Replace std::unordered_map and std::map with Parallel Hashmap#537
Replace std::unordered_map and std::map with Parallel Hashmap#537joseph-kaile wants to merge 14 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
According to this link (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415), G++ version 9 is unable to compile std::any in a tuple but is able to compile std::experimental::any. |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
12 similar comments
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
1 similar comment
|
Thanks again for your contribution @joseph-kaile! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
Trying to fix #375.
Conclusion: Testing with upsampleGltfForRasterOverlays, there is an improvement (like 10%). In upsampling OSM buildings, when the file sizes can get up to 3 megabytes, the discrepancy is higher, maybe around 25% faster.
However, in this test,
the phmap is over 10x faster, 2,712,062 microseconds vs 32,561,647 microseconds