This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2025. It is now read-only.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
if there is a pugdoc output file, we could use that to speed things up:
1. Full pugdoc document
Cache whole document and check if it's completely the same. In order to do this we would need to make the examples array an object to be able to do an equal check. Alternatively we could make a cache property with the complete yaml comment. This would result in larger output files (not sure if this is an issue), but could make for faster checks.
2. Compiled example
if the example is the same as cache and before, afterEach and beforeEach are the same, don't compile pug. In order to do this there would need to be more strict checking of example names.
3. Compiled fragment examples
if the fragments are the same as cache and before, afterEach and beforeEach are the same, don't compile fragment pug. In order to do this there would need to be more strict checking of subexample names.