added all logging middleware files #42
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds zerolog-based structured request logging middleware, wires it into the Gin router, and updates gateway dependencies; also introduces health endpoints and payment verification types/flows in the gateway entrypoint. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant G as Gateway
participant L as Logger
participant H as Handler
rect rgba(240, 248, 255, 0.5)
C->>G: HTTP request
G->>L: enter RequestLogger
L->>L: record start time / capture headers
L->>H: forward request
H-->>L: response (status, context vals)
L->>L: compute latency_ms, collect client_ip, payment_verified, user_wallet
L->>L: emit JSON log to stdout
L-->>C: return response
end
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant GW as Gateway
participant VS as Verifier Service
participant OR as OpenRouter
rect rgba(255, 240, 245, 0.5)
C->>GW: /api/ai/summarize (may include payment headers)
alt Missing payment headers
GW-->>C: 402 + PaymentContext payload
else Has payment headers
GW->>VS: POST /verify (VerifyRequest)
alt Verifier returns valid
VS-->>GW: VerifyResponse(valid)
GW->>GW: mark payment_verified, store user_wallet
GW->>OR: callOpenRouter (AI request)
OR-->>GW: AI response
GW-->>C: 200 + summary (+ receipt headers)
else Verifier returns invalid
VS-->>GW: VerifyResponse(invalid)
GW-->>C: 403 Forbidden
else Verifier timeout/error
VS--xGW: error/timeout
GW-->>C: 504 Gateway Timeout
end
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Additional Comments (5)
-
gateway/main.go, line 56-91 (link)syntax: Duplicate function declarations:
main()is declared twice (lines 56 and 73). The first incomplete declaration starting at line 56 needs to be removed. Additionally, line 57 has invalid code:_ = godotenv.Load("../.env")which doesn't match the pattern below. -
gateway/main.go, line 182-232 (link)syntax: Duplicate/conflicting code blocks for payment verification. Lines 183-194 attempt one approach, then lines 198-232 redefine the same logic. The code at lines 209-232 is the newer version but lines 183-194 should be completely removed as they're outdated and create duplicate code paths.
Remove lines 183-194 entirely (the incomplete first attempt).
-
gateway/main.go, line 262-263 (link)syntax: Decode errors ignored: The JSON decode error is discarded with
_. This suppresses potential parsing errors from the verifier response. It should check for errors: -
gateway/main.go, line 335-342 (link)syntax: Incomplete function definition:
callOpenRouter(text string)at line 335 is incomplete and conflicts with the proper definition at line 342. Line 335-337 should be removed entirely as it doesn't include thecontext.Contextparameter and is overwritten below: -
gateway/main.go, line 380-383 (link)logic: Removed critical response parsing logic: The response from OpenRouter is no longer parsed to extract the actual summary. Previously (removed lines), the code extracted
result["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]to get the actual AI response. Now it just returns a hardcoded"stub summary"string, meaning the AI response is completely ignored and users always get a placeholder response.The AI parsing logic must be restored to actually return the model's output:
6 files reviewed, 5 comments
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @gateway/main.go:
- Around line 198-212: Remove the duplicate, incomplete verification block that
constructs verifyReq and calls http.Post (the code that creates verifyReq, does
body, _ := json.Marshal(...), then resp, err := http.Post(...), and its
immediate error branch), and retain only the subsequent correct implementation
that uses a context with timeout; ensure you do not leave duplicate declarations
of verifyReq, body, or signature and that imports/variables used by the
remaining context-with-timeout implementation remain unchanged.
- Line 263: The JSON decode error from
json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) is being ignored, which can hide
malformed verifier responses and cause verifyResp.IsValid to default false;
update the code to capture the Decode error into a variable, check it, and
handle it (log the error with context and body contents if helpful, and return
or propagate an error instead of proceeding), ensuring any non-nil decode error
triggers a clear failure path rather than silently treating the payment as
invalid.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (3)
gateway/main.go (3)
56-72: Critical: Duplicate/orphaned function declarations causing syntax errors.Lines 56-72 contain an orphaned
_ = godotenv.Load("../.env")statement and avalidateConfig()function definition that appears to be misplaced before anothermain()function on line 73. This will cause compilation errors.This looks like a merge conflict or incomplete refactoring. The code from lines 56-72 should either be removed or properly integrated.
🔎 Proposed fix - remove orphaned code
-func main() { - _ = godotenv.Load("../.env") func validateConfig() error { required := []string{ "OPENROUTER_API_KEY",Move
validateConfig()outside of anymain()block and ensure only onemain()function exists.
183-196: Critical: Duplicate payment context code blocks.Lines 183-188 and 189-195 contain duplicate logic for handling missing payment headers. This appears to be remnants of a merge conflict:
c.Set("payment_verified", false) ctx := createPaymentContext() c.JSON(402, gin.H{...}) // Then immediately followed by: paymentContext := createPaymentContext() c.JSON(402, gin.H{...})Only one of these blocks should remain.
🔎 Proposed fix
if signature == "" || nonce == "" { c.Set("payment_verified", false) - - ctx := createPaymentContext() - c.JSON(402, gin.H{ - "error": "Payment Required", - "paymentContext": ctx, paymentContext := createPaymentContext() c.JSON(402, gin.H{ "error": "Payment Required", "message": "Please sign the payment context", "paymentContext": paymentContext, }) return }
335-384: Critical: Duplicate function signatures and stub return value.Multiple issues in
callOpenRouter:
Duplicate signatures: Line 335 declares
callOpenRouter(text string)while line 342 declarescallOpenRouter(ctx context.Context, text string). Only one can exist.Stub return: Line 383 returns
"stub summary"instead of the actual AI response. The code builds and sends the request but never extracts the result fromresult.🔎 Proposed fix
-func callOpenRouter(text string) (string, error) { - if text == "" { - return "", fmt.Errorf("empty text") func callOpenRouter(ctx context.Context, text string) (string, error) { + if text == "" { + return "", fmt.Errorf("empty text") + } apiKey := os.Getenv("OPENROUTER_API_KEY") // ... rest of implementation ... - return "stub summary", nil + // Extract summary from OpenRouter response + choices, ok := result["choices"].([]interface{}) + if !ok || len(choices) == 0 { + return "", fmt.Errorf("no choices in AI response") + } + choice, ok := choices[0].(map[string]interface{}) + if !ok { + return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid choice format") + } + message, ok := choice["message"].(map[string]interface{}) + if !ok { + return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid message format") + } + content, ok := message["content"].(string) + if !ok { + return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid content format") + } + return content, nil }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
gateway/middleware/logger.go (1)
46-54: Consider dynamic log level based on response status and conditional field inclusion.Two suggestions for improvement:
Log level: Currently all requests log at
Infolevel. Consider usingWarnorErrorfor 4xx/5xx responses for better filtering in log aggregators.Null fields: When
payment_verifiedoruser_walletare not set, they'll appear asnullin JSON output, adding noise. Consider only including these fields when they have values.🔎 Proposed improvement
- log.Info(). + event := log.Info() + if c.Writer.Status() >= 500 { + event = log.Error() + } else if c.Writer.Status() >= 400 { + event = log.Warn() + } + + event. Str("method", c.Request.Method). Str("path", c.Request.URL.Path). Int("status", c.Writer.Status()). Int64("latency_ms", latency.Milliseconds()). - Str("client_ip", c.ClientIP()). - Interface("payment_verified", paymentVerified). - Interface("user_wallet", userWallet). - Msg("request completed") + Str("client_ip", c.ClientIP()) + + if paymentVerified != nil { + event.Interface("payment_verified", paymentVerified) + } + if userWallet != nil { + event.Interface("user_wallet", userWallet) + } + + event.Msg("request completed")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
gateway/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
gateway/go.modgateway/main.gogateway/middleware/logger.gogo.mod
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
gateway/main.go (2)
gateway/middleware/logger.go (2)
InitLogger(13-30)RequestLogger(33-56)src/services/payment.ts (1)
PaymentContext(8-14)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
gateway/middleware/logger.go (1)
12-30: LGTM - Robust log level initialization.The implementation correctly:
- Reads
LOG_LEVELfrom environment with sensible default- Gracefully handles invalid log level values by falling back to
InfoLevel- Configures structured JSON output to stdout with timestamps
This meets the PR requirements for configurable log levels.
gateway/main.go (3)
117-124: LGTM - Clean middleware integration.Good approach using
gin.New()with explicit middleware registration rather thangin.Default(). The order is correct:
gin.Recovery()for panic handlingmiddleware.RequestLogger()to capture all requestsThis ensures all requests are logged, including those that panic.
166-171: LGTM - Simple health check endpoint.Appropriate health check implementation with its own shorter timeout (2s). Returns minimal payload suitable for load balancer/container orchestration health probes.
271-272: LGTM - Payment context properly set for logging.Setting
payment_verifiedanduser_walletin the Gin context allows theRequestLoggermiddleware to capture these values in the structured logs, meeting the PR requirement to include payment verification context.go.mod (1)
1-10: Go version mismatch between modules.The root
go.moduses Go 1.25.5 whilegateway/go.moduses Go 1.24.4. If this is a workspace configuration, clarify whether the version difference is intentional. The indirect dependency markings in the rootgo.modare correct since the module contains no direct code; thegatewaymodule properly declareszerologas a direct dependency since it imports it.gateway/go.mod (1)
10-10: LGTM — zerolog v1.34.0 is the latest version and a solid choice for structured JSON logging.zerolog is a well-established, performant structured logging library that aligns well with the PR's JSON log output objectives.
| verifyReq := VerifyRequest{ | ||
| Context: PaymentContext{ | ||
| Recipient: getRecipientAddress(), | ||
| Token: "USDC", | ||
| Amount: getPaymentAmount(), | ||
| Nonce: nonce, | ||
| ChainID: getChainID(), | ||
| }, | ||
| Signature: signature, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| body, _ := json.Marshal(verifyReq) | ||
| resp, err := http.Post("http://127.0.0.1:3002/verify", "application/json", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Duplicate verification request code - remove the first block.
Lines 198-212 contain an incomplete verification request implementation using http.Post without timeout handling. This is followed by the correct implementation on lines 214-260 that properly uses context with timeout.
Remove the first block (lines 198-212) and keep only the second implementation.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @gateway/main.go around lines 198-212, Remove the duplicate, incomplete
verification block that constructs verifyReq and calls http.Post (the code that
creates verifyReq, does body, _ := json.Marshal(...), then resp, err :=
http.Post(...), and its immediate error branch), and retain only the subsequent
correct implementation that uses a context with timeout; ensure you do not leave
duplicate declarations of verifyReq, body, or signature and that
imports/variables used by the remaining context-with-timeout implementation
remain unchanged.
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "Failed to decode verification response"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| _ = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Silently ignoring JSON decode error can mask verification failures.
The decode error is discarded with _ = json.NewDecoder(...). If the verifier returns malformed JSON or an unexpected response, verifyResp.IsValid defaults to false, causing legitimate payments to fail without any indication of the actual problem.
🔎 Proposed fix
- _ = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp)
+ if err := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp); err != nil {
+ log.Printf("error decoding verifier response: %v", err)
+ c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "Invalid verifier response"})
+ return
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _ = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) | |
| if err := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp); err != nil { | |
| log.Printf("error decoding verifier response: %v", err) | |
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "Invalid verifier response"}) | |
| return | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @gateway/main.go around line 263, The JSON decode error from
json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) is being ignored, which can hide
malformed verifier responses and cause verifyResp.IsValid to default false;
update the code to capture the Decode error into a variable, check it, and
handle it (log the error with context and body contents if helpful, and return
or propagate an error instead of proceeding), ensuring any non-nil decode error
triggers a clear failure path rather than silently treating the payment as
invalid.
|
@magic-peach |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
gateway/main.go (4)
62-78: Critical: Malformedmain()function causes compilation failure.Lines 62-63 start a
main()function but immediately definevalidateConfig()inside it without closing the firstmain(). Go does not support nested function definitions.Remove the incomplete
main()stub (lines 62-63) and keepvalidateConfig()as a standalone function.🔧 Proposed fix
-func main() { - _ = godotenv.Load("../.env") func validateConfig() error { required := []string{ "OPENROUTER_API_KEY",
253-269: Critical: Duplicate and malformed payment verification blocks.Lines 253-260 contain incomplete code that conflicts with the proper implementation in lines 261-269:
- Line 257-259 start a
c.JSON(402, ...)but line 260 has an orphanedpaymentContext := createPaymentContext()- Lines 261-269 duplicate the same check
Keep the logging context setup (
c.Set("payment_verified", false)) but merge it into a single coherent block.🔧 Proposed fix
if signature == "" || nonce == "" { c.Set("payment_verified", false) - - ctx := createPaymentContext() - c.JSON(402, gin.H{ - "error": "Payment Required", - "paymentContext": ctx, - paymentContext := createPaymentContext() - // Basic check - if signature == "" || nonce == "" { c.JSON(402, gin.H{ "error": "Payment Required", "message": "Please sign the payment context", "paymentContext": createPaymentContext(), }) return }
523-577: Critical: DuplicatecallOpenRouterfunction definitions prevent compilation.Two conflicting function definitions exist:
- Lines 523-527:
callOpenRouter(text string)- incomplete stub- Lines 530-601:
callOpenRouter(ctx context.Context, text string)- full implementationAdditionally, line 577 has
return "stub summary", nilwhich would bypass the actual AI response parsing (lines 579-600).Remove the stub (lines 523-527) and the premature return (line 577).
🔧 Proposed fix
-func callOpenRouter(text string) (string, error) { - if text == "" { - return "", fmt.Errorf("empty text") // callOpenRouter sends the given text to the OpenRouter chat completions API // requesting a two-sentence summary and returns the generated summary.And remove the stub return:
if err := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&result); err != nil { return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to decode AI response: %w", err) } - return "stub summary", nil choices, ok := result["choices"].([]interface{})
1-33: Fix function declaration structure: remove incomplete main function and nested declarations.The file has
func validateConfig()incorrectly nested inside an incompletefunc main()on line 62-63. Functions cannot be defined inside other function bodies. Remove lines 62-63 (the incomplete first main declaration), and keepvalidateConfigas a package-level function. The secondfunc main()starting at line 79 appears to be the intended entry point.
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@gateway/main.go`:
- Around line 232-237: The function handleHealth is defined but never
referenced; either delete handleHealth to remove dead code or swap its usage
with the currently used handleHealthz in the router so the /healthz endpoint
calls handleHealth instead; locate the router registration that references
handleHealthz and either replace that symbol with handleHealth or remove the
unused handleHealth function accordingly.
- Around line 126-131: The code declares the Gin router twice causing a
compilation error and duplicate logging; remove the second declaration `r :=
gin.Default()` and keep the first `r := gin.New()` with the middleware chain
(`gin.Recovery()` and `middleware.RequestLogger()`); ensure only the single `r`
variable initialized by `gin.New()` remains and that
`middleware.RequestLogger()` is not duplicated by Gin's default logger.
- Around line 464-474: The AI timeout handling currently inside
generateAndSendReceipt is misplaced; remove the block that checks for
context.DeadlineExceeded and the extra c.JSON calls so generateAndSendReceipt
only handles receipt encoding errors (leave the single c.JSON(500,
{"error":"Failed to encode receipt"}) and proper return) and move or re-add the
timeout handling into handleSummarize where AI requests are made (check for
errors.Is(err, context.DeadlineExceeded) and c.Request.Context().Err()). Ensure
you eliminate the multiple sequential c.JSON calls and that each branch returns
immediately after writing a single response.
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
gateway/main.go (2)
271-285: Remove duplicate verification request block.This block duplicates the verification logic that's properly implemented in
verifyPayment()(lines 361-434). Thehttp.Postcall here lacks timeout handling, while the correct implementation usescontext.WithTimeout.
414-431: Critical: Orphaned code references undefinedc(gin.Context) inverifyPayment.Lines 414-428 reference
c.Set()andc.JSON(), butverifyPayment()only receivesctx context.Context, not a gin.Context. This causes undefined variable compilation errors.Additionally, line 414 ignores the decode error (flagged in past review). Remove lines 414-428 and keep only the correct implementation (lines 429-431).
🔧 Proposed fix
- _ = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) - - if !verifyResp.IsValid { - c.Set("payment_verified", false) - c.JSON(403, gin.H{"error": "invalid signature"}) - return - } - - c.Set("payment_verified", true) - c.Set("user_wallet", verifyResp.RecoveredAddress) - - var req SummarizeRequest - if err := c.BindJSON(&req); err != nil { - c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": "invalid body"}) - return if err := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp); err != nil { return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("decode verification response: %w", err) }
|
@AnkanMisra please merge this |
|
@magic-peach Bro what? |
|
@greptile review the pr |
| r := gin.New() | ||
| r.Use( | ||
| gin.Recovery(), | ||
| middleware.RequestLogger(), | ||
| ) | ||
| r := gin.Default() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict: gin.New() is configured correctly on lines 126-130, then immediately replaced with gin.Default() on line 131. The second assignment will overwrite the custom middleware setup.
| r := gin.New() | |
| r.Use( | |
| gin.Recovery(), | |
| middleware.RequestLogger(), | |
| ) | |
| r := gin.Default() | |
| // Init structured logging | |
| middleware.InitLogger() | |
| r := gin.New() | |
| r.Use( | |
| gin.Recovery(), | |
| middleware.RequestLogger(), | |
| ) |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 126:131
Comment:
Merge conflict: `gin.New()` is configured correctly on lines 126-130, then immediately replaced with `gin.Default()` on line 131. The second assignment will overwrite the custom middleware setup.
```suggestion
// Init structured logging
middleware.InitLogger()
r := gin.New()
r.Use(
gin.Recovery(),
middleware.RequestLogger(),
)
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| @@ -235,6 +268,22 @@ func handleSummarize(c *gin.Context) { | |||
| return | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict: incomplete payment verification logic duplicated with syntax errors. Line 260 declares ctx but tries to assign paymentContext (undefined), and lines 261-269 duplicate the logic from lines 262-268.
| signature := c.GetHeader("X-402-Signature") | |
| nonce := c.GetHeader("X-402-Nonce") | |
| if signature == "" || nonce == "" { | |
| c.Set("payment_verified", false) | |
| c.JSON(402, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "Payment Required", | |
| "message": "Please sign the payment context", | |
| "paymentContext": createPaymentContext(), | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 253:269
Comment:
Merge conflict: incomplete payment verification logic duplicated with syntax errors. Line 260 declares `ctx` but tries to assign `paymentContext` (undefined), and lines 261-269 duplicate the logic from lines 262-268.
```suggestion
signature := c.GetHeader("X-402-Signature")
nonce := c.GetHeader("X-402-Nonce")
if signature == "" || nonce == "" {
c.Set("payment_verified", false)
c.JSON(402, gin.H{
"error": "Payment Required",
"message": "Please sign the payment context",
"paymentContext": createPaymentContext(),
})
return
}
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| verifyReq := VerifyRequest{ | ||
| Context: PaymentContext{ | ||
| Recipient: getRecipientAddress(), | ||
| Token: "USDC", | ||
| Amount: getPaymentAmount(), | ||
| Nonce: nonce, | ||
| ChainID: getChainID(), | ||
| }, | ||
| Signature: signature, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| body, _ := json.Marshal(verifyReq) | ||
| resp, err := http.Post("http://127.0.0.1:3002/verify", "application/json", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict: duplicate payment verification code that conflicts with the refactored verifyPayment() function used later. Lines 271-285 make a direct HTTP call without using context, missing error handling (line 285 has no return), and this code block is unreachable due to the return on line 268.
Delete this entire conflicted section - the correct implementation uses verifyPayment() on line 311.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 271:285
Comment:
Merge conflict: duplicate payment verification code that conflicts with the refactored `verifyPayment()` function used later. Lines 271-285 make a direct HTTP call without using context, missing error handling (line 285 has no `return`), and this code block is unreachable due to the `return` on line 268.
Delete this entire conflicted section - the correct implementation uses `verifyPayment()` on line 311.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| if err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing return statement after sending error response.
| if err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"}) | |
| resp, err := http.Post("http://127.0.0.1:3002/verify", "application/json", bytes.NewBuffer(body)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"}) | |
| return | |
| } |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 284:285
Comment:
Missing `return` statement after sending error response.
```suggestion
resp, err := http.Post("http://127.0.0.1:3002/verify", "application/json", bytes.NewBuffer(body))
if err != nil {
c.JSON(500, gin.H{"error": "verifier unavailable"})
return
}
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| _ = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&verifyResp) | ||
|
|
||
| if !verifyResp.IsValid { | ||
| c.Set("payment_verified", false) | ||
| c.JSON(403, gin.H{"error": "invalid signature"}) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c.Set("payment_verified", true) | ||
| c.Set("user_wallet", verifyResp.RecoveredAddress) | ||
|
|
||
| var req SummarizeRequest | ||
| if err := c.BindJSON(&req); err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": "invalid body"}) | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict: unreachable duplicate code inside verifyPayment() function. Lines 414-428 reference c.Set(), c.JSON(), and c.BindJSON() but c (gin.Context) is not available in this function - it takes context.Context, not gin.Context.
Delete this entire section - the correct return logic is on line 433.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 414:428
Comment:
Merge conflict: unreachable duplicate code inside `verifyPayment()` function. Lines 414-428 reference `c.Set()`, `c.JSON()`, and `c.BindJSON()` but `c` (gin.Context) is not available in this function - it takes `context.Context`, not `gin.Context`.
Delete this entire section - the correct return logic is on line 433.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| @@ -506,6 +574,7 @@ func callOpenRouter(ctx context.Context, text string) (string, error) { | |||
| if err := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&result); err != nil { | |||
| return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to decode AI response: %w", err) | |||
| } | |||
| return "stub summary", nil | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict: duplicate callOpenRouter() function definition. Lines 523-525 define a stub version that returns "stub summary", while lines 526-600 contain the full implementation. The stub will never execute and line 577 return "stub summary", nil is unreachable dead code.
Delete the stub function (lines 523-525) and the unreachable return (line 577).
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 523:577
Comment:
Merge conflict: duplicate `callOpenRouter()` function definition. Lines 523-525 define a stub version that returns `"stub summary"`, while lines 526-600 contain the full implementation. The stub will never execute and line 577 `return "stub summary", nil` is unreachable dead code.
Delete the stub function (lines 523-525) and the unreachable return (line 577).
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| module microai-paygate | |||
|
|
|||
| go 1.25.5 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Invalid Go version 1.25.5. The latest Go version is 1.23.x (as of early 2025). Valid format is go 1.23 or similar.
| go 1.25.5 | |
| go 1.23 |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: go.mod
Line: 3:3
Comment:
Invalid Go version `1.25.5`. The latest Go version is 1.23.x (as of early 2025). Valid format is `go 1.23` or similar.
```suggestion
go 1.23
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| module microai-paygate | ||
|
|
||
| go 1.25.5 | ||
|
|
||
| require ( | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-colorable v0.1.13 // indirect | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.19 // indirect | ||
| github.com/rs/zerolog v1.34.0 // indirect | ||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.12.0 // indirect | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This root-level go.mod shouldn't exist. The project structure shows this is a monorepo with separate modules (gateway/go.mod, verifier/Cargo.toml, web/package.json). The zerolog dependency should only be in gateway/go.mod, not at the root level.
Delete this file entirely - Go dependencies are already properly managed in gateway/go.mod.
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: go.mod
Line: 1:10
Comment:
This root-level `go.mod` shouldn't exist. The project structure shows this is a monorepo with separate modules (`gateway/go.mod`, `verifier/Cargo.toml`, `web/package.json`). The zerolog dependency should only be in `gateway/go.mod`, not at the root level.
Delete this file entirely - Go dependencies are already properly managed in `gateway/go.mod`.
<sub>Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!</sub>
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| github.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22 v22.5.0/go.mod h1:Y58oyj3AT4RCenI/lSvhwexgC+NSVTIJ3seZv2GcEnc= | ||
| github.com/godbus/dbus/v5 v5.0.4/go.mod h1:xhWf0FNVPg57R7Z0UbKHbJfkEywrmjJnf7w5xrFpKfA= | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-colorable v0.1.13 h1:fFA4WZxdEF4tXPZVKMLwD8oUnCTTo08duU7wxecdEvA= | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-colorable v0.1.13/go.mod h1:7S9/ev0klgBDR4GtXTXX8a3vIGJpMovkB8vQcUbaXHg= | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.16/go.mod h1:kYGgaQfpe5nmfYZH+SKPsOc2e4SrIfOl2e/yFXSvRLM= | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.19 h1:JITubQf0MOLdlGRuRq+jtsDlekdYPia9ZFsB8h/APPA= | ||
| github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.19/go.mod h1:W+V8PltTTMOvKvAeJH7IuucS94S2C6jfK/D7dTCTo3Y= | ||
| github.com/pkg/errors v0.9.1/go.mod h1:bwawxfHBFNV+L2hUp1rHADufV3IMtnDRdf1r5NINEl0= | ||
| github.com/rs/xid v1.6.0/go.mod h1:7XoLgs4eV+QndskICGsho+ADou8ySMSjJKDIan90Nz0= | ||
| github.com/rs/zerolog v1.34.0 h1:k43nTLIwcTVQAncfCw4KZ2VY6ukYoZaBPNOE8txlOeY= | ||
| github.com/rs/zerolog v1.34.0/go.mod h1:bJsvje4Z08ROH4Nhs5iH600c3IkWhwp44iRc54W6wYQ= | ||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20220811171246-fbc7d0a398ab/go.mod h1:oPkhp1MJrh7nUepCBck5+mAzfO9JrbApNNgaTdGDITg= | ||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.6.0/go.mod h1:oPkhp1MJrh7nUepCBck5+mAzfO9JrbApNNgaTdGDITg= | ||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.12.0 h1:CM0HF96J0hcLAwsHPJZjfdNzs0gftsLfgKt57wWHJ0o= | ||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.12.0/go.mod h1:oPkhp1MJrh7nUepCBck5+mAzfO9JrbApNNgaTdGDITg= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This root-level go.sum shouldn't exist for the same reason as go.mod - this is a monorepo with module-specific dependency management.
Delete this file entirely.
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: go.sum
Line: 1:15
Comment:
This root-level `go.sum` shouldn't exist for the same reason as `go.mod` - this is a monorepo with module-specific dependency management.
Delete this file entirely.
<sub>Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!</sub>
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| func handleHealth(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ | ||
| "status": "ok", | ||
| "service": "gateway", | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
handleHealth() function is defined but never used. The actual health check endpoint uses handleHealthz() on line 186.
Either remove this function or rename it to handleHealthz() and remove the duplicate definition on line 980.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 232:237
Comment:
`handleHealth()` function is defined but never used. The actual health check endpoint uses `handleHealthz()` on line 186.
Either remove this function or rename it to `handleHealthz()` and remove the duplicate definition on line 980.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Additional Comments (1)
Prompt To Fix With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: gateway/main.go
Line: 62:78
Comment:
Merge conflict: duplicate function definitions. Lines 62-78 (`func main()` and `func validateConfig()`) are duplicated again at lines 79-96.
```suggestion
func validateConfig() error {
required := []string{
"OPENROUTER_API_KEY",
}
var missing []string
for _, key := range required {
if os.Getenv(key) == "" {
missing = append(missing, key)
}
}
if len(missing) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("missing required environment variables: %v", missing)
}
return nil
}
func main() {
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise. |
|
@magic-peach so many bugs please fix the codebase and follow the docs |
2 participants
##PR Description
Summary
This PR adds a structured JSON logging middleware to the Gateway to improve observability, debugging, and production monitoring.
Changes
fixes #17
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.
Greptile Overview
Greptile Summary
This PR attempts to add structured JSON logging middleware using zerolog but contains critical merge conflicts that prevent compilation.
Key Changes:
gateway/middleware/logger.goimplementing structured JSON logging with configurable log levelspayment_verified,user_wallet)gin.New()+ custom middleware setupgateway/go.modCritical Issues Found:
gateway/main.gohas multiple unresolved merge conflicts with duplicate function definitions, unreachable code blocks, and syntax errors across lines 62-78, 126-131, 253-285, 414-428, 464-471, and 523-577main()andvalidateConfig()functions, conflictinggin.New()/gin.Default()initialization, and invalid variable referencesgo.modandgo.sumfiles incorrectly added (invalid Go version 1.25.5, wrong location for monorepo)returnstatement after error response on line 285handleHealth()function shadowshandleHealthz()The middleware implementation itself is clean, but the integration is completely broken and must be redone.
Confidence Score: 0/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram participant Client participant Gateway participant Logger as RequestLogger Middleware participant Handler as handleSummarize participant Verifier participant OpenRouter as AI Service Client->>Gateway: POST /api/ai/summarize Gateway->>Logger: Start request timing Logger->>Handler: c.Next() - pass to handler Handler->>Handler: Check X-402-Signature & X-402-Nonce headers alt Missing payment headers Handler->>Handler: c.Set("payment_verified", false) Handler-->>Client: 402 Payment Required else Headers present Handler->>Verifier: POST /verify (payment context + signature) Verifier-->>Handler: VerifyResponse (is_valid, recovered_address) alt Invalid signature Handler->>Handler: c.Set("payment_verified", false) Handler-->>Client: 403 Invalid Signature else Valid signature Handler->>Handler: c.Set("payment_verified", true) Handler->>Handler: c.Set("user_wallet", recovered_address) Handler->>OpenRouter: POST /chat/completions (summarize text) OpenRouter-->>Handler: AI summary response Handler->>Handler: Generate receipt & store Handler-->>Client: 200 OK (summary + X-402-Receipt header) end end Handler->>Logger: Request complete Logger->>Logger: Calculate latency, read payment_verified & user_wallet from context Logger->>Logger: log.Info() - structured JSON log with method, path, status, latency, payment_verified, user_wallet Logger-->>Gateway: Complete middleware chain