Remove untested penalty-based 3D multipoint constraint#1774
Conversation
|
@m-frey @isteinbrecher @eulovi What's your take on this? |
|
This functionality is duplicative here anyway, as it is also implemented in the |
Remove the condition DESIGN SURFACE NORMALDIR MULTIPNT CONSTRAINT 3D PEN as it is untested.
6727b3d to
df3198a
Compare
I have never used this functionality, so I am fine with removing it. |
I am also fine removing this, as I don't use this functionality. |
|
Nice, thanks for your feedback! I fixed the failing pipeline, so this would be ready from my side 😃 |
|
@ischeider are you using this ? |
|
Can I get a second review here, please? |
Description and Context
The condition
DESIGN SURFACE NORMALDIR MULTIPNT CONSTRAINT 3D PENis not tested.We should either test it or remove it. Most multipoint constraints implemented within the
constraintframework don't work with theStandardstructural time integration (see #210 (comment)). So - even when testing it - we would need to fix some things there when moving to theStandardstructural time integration.I thus suggest to remove the condition, if there are no objections.
We have still have
DESIGN POINT COUPLING CONDITION(that also works with theStandardstructural time integration) andDESIGN SURFACE NORMALDIR MULTIPNT CONSTRAINT 3D(currently only working withOld.