Skip to content

Conversation

@Eric-B-Wu
Copy link
Contributor

Commit Type

  • feature - New functionality
  • fix - Bug fix
  • refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
  • perf - Performance improvement
  • docs - Documentation update
  • test - Test-related changes
  • chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

  • Low - Minor changes, limited scope
  • Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
  • High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Fixes an issue where we aren't calling our iframe with the obo token, so chats will fail if required

Also fixes issues in standalone where we weren't fetching the obo token properly
Cherry pick of #8604

Impact of Change

  • Users: Users should now be able to use agent chats that require obo tokens
  • Developers: standalone changes to properly fetch the obo token
  • System: no system changes

Test Plan

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • E2E tests added/updated
  • Manual testing completed
  • Tested in:

Contributors

@Eric-B-Wu

Screenshots/Videos

@Eric-B-Wu Eric-B-Wu added the Risk:Low Low risk change with minimal impact label Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

PR Title

  • Current: fix(designerv2): Not passing obo token to the chat iframe
  • Issue: The title is concise and descriptive, specifying the affected module (designerv2) and the nature of the fix (obo token handling).
  • Recommendation: No changes needed. Good title format for traceability.

Commit Type

  • Properly selected (fix)
  • Only one selected, which is correct

Risk Level

  • Low risk clearly selected and matches the label (Risk:Low)

What & Why

  • Current:

    Fixes an issue where we aren't calling our iframe with the obo token, so chats will fail if required

    Also fixes issues in standalone where we weren't fetching the obo token properly
    Cherry pick of fix(designerv2): Not passing obo token to the chat iframe #8604

  • Issue: Clear, direct, and gives technical context and reason for the change.
  • Recommendation: No changes needed.

Impact of Change

  • Clear impacts described:
    • Users: Users should now be able to use agent chats that require obo tokens
    • Developers: Standalone changes to properly fetch the obo token
    • System: No system changes
  • Recommendation: No changes needed.

Test Plan

  • Manual testing completed is selected and appropriate for this bug fix.

⚠️ Contributors

  • Only the PR author is mentioned. If other PMs, designers or team members contributed, consider tagging them for credit. Not required, so passes.

Screenshots/Videos

  • Section left blank, which is acceptable for a backend/token fix.

Summary Table

Section Status Recommendation
Title
Commit Type
Risk Level
What & Why
Impact of Change
Test Plan
Contributors ⚠️ Tag others if applicable for credit
Screenshots/Videos

All required sections are correct and complete. Please consider tagging any contributors if relevant. Thank you for maintaining high PR hygiene!


Last updated: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 21:07:39 GMT

@github-actions
Copy link

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

PR Title

  • Current: fix(designerv2): Not passing obo token to the chat iframe
  • Issue: Title is concise, specific, and follows the conventional commit format.
  • Recommendation: No changes needed.

Commit Type

  • Properly selected (fix)
  • Only one selected, which is correct.

Risk Level

  • Correctly marked as Low risk both in the template and label. Matches the described scope and code diff size.

What & Why

  • Current:
    Fixes an issue where we aren't calling our iframe with the obo token, so chats will fail if required

    Also fixes issues in standalone where we weren't fetching the obo token properly
    Cherry pick of fix(designerv2): Not passing obo token to the chat iframe #8604

  • Issue: Clear explanation provided.

  • Recommendation: No improvement needed; context is sufficient.


Impact of Change

  • Impact described for Users, Developers, and System. Users and developer impact are clear; system impact confirmed as no effect.
  • Recommendation: No changes needed, all sections addressed.

Test Plan

  • Manual testing completed marked appropriately, given the change scope. No additional requirements.

⚠️ Contributors

  • Only the author listed (@Eric-B-Wu). It's always good to give additional credit to PMs, designers, or collaborators. Consider tagging collaborators if applicable.

Screenshots/Videos

  • No visual/UI changes evident from the description or title, so absence here is appropriate.

Summary Table

Section Status Recommendation
Title
Commit Type
Risk Level
What & Why
Impact of Change
Test Plan
Contributors ⚠️ Consider tagging teammates, PMs, designers
Screenshots/Videos

PR body and title are both well-structured and compliant. Please consider crediting all contributors for transparency and team recognition. Otherwise, no changes needed—thank you for a high-quality submission!


Last updated: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 21:07:39 GMT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-validated Risk:Low Low risk change with minimal impact

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants