Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 55eabffd00
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| config_file_prefix = str(manifest_payload.get("config_file_prefix", "agents")) | ||
| manifest_names = set() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new manifest-path check is self-referential: it derives config_file_prefix from the manifest being validated and then checks each config_path against that same value, so a drifted manifest can still pass validation if both fields are edited together. In validate_codex_subagents.py flows this allows projection_manifest.json to claim paths like foo/*.toml while config.subagents.generated.toml still points at agents/*.toml, which breaks downstream consumers that plan from the manifest (aoa-sdk child-target planning) even though validation reports success.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Publishes the current-session Wave5 A2A return checkpoint changes for this repository. Direct main push was blocked by protected-branch Release Audit, so this PR carries the same fast-forward commits through the required review path.\n\nPublic-share guard was acknowledged by the explicit merge request, and sanitization review found no strong credential patterns or suspicious secret-like filenames in the ahead diff.