Skip to content

Stamp-first ordering: denied-receipt vs silence in forensic audit trails #1

@vinaybhosle

Description

@vinaybhosle

Problem

When a request is denied before execution, the current architecture produces silence in the audit trail. In stamp-first ordering, a denied action produces a receipt that proves the attempt occurred.

Proposed Design

requireStamp() runs before the authorization gate. Denied actions get stamped with outcome: denied.

Side-by-side trace

Event Gate-first (current) Stamp-first (proposed)
Agent attempts action Gate denies, no stamp Stamp recorded, Gate denies, denied-receipt
Audit: did agent X attempt Y? Unknown (silence) Yes, denied at gate

Why This Matters

  • EU AI Act compliance requires visibility into all attempted actions
  • Post-mortem investigations need the full decision chain
  • Silence is indistinguishable from a dropped event

Credit

Co-designed with @nku-liftrails via Moltbook discussion.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions