Skip to content

Conversation

@slwu89
Copy link
Member

@slwu89 slwu89 commented Mar 6, 2024

Address #888

Please note the changes to https://github.com/AlgebraicJulia/Catlab.jl/pull/895/files#diff-77b8985182dac144d246a8e8f0becf17233222f79879274682b78adf2e454ca4 I suspect it was a typo that some small subset of the generic bipartite graph methods have argument type AbstractBipartiteGraph rather than HasBipartiteGraph (a narrower type instead of a wider type), so I changed that.

@slwu89 slwu89 requested a review from epatters March 7, 2024 00:06
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the development guidelines? Following is a partial checklist:

Tests

  • New features and bug fixes have unit tests
  • New modules have tests that are ultimately called by the test runner (test/runtests.jl)
  • Existing tests have not been deleted
  • Code coverage >= 90% or reduction justified in PR

Documentation

  • All exported functions, types, and constants have docstrings, written in complete sentences
  • Citations are given for any constructions, algorithms, or code drawn from external sources

Other

  • Style guidelines are followed, including indent width 2
  • Changes breaking backwards compatibility have been approved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants