Run tests on CI

[ulgens]

There is an open PR from @rhblind that tries to implement a CI: #189. I extracted usable parts from that PR, improved/adapted them in a way I see fit, and merged to main, except the main "tests" workflow.

I created #226 to extract test CI-related work, but I couldn't complete it.

• I was having issues with the tox setup that I couldn't really understand. It looks like the original work was intending to replicate the setup from https://github.com/django-haystack/django-haystack/blob/f6173994ea4e87b7d6a430cecc346b046d7011e8/.github/workflows/test.yml, but it somehow ends up with missing dependencies in this repo.
• tox-free version of the workflow fails with multiple test errors: https://github.com/ulgens/drf-haystack/actions/runs/20763867026/job/59625371809

I already spent more time on this setup than I was willing to do, so I'm adding the "help wanted" label.

[ulgens]

@DhavalGojiya Would you be interested in helping with this?

[DhavalGojiya]

@DhavalGojiya Would you be interested in helping with this?

I find tox a bit complicated and heavy.
We can instead use Github Matrix to achieve the same thing.

[ulgens]

I find tox a bit complicated and heavy.
We can instead use Github Matrix to achieve the same thing.

I feel the same, and the latest version of the related PR doesn't use tox in CI. I'm still curious about why tox setup doesn't work, but I'm open to merge a working test setup without tox.

[DhavalGojiya]

I feel the same, and the latest version of the related PR doesn't use tox in CI. I'm still curious about why tox setup doesn't work, but I'm open to merge a working test setup without tox.

I doubt that this package was ever tested using the test cases currently written.

[ulgens]

I doubt that this package was ever tested using the test cases currently written.

It's even more reason for the "help wanted" label 😄 Please feel free to fix/improve existing tests.