Conversation
feat(pnpm): replace npm and add npmrc
… enhance Rust Clippy configuration
…dency, and refactor various components for improved code consistency
…s in release workflow
…dard releases for Windows and macOS
…nd generating updater files
…ction for improved readability and maintainability
…able function for login and registration
Feature lint format, all vue, ts
…ction for improved readability and maintainability
…able function for login and registration
Feature uno and bugfix
文件级别变更
提示和命令与 Sourcery 互动
自定义您的体验访问您的 仪表盘 以：
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request migrates the frontend package manager to pnpm, integrates Unocss, enhances the email verification process, adds linting tools, and refactors the dashboard view. The migration to pnpm improves efficiency, while Unocss optimizes styling and development speed. The enhanced email verification process improves security and reliability. The addition of linting tools ensures code quality and consistency. Finally, the refactoring of the dashboard view improves code readability and maintainability. Updated class diagram for LoginOverlayclassDiagram
class LoginOverlay {
- emit: any
- message: any
- currentLang: any
- activeTab: any
- userStore: any
- showForgotPassword: boolean
- forgotPasswordLoading: boolean
- forgotPasswordCodeSending: boolean
- forgotPasswordForm: object
- formState: object
+ handleLogin(): Promise<void>
+ handleSendCode(email: string, type: string): Promise<void>
+ handleRegister(): Promise<void>
+ handleForgotPassword(): Promise<void>
}
class FormState {
- login: object
- register: object
}
class Validators {
+ validatePassword(value: string): boolean
+ validateEmail(value: string): boolean
+ validateCode(value: string): boolean
}
LoginOverlay -- FormState : has
LoginOverlay -- Validators : uses
note for LoginOverlay "Refactored to improve readability and maintainability."
note for LoginOverlay "Added methods to handle forgot password."
note for FormState "Represents the state of the login and register forms."
note for Validators "Represents the validators for the login and register forms."
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Cloxl - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The description mentions features that are not yet implemented; consider removing these until they are complete to avoid confusion.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| presets: [ | ||
| presetUno() as any, | ||
| presetAttributify() as any, | ||
| presetIcons({ | ||
| scale: 1.2, | ||
| warn: true, | ||
| }) as any, | ||
| ], | ||
| transformers: [transformerDirectives() as any], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Consider refining type casts in plugin presets.
The use of 'as any' when casting the UnoCSS presets may hide potential type issues. If possible, try to use more specific types provided by the plugin or adjust configuration types to increase type safety.
| presets: [ | |
| presetUno() as any, | |
| presetAttributify() as any, | |
| presetIcons({ | |
| scale: 1.2, | |
| warn: true, | |
| }) as any, | |
| ], | |
| transformers: [transformerDirectives() as any], | |
| presets: [ | |
| presetUno(), | |
| presetAttributify(), | |
| presetIcons({ | |
| scale: 1.2, | |
| warn: true, | |
| }), | |
| ], | |
| transformers: [transformerDirectives()], |
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| **联系方式** | ||
| 侵权投诉或技术支持请联络：[cloxl996@outlook.com](mailto:cloxl996@outlook.com) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question (typo): Possible typo in email address.
The email address is listed as "cloxl996@outlook.com". Is it possible this is a typo and should be "cloxd996@outlook.com"?
| 侵权投诉或技术支持请联络：[cloxl996@outlook.com](mailto:cloxl996@outlook.com) | |
| 侵权投诉或技术支持请联络：[cloxd996@outlook.com](mailto:cloxd996@outlook.com) |
| const response = await invoke<ApiResponse<any>>('check_user', { email }) | ||
| return response |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const response = await invoke<ApiResponse<any>>('check_user', { email }) | |
| return response | |
| return await invoke<ApiResponse<any>>('check_user', { email }); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
| if (!valueStr) return false; | ||
| const valueStr = await getUserData('system.articles') | ||
| if (!valueStr) return false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)
| if (!valueStr) return false | |
| if (!valueStr) { |
Explanation
It is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).
| const result = readIds.includes(articleId) | ||
| return result |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const result = readIds.includes(articleId) | |
| return result | |
| return readIds.includes(articleId); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
| async function init() { | ||
| if (initialized.value) return; | ||
| if (initialized.value) return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)
| if (initialized.value) return | |
| if (initialized.value) { |
Explanation
It is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).
| function setupHistoryListener() { | ||
| const handler = async () => { | ||
| await loadHistoryRecords() | ||
| }; | ||
| window.addEventListener('history_updated', handler); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener('history_updated', handler) | ||
|
|
||
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener('history_updated', handler); | ||
| window.removeEventListener('history_updated', handler) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Avoid function declarations, favouring function assignment expressions, inside blocks. (avoid-function-declarations-in-blocks)
Explanation
Function declarations may be hoisted in Javascript, but the behaviour is inconsistent between browsers. Hoisting is generally confusing and should be avoided. Rather than using function declarations inside blocks, you should use function expressions, which create functions in-scope.| }) | ||
| // 计算属性 | ||
| const currentInbound = computed(() => { | ||
| if (inboundList.value.length === 0) return null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)
| if (inboundList.value.length === 0) return null | |
| if (inboundList.value.length === 0) { |
Explanation
It is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).
| async function fetchInboundList() { | ||
| isLoading.value = true | ||
| try { | ||
| const configData = await getUserData('system.inbound.config') | ||
| if (configData) { | ||
| const config = JSON.parse(configData) as InboundConfig | ||
| inboundList.value = config.inbound | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.warn('未获取到线路配置') | ||
| inboundList.value = [] | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // 获取当前选择的线路索引 | ||
| const currentIndex = await getUserData('system.inbound.current') | ||
| if (currentIndex) { | ||
| const index = parseInt(currentIndex) | ||
| if (!isNaN(index) && index >= 0 && index < inboundList.value.length) { | ||
| currentInboundIndex.value = index | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('获取线路配置失败:', error) | ||
| inboundList.value = [] | ||
| } finally { | ||
| isLoading.value = false | ||
| // 获取当前选择的线路索引 | ||
| const currentIndex = await getUserData('system.inbound.current') | ||
| if (currentIndex) { | ||
| const index = parseInt(currentIndex) | ||
| if (!isNaN(index) && index >= 0 && index < inboundList.value.length) { | ||
| currentInboundIndex.value = index | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('获取线路配置失败:', error) | ||
| inboundList.value = [] | ||
| } finally { | ||
| isLoading.value = false | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Avoid function declarations, favouring function assignment expressions, inside blocks. (avoid-function-declarations-in-blocks)
Explanation
Function declarations may be hoisted in Javascript, but the behaviour is inconsistent between browsers. Hoisting is generally confusing and should be avoided. Rather than using function declarations inside blocks, you should use function expressions, which create functions in-scope.
src/stores/inbound.ts
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Avoid function declarations, favouring function assignment expressions, inside blocks. (avoid-function-declarations-in-blocks)
Explanation
Function declarations may be hoisted in Javascript, but the behaviour is inconsistent between browsers. Hoisting is generally confusing and should be avoided. Rather than using function declarations inside blocks, you should use function expressions, which create functions in-scope.
|
大老您好，想問 Cursor Tab 被鎖有解嗎? 激活狀態下還是能和LLM進行chat，但是auto complete 用到一半被鎖了。顯示Requires pro |
这个只能换号解决了 cursor的问题 |
|
每次登录要输入账号密码太麻烦了，做一个记录账号的功能 |
软件所有数据完成存储到本地 记录账户密码功能并不安全 |
…ion checking logic
Feat setting UI
5 participants
This pull request includes the following updates and enhancements:
此次拉取请求包括以下更新和增强功能：
好的，这是翻译成中文的 pull request 总结：
Sourcery 总结
迁移前端包管理器至 pnpm，添加代码检查工具和 Unocss，增强邮件验证，并更新依赖。
构建：
Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
Migrate the frontend package manager to pnpm, add linting tools and Unocss, enhance email verification, and update dependencies.
Build: