-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Description
Delley's paper on numerical atomic orbital calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508 (1990), states employing a partition function (eq. 3)
where "preferred choices are the functions"
-
$g_A = \rho_{A}^2(r)$ , -
$g_A = \rho_{A}^2(r) / r^2$ , and $g_A = \rho_{A}(r) [\exp(r_0/r) - 1 - r_0/r] $
where
Delley writes
These partition functions automatically depend on atom sizes via
$p_A$ and have given consistently good results for all sorts of compounds including heteronuclear compounds containing heavy transition metals and light elements including hydrogen. The last function leads to continuous vanishing of all partition functions and all their derivatives on all nuclei where they are not centered.
These schemes are clearly similar to Becke's, and should be quite easy to implement. The only thing necessary are just the atomic electron densities. The adaptive Molpro grid wavefunction91/GauXC#51 implementation of J. Chem. Phys. 157, 234106 (2022) employed Slater atomic densities:
In Ref. 79, these are defined for elements up to
$n = 6$ with effective principal numbers of$n^\star = 3.7$ , 4.0, 4.2 for$n = 4, 5, 6$ . The implementation in Molpro uses$n^\star = 4.4$ for seventh row elements based on a simple linear extrapolation of the$n^\star$ values given by Leach.79 The advantage of using Slater’s densities over tabulated numerical densities is that they are given analytically and can be easily computed at any given grid point.