Draft
Conversation
welldan97
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2025
Collaborator
welldan97
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking great, we support multistep signing now
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TL;DR
The
signmethod does a few other things (like wallet creation etc) prior calling thesigner. If SDK user wants to skip the signer, he/she would have to replicate some of the logic which ain't great.This PR splits the
signmethod into:prepareSigningData- prepare the final transactionprepareSignerTx- turns signed TxCell into a SignedTx structureExample without signer abstraction:
Test Plan
https://testnet.tonviewer.com/transaction/58a1db257f9309c587063f9439cbfef8738b6b52fcc2dafa2592e220d7f30996