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Open
Description
The blue and red graph should be the same, but they differ with 0-10% depending on day.
Elimination of possible error sources
- Correct
SRIDof raster. The raster is in correctSRID. Vector mask is transformed correctly from4326to3857, and vector- and raster mask yield same result. Also, all rasters aregdal_transformedtoSRID 3857on import. - Correct
pixel valuesof raster. Since vector- and raster mask yield same results, there's likely nothing wrong with the raster mask per se. - Correct
pixel scaleof raster. The scale differ between the mask and the snow-rasters. - Calculation. Adding the
SCF_0.tif, SCF_160.tif, SCF_200.tifyield correct graph calculations of respectively0%, 60%, 100%, which means there's nothing wrong with the calc method.

- Include correct values in calculation. Values
100-200are included, which has been thrice confirmed by Eirik. - Use
floatnumbers. Still same results. - IMPROVEMENT: Only use part of mask which have values > 0.
Darkest red line is with0values of mask excluded.

- Vannmaske. Count the 20 values...
Suspicions
The difference between G—/Systemapic calcs is the least when there's most snow (ref. 20th Jan).
- If the mask was faulty (say, wrong SRID), then this would have the least effect when there's a lot of snow (with coverage going all the say to the coast, for example, and lots of area being 100%).
- So this perhaps indicates that there's something wrong - not with the calculation - but with the mask (or the watermask, perhaps).
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels