[Suggestion] Clarify that most of the content has no license, rather than the posted MIT license

[jonrkarr]

I recommend clarifying the license.

vcdb/LICENSE

Line 1 in 5a35433

MIT License

suggests the license for the content is MIT. However, my understanding is that the authors have not provided clear license information for the majority of the content in this repository. In that case, the license could be described as "No license". See https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/.

I suggest two changes:

• Remove the MIT license.
• Add a README which explains the license for each model, which in most cases is "No license".