Skip to content

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot commented Nov 19, 2025

OpenAPI spec files or templates have been modified on 04-12-2025 by commit.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers an automated update to the generated Java client for Adyen's ACS Webhooks, Balance Control, and Balance Platform APIs. The primary goal is to synchronize the client code with the latest API specifications, ensuring all models and services reflect the most current definitions. A significant improvement includes refined handling of polymorphic types in bank account identification, which strengthens data parsing capabilities. Additionally, the update brings general code formatting and Javadoc improvements across the codebase.

Highlights

  • Code Generation Update: This pull request incorporates the latest changes from the OpenAPI specification files and templates, ensuring the generated code is up-to-date with the most recent API definitions for ACS Webhooks, Balance Control, and Balance Platform services.
  • Improved Polymorphic Deserialization: The deserialization logic for BankAccountAccountIdentification within the Balance Platform API has been enhanced to correctly handle polymorphic types, allowing for more robust parsing of various local bank account identification schemas based on their type field.
  • Code Formatting and Javadoc Enhancements: Numerous files across all updated services have received minor formatting adjustments, including reordering of import statements, whitespace normalization, and updates to Javadoc comments for improved readability and consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request contains auto-generated code updates, primarily consisting of formatting changes, Javadoc updates, and reordering of imports across numerous model and service files. The changes appear to be the result of running a code generation tool with updated templates. I have reviewed the diffs and found no functional changes or issues. The code modifications are benign and improve code style consistency.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 5 times, most recently from 4daf260 to 4a36026 Compare November 25, 2025 09:13
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 3 times, most recently from dfa8eb5 to eea23e2 Compare December 4, 2025 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants