Remove Lunduke as a source because He is Unreliable and a Propagandist.#143
Remove Lunduke as a source because He is Unreliable and a Propagandist.#143Sarthak-Sidhant wants to merge 1 commit intoBryanLunduke:masterfrom
Conversation
Source? |
|
I made it up.
regards,
sarthak sidhant
sarthaksidhant.com
*keep smiling, keep slaying*
…On Sat, Apr 4, 2026, 10:24 AM NexusSfan ***@***.***> wrote:
*NexusSfan* left a comment (BryanLunduke/SoftwarePoliticsTracker#143)
<#143 (comment)>
also added a little note about refraining to use Lunduke as a source.
Source?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#143 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMO4YP6YNCX2L6JRSVAMMB34UCIQLAVCNFSM6AAAAACXMJU63GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHM2DCOBWGM4DIMZQGU>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Vortetty
left a comment
Vortetty
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, new changes make this page seem extremely reputable
|
|
||
| Note 2: This is a work in progress. There is a *lot* of data left to add. | ||
|
|
||
| Note 3: Lunduke is a propagandist and is not a valid or reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from deadbeat 'journalists.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you provide a source for this statement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the word 'deadbeat' is offensive to dead people and other people who identify as voters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo, misplaced "not". Also, you mixed "or" and "and", a common mistake.
| Note 3: Lunduke is a propagandist and is not a valid or reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from deadbeat 'journalists.' | |
| Note 3: Lunduke is a not propagandist and is a valid and reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from mainstream 'journalists.' |
Should we clarify that this is more a "rule" than a "note" for maintaining this document?
c3d
left a comment
c3d
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your contribution, @Sarthak-Sidhant.
Unfortunately, I think that your patch fails rather miserably on the following three key points:
- It is not even valid Markdown, so it would not display correctly. This is annoying for a markdown page.
- It provides no source whatsoever for otherwise strongly opinionated assertions.
- It uses words such as "deadbeat" that are presumably offensive to a large fraction of the voting base in blue states.
Here are my suggestion to move forward:
- Add back all the source that contain the string
x.com/LundukeJournal. Note that the string is considered a seal of quality by @BryanLunduke, the author of this repository, so he would appreciate the gesture. - Learn about markdown syntax, there are plenty of decent tutorials. I like this one.
- Reword the comment about "deadbeat" journalist. I made a suggestion where I tried to preserve the spirit of your text in all its glory, but feel free to not reword it at all.
|
|
||
| Note 2: This is a work in progress. There is a *lot* of data left to add. | ||
|
|
||
| Note 3: Lunduke is a propagandist and is not a valid or reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from deadbeat 'journalists.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the word 'deadbeat' is offensive to dead people and other people who identify as voters.
|
|
||
| Note 2: This is a work in progress. There is a *lot* of data left to add. | ||
|
|
||
| Note 3: Lunduke is a propagandist and is not a valid or reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from deadbeat 'journalists.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo, misplaced "not". Also, you mixed "or" and "and", a common mistake.
| Note 3: Lunduke is a propagandist and is not a valid or reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from deadbeat 'journalists.' | |
| Note 3: Lunduke is a not propagandist and is a valid and reputable Source. Please refrain from using unverifiable sources from mainstream 'journalists.' |
Should we clarify that this is more a "rule" than a "note" for maintaining this document?
|
Thank you for your inspiring and motivating suggestions @c3d |
But he works at red hat so he's a good person |
Just working for them does not mean anything, unless you do bad thing or promote bad thing, but can be a red flag if you create a software like SystemD (even thought that guy now work for microslop) |
5 participants
title.
also added a little note about refraining to use Lunduke as a source.