ADR data issues

[priyamvadatrivedi]

have a look at this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1693s7CuiL22Cvh_xHArpJNPA_E7DgRRFc2opAMmWtM0/edit?usp=sharing

1. there are assemblies for which a large part of the data is "unknown" or/and "other". i hope these 2 are different categories.
2. need to decide whether we want the graphs where a large part of the data is "unknown" or/and "other". is this because it wasn't digitized to begin with? its not comparable where we have more information so should these be up there to begin with?
3. where most of data is "unknown" or/and "other", it needs to be also mentioned in the documentation and reasons why its the case. it can go in the Appendix.
4. "unknown", "other", "unspecified", "not given" --> need for standardization across values. you can combine "unknown", "unspecified", and "not given" assuming they represent the same things i.e., blank cells
5. Lok Sabha 14 & 15 - large part of the data is unknown - should we drop them as the graphs don't mean much anyways?

[blusoulna]

1. Yes - Other in Education includes religious or traditional education, Other in Profession is whatever doesn't fit the existing cateogories..
2. The blanks are dependent on what's available on ADR
3. We can have a table specifying which assembly onwards these values are available
4. Will do
5. Based on 3, we can have graphs for just those assemblies

[blusoulna]

@mohitkharb - I have made the updates

[blusoulna]

Marking for testing

[priyamvadatrivedi]

@blusoulna did you update the documentation with the table showing for which assemblies we have data?

latest LD documentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ACxjQoivH8OGHd6HjZNczwJpP4OYzQYDnZpAczwhl58/edit