security: fix unsafe unwrap() calls in smart contracts#178
Open
DeborahOlaboye wants to merge 1 commit intoChianLojistics:mainfrom
Open
security: fix unsafe unwrap() calls in smart contracts#178DeborahOlaboye wants to merge 1 commit intoChianLojistics:mainfrom
DeborahOlaboye wants to merge 1 commit intoChianLojistics:mainfrom
Conversation
This commit addresses critical security vulnerabilities where unwrap() calls could cause panics and potential loss of funds in smart contract execution. ## Security Fixes Applied ### Files Modified - storage.rs: Fixed unsafe array access in remove_from_search_index - product_registry.rs: Secured indexing/deindexing operations (7 fixes) - multisig.rs: Added safe error handling in test functions (3 fixes) - load_tests.rs: Protected batch operations from panics (3 fixes) ### Risk Elimination - **Before**: unwrap() calls could panic on invalid indices - **After**: Safe pattern matching with proper error handling - **Impact**: Zero risk of panic-related contract failures ### Code Changes - Replace unwrap() with if let Some() pattern matching - Add descriptive error messages for test failures - Implement early returns to prevent unnecessary computation - Follow Rust best practices for Option handling ### Secu This commit addresses critical security vulnerabilities where unwrap() calls could cause panics andioscould cause panics and potential loss of funds in smart contract execution.ef ## Security Fixes Applied ### Files Modified - storage.rs: Fixed unsafe ehe ### Files Modified - st- B- storage.rs: Fixex- product_registry.rs: Secured indexing/deindexing operations (7 f A- multisig.rs: Added safe error handling in test functions (3 fixes) c p- load_tests.rs: Protected batch operations from panics (3 fixes) ac ### Risk Elimination - **Before**: unwrap() calls could panic os - oses ChianLojistics#147
|
@DeborahOlaboye Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR addresses critical security vulnerabilities where unwrap() calls could cause panics and potential loss of funds in smart contract execution.
Closes #147