-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
RFC: Trust Score Algorithm - Seeking Expert Critique #2
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
architecture-reviewArchitecture and design reviewArchitecture and design reviewhelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is needed
Description
TRAIL assigns trust scores to AI agent DIDs based on verification depth, credential history, and endorsements. We need critique on:
- Is the scoring model gameable? - Can an attacker inflate trust through automated credential farming?
- How should trust decay over time? - Static scores vs. time-weighted, activity-based decay curves.
- What's the right balance between automated and human-verified trust signals?
Edge cases to consider:
- Newly created agents (cold start problem)
- Agents migrating between platforms
- Revoked-then-reinstated credentials
Background: TRAIL is designed for EU AI Act compliance - trust scores must be auditable and explainable.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
architecture-reviewArchitecture and design reviewArchitecture and design reviewhelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is needed