SANC-32-Implement-passenger-management-system #22
Conversation
…lent bugs - Direction address validation -> Mostly completed. An error with properly validating an address must be fixed - Link integration -> Must be rewritten as it was coded improperly
- Possible use case: frontend calls a DB update function from backend. Backend verifies form inputs and calls this new function to validate destination address
- Not fully tested yet
- \src\app\_components\agencycomponents\agency-interactive-area.tsx contains temporary comments on how to call an endpoint that verifies the destination location in the backend - \src\app\page.tsx contains temporary comments that may be used to replace link integration at a future date
wesleylui
requested review from
JustinTan-1,
Yemyam,
burtonjong,
promatty,
tanvimahal and
themaxboucher
as code owners
Made the following changes to address PR feedback: - Made a separate private API key for Google Maps - Added error handling when making a fetch call to Google Maps' API and when receiving a response from it - Removed NPM usage and added yarn usage - Made the backend validation endpoint for destination address return null instead of false if validation failed - Updated development API keys (in Google cloud) to ensure that features work with heavily restricted keys Fixed an edge case arising from filled user input in the mantine form causing Google Maps' autocorrect API to break - Done by clearing the destination address form input upon closing it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think i'm missing something ehre. What was the point of this ticket... is it to assocaite a passenger to a bookign? if so why do we need the booking passengers talbe..?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here's what I was thinking...I added the booking_passengers table as a join table for many-to-many relationships
For ex: a booking can have multiple passengers, and a passenger can be on multiple bookings. This was to avoid duplicating passenger contact information if a passenger were to be ride multiple times.
Questions:
- should a booking have multiple passengers?
- passengers are not users of the app? are they independent passenger records created as part of a booking?
What do you suggest?
…ink-integration # Conflicts: # .env.example # package.json # src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx # src/app/page.tsx # yarn.lock
- Changed the way the Google Maps API was loaded to follow an automatic approach rather than manually loading it - Utilized env.js to properly handle API keys
…ink-integration SANC-39: Google maps link integration
…onarmy into SANC-32-Implement-passenger-management-system
WalkthroughThis PR removes organization and invitation management features, simplifies authentication to email/password only, eliminates email-sending capabilities, and refactors UI components. Database schemas are consolidated, calendar UI is replaced with placeholders, and dependencies related to Resend, React Email, and organization features are removed. Node.js version is downgraded and build tooling versions are updated. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App as App (page/layout)
participant Auth as Authentication<br/>(auth.ts)
participant DB as Database
participant API as API/tRPC
Note over User,API: OLD FLOW (Removed)
User->>App: Access admin page
App->>Auth: Authenticate via organization plugin
Auth->>DB: Check organization membership
DB-->>Auth: Organization data
Auth->>API: Load organization router
API->>DB: Fetch organization data
Note over User,API: NEW FLOW (Simplified)
User->>App: Access admin page
App->>Auth: requireRole(["admin"]) guard
Auth->>DB: Fetch user role (direct)
DB-->>Auth: Role only
Auth-->>App: Session validated
App->>API: Call tRPC (no org router)
API->>DB: Query with simplified schema
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes
Areas requiring extra attention:
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
src/app/_components/testnotificationbutton.tsx (1)
9-16: Critical: Button children usage incompatible with new Button API.The Button component (src/app/_components/Button.tsx) no longer accepts
childrenas a prop—only the requiredtextprop. All four Button instances here pass text as children, which will fail.Apply this diff to fix:
- <Button onClick={() => notify.success("this is a success message")}> - Success notification - </Button> - <Button onClick={() => notify.warning("this is a warning message")}> - Warning notification - </Button> - <Button onClick={() => notify.error("this is an error message")}>Error notification</Button> - <Button onClick={() => notify.info("this is an info message")}>Info notification</Button> + <Button text="Success notification" onClick={() => notify.success("this is a success message")} /> + <Button text="Warning notification" onClick={() => notify.warning("this is a warning message")} /> + <Button text="Error notification" onClick={() => notify.error("this is an error message")} /> + <Button text="Info notification" onClick={() => notify.info("this is an info message")} />src/app/_components/Button.tsx (1)
38-49: Removedtype,children, andloadingprops are breaking changes.The removal of:
typeprop (line 52 now hardcoded to"button") prevents using this Button in forms that needtype="submit"childrenprop (line 70 now only renders{text}) breaks components passing JSX childrenloadingprop removes the ability to show loading statesThere's also a duplicate Button component at
src/app/_components/common/button/Button.tsxwith the fuller API (includingtype,children,loading). This creates API inconsistency.Consider:
- Keeping the fuller API to maintain backward compatibility
- Documenting this as a breaking change and updating all usages
- Removing the duplicate component to avoid confusion
src/server/db/booking-schema.ts (1)
1-42: Fix column naming convention inconsistency in the schema definition.The migration and schema correctly implement the passenger integration. However,
src/server/db/booking-schema.tsline 11 violates the established naming convention:passengerInfo: text("passengerInfo")should use snake_case for the database column name like all other fields (e.g.,dropoffLocation: text("dropoff_location")). Change to:passengerInfo: text("passenger_info").notNull(). Update the migration accordingly if not yet deployed.The concerns about removed
start_time/end_timefields were unfounded—no such fields exist. The passenger-schema integration is properly implemented with thebooking_passengersjunction table.src/lib/auth-helpers.ts (1)
24-31: Comment and redirect target are inconsistentThe comment says this should redirect to an “unauthorized” destination, but the code redirects to
"/"in both the unauthenticated and unauthorized cases. Clarify the intended behavior and either adjust the redirect target or update the comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
src/app/_components/mantinetest.tsx (1)
1-12: Significant mismatch between PR objectives and actual changes.The PR objectives describe implementing passenger management schema with database tables (Passengers table, Booking-Passenger join table, etc.), but this file contains only a UI test component with an added React import. This suggests either:
- Wrong files were included in this PR
- The PR description is incorrect
- Database migration files are missing from the review
Please verify that all intended changes are included in this PR.
Note: Explicit React import may be unnecessary.
With React 19 and the modern JSX transform, the explicit
import React from "react";is typically not required unless you're directly referencing the React object or specific TypeScript configurations require it.src/trpc/react.tsx (1)
13-13: Inconsistency: Change unrelated to PR objectives.This explicit initialization to
undefinedis cosmetic—variables declared without an initializer are alreadyundefinedin JavaScript. The PR objectives describe implementing a passenger management schema, but this file contains only a style change to TRPC client setup.If this is a linting requirement or team style preference, consider documenting it. Otherwise, this change could be reverted as it adds no value.
src/trpc/query-client.ts (1)
1-1: Inconsistency: Import reordering unrelated to PR objectives.This import reordering has no functional impact. The PR objectives describe implementing a passenger management schema with database changes, but this file contains only a cosmetic import reorder in TRPC client setup.
This change may be from an auto-formatting tool. If unintentional, it can be reverted; if it reflects a team convention, consider applying it consistently across the codebase.
README.md (1)
129-174: Consider documenting the new passenger schema in the workflow section.The PR adds a passenger management schema with a
Booking-Passengerjoin table, but this is not mentioned in the database workflow documentation. Consider adding a brief note explaining that a new passenger schema has been added and what it includes, so developers understand what database changes are present after running migrations.For example, after the workflow section (around line 129), add a note like:
### Recent Schema Changes This PR adds a new passenger management system that includes: - **Passengers table**: Stores passenger information (name, email, phone, notes, emergency contact details) - **Booking-Passenger join table**: Associates passengers with bookings When pulling the latest code, ensure you run the migration commands above to apply these schema changes to your database.This helps developers understand the scope of schema changes without requiring them to dig into migration files.
src/app/_components/fullcalendartest.tsx (1)
6-6: Remove the redundant React import at line 6.With React 19.0.0 and Next.js 15.2.3, the automatic JSX transform is enabled by default. Since this component uses only JSX syntax and never directly references React APIs, the explicit import is unnecessary.
-import React from "react";src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx (1)
10-10: Remove unnecessary React import.With React 19 and the modern JSX transform enabled, explicit React imports are no longer required unless you're using specific React APIs directly.
-import React, { useState } from "react"; +import { useState } from "react";src/app/_components/aggridtest.tsx (1)
19-33: Consider removing unused state setters or clarifying intent.The state setters
setRowDataandsetColDefs(previously prefixed with_) are defined but never used in the component. If these setters won't be used for dynamic updates, consider usingconstvariables instead ofuseStateto simplify the code:- const [rowData, setRowData] = useState<IRow[]>([ + const rowData: IRow[] = [ { make: "Tesla", model: "Model Y", price: 64950, electric: true }, { make: "Ford", model: "F-Series", price: 33850, electric: false }, { make: "Toyota", model: "Corolla", price: 29600, electric: false }, { make: "Mercedes", model: "EQA", price: 48890, electric: true }, { make: "Fiat", model: "500", price: 15774, electric: false }, { make: "Nissan", model: "Juke", price: 20675, electric: false }, - ]); + ]; - const [colDefs, setColDefs] = useState<ColDef<IRow>[]>([ + const colDefs: ColDef<IRow>[] = [ { field: "make" }, { field: "model" }, { field: "price" }, { field: "electric" }, - ]); + ];If the setters are intended for future use, consider adding a comment explaining the planned functionality.
drizzle/0000_long_ikaris.sql (2)
9-23: Consider adding a composite unique constraint for accountsRight now, nothing prevents multiple
accountrows with the sameprovider_id/account_idpair for a given user. That can cause subtle auth bugs (duplicate provider links, ambiguous lookups). Consider adding a composite unique constraint such as:ALTER TABLE "account" ADD CONSTRAINT "account_provider_account_unique" UNIQUE ("provider_id", "account_id");This keeps the auth model consistent and simplifies querying by provider identity.
58-80: Bookings schema is fine, but watch redundancy and indexing with the new passenger model
passengerInfoastext NOT NULLworks for free‑form notes, but with a dedicatedpassengers+booking_passengersjoin schema coming in a later migration, you’ll end up with both structured passenger records and this unstructured blob.Two suggestions:
Clarify role of
passengerInfo
Decide whether this is:
- purely supplemental notes (keep it), or
- a legacy catch‑all for passenger details you’ll eventually deprecate.
If it’s legacy, consider making it nullable or documenting that structured passenger data is the source of truth to avoid divergence.
Add indexes for FK columns when usage grows
agency_id,driver_id,created_by, andupdated_byare all join points back touser. As query volume grows, adding indexes on these columns will be important for performance (e.g., historical bookings per agency/driver).These can be deferred until query patterns are clearer but are worth tracking.
src/server/db/auth-schema.ts (2)
17-20: Keep role literals in sync with the rest of the auth logic
roleis now constrained viatext("role", { enum: ["admin", "driver", "agency"] })with default"driver", which matches the intended admin/agency distinction.To avoid drift, ensure these literals stay aligned with:
ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLESinsrc/types/types.tsand- any
Roletype unions or client‑side role checks.If there are multiple definitions of allowed roles, consider centralizing them (e.g., deriving the union type from a single const array) so changing roles in one place doesn’t silently desync DB, types, and auth checks.
68-71: Verify booking relation names match those defined in booking-schema
userRelationsuses:driverBookings: many(bookings, { relationName: "driverBookings" }), agencyBookings: many(bookings, { relationName: "agencyBookings" }),This looks correct, but it depends on
booking-schema.tsdefining matchingrelations(bookings, …)blocks that use the samerelationNamestrings. A mismatch there will cause Drizzle relation helpers to behave unexpectedly or fail at runtime.Double‑check that
booking-schema.tsuses"driverBookings"and"agencyBookings"for the inverse relations.src/server/api/trpc.ts (1)
10-11: Admin procedure role check is correct; comment is staleThe updated
adminProcedure:const userRole = ctx.session?.user.role; if (!ctx.session?.user || !userRole || !ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES.includes(userRole)) { throw new TRPCError({ code: "UNAUTHORIZED" }); }correctly restricts access to authenticated users whose
roleis one ofADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES(e.g.,"admin"or"agency"). This is a clear improvement over hard‑coding a single role.Minor nit: the inline comment
// Check if the user is driveris now misleading, since the check is for any role inADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES. Consider updating or removing that comment to avoid confusion.Also applies to: 135-146
src/server/db/passenger-schema.ts (1)
38-40: Consider renamingbookingsrelation for clarity
passengersRelationsexposesbookings: many(bookingPassengers), but that relation actually returnsbookingPassengersrows (with nestedbookingif requested), not barebookings. A name likebookingPassengersmay better reflect what’s loaded and reduce confusion when usingdb.query.passengers.findMany({ with: { ... } }).src/types/types.ts (1)
1-24: Tighten role typing and ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES for better type safetyRight now
ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLESis inferred asstring[], so typos or mismatches withRolewouldn’t be caught at compile time. You can deriveRolefromROLE_PERMISSIONSand strongly type the admin list:-export type Role = "admin" | "driver" | "agency"; - -export const ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES = ["admin", "agency"]; - -export const ROLE_PERMISSIONS = { +export const ROLE_PERMISSIONS = { admin: { @@ }, agency: { @@ }, } as const; + +export type Role = keyof typeof ROLE_PERMISSIONS; + +export const ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES: Role[] = ["admin", "agency"];This keeps all role names in one place and ensures any future changes to roles/permissions stay in sync.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (78)
.env.example(1 hunks).github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks).github/workflows/lintandbuild.yml(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)README.md(3 hunks)biome.jsonc(1 hunks)drizzle.config.ts(1 hunks)drizzle/0000_long_ikaris.sql(1 hunks)drizzle/0001_left_firebrand.sql(0 hunks)drizzle/0001_tough_drax.sql(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/app/_components/Button.module.scss(1 hunks)src/app/_components/Button.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/_components/admincomponents/admin-dashboard.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/_components/admincomponents/invite-user-form.module.scss(0 hunks)src/app/_components/admincomponents/invite-user-form.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/_components/admincomponents/test/adminbutton.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-form.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.module.scss(1 hunks)src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/_components/agencycomponents/view-controller.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/_components/aggridtest.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/_components/calendar-view.module.scss(0 hunks)src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/_components/common/emails/emails.module.scss(0 hunks)src/app/_components/common/emails/register-account.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/_components/common/modal/modaltests.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/_components/fullcalendartest.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/_components/mantinetest.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/_components/navbar.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/_components/testnotificationbutton.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/admin/admin-layout.module.scss(0 hunks)src/app/admin/driver-logs/page.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/admin/home/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/admin/layout.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/admin/rider-logs/page.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/admin/schedule/page.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/agency/home/agency-page.module.scss(1 hunks)src/app/agency/home/page.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/api/auth/[...all]/route.ts(1 hunks)src/app/complete-registration/page.module.scss(0 hunks)src/app/complete-registration/page.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/driver/home/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/login/page.tsx(0 hunks)src/app/page.tsx(3 hunks)src/app/style-guide/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/bell.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/calendar.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/call.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/check.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/chevron.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/clock.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/cross.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/edit.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/face.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/grid.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/home.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/location.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/plus.tsx(1 hunks)src/assets/icons/user.tsx(1 hunks)src/env.js(0 hunks)src/lib/auth-client.ts(0 hunks)src/lib/auth-helpers.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/auth.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/emails.ts(0 hunks)src/server/api/root.ts(1 hunks)src/server/api/routers/organizations.ts(0 hunks)src/server/api/routers/trip.ts(1 hunks)src/server/api/trpc.ts(2 hunks)src/server/db/auth-schema.ts(1 hunks)src/server/db/booking-schema.ts(1 hunks)src/server/db/index.ts(2 hunks)src/server/db/passenger-schema.ts(1 hunks)src/trpc/query-client.ts(1 hunks)src/trpc/react.tsx(1 hunks)src/types/types.ts(1 hunks)src/types/validation.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (22)
- src/app/admin/rider-logs/page.tsx
- src/app/_components/common/emails/emails.module.scss
- src/app/admin/schedule/page.tsx
- src/app/complete-registration/page.tsx
- src/app/_components/admincomponents/invite-user-form.tsx
- src/lib/auth-client.ts
- src/app/_components/common/emails/register-account.tsx
- src/app/_components/admincomponents/invite-user-form.module.scss
- src/app/_components/admincomponents/test/adminbutton.tsx
- src/app/admin/layout.tsx
- src/app/_components/calendar-view.module.scss
- src/app/admin/driver-logs/page.tsx
- src/app/_components/admincomponents/admin-dashboard.tsx
- src/app/login/page.tsx
- src/app/admin/admin-layout.module.scss
- src/types/validation.ts
- src/app/complete-registration/page.module.scss
- drizzle/0001_left_firebrand.sql
- src/env.js
- src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx
- src/lib/emails.ts
- src/server/api/routers/organizations.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (18)
src/server/db/passenger-schema.ts (2)
src/server/db/booking-schema.ts (1)
bookings(5-29)src/server/db/schema.ts (1)
submittedBy(15-20)
src/app/_components/mantinetest.tsx (1)
src/app/_components/common/button/Button.tsx (1)
Button(41-80)
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx (2)
src/types/types.ts (1)
ViewMode(31-31)src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx (3)
CalendarView(304-456)CalendarViewProps(298-302)transformBookingsToEvents(310-310)
drizzle/0000_long_ikaris.sql (1)
src/server/db/schema.ts (1)
submittedBy(15-20)
src/app/_components/Button.tsx (1)
src/app/_components/common/button/Button.tsx (2)
Button(41-80)ButtonProps(9-23)
src/server/db/booking-schema.ts (1)
src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx (1)
transformBookingsToEvents(52-71)
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/view-controller.tsx (1)
src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx (3)
CalendarView(304-456)CalendarViewProps(298-302)calendarApi(327-329)
src/server/api/trpc.ts (1)
src/types/types.ts (1)
ADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES(3-3)
src/app/style-guide/page.tsx (3)
src/app/_components/common/button/Button.tsx (2)
Button(41-80)ButtonProps(9-23)src/app/_components/common/button/IconButton.tsx (2)
IconButton(30-58)IconButtonProps(7-17)src/app/_components/common/modal/modal.tsx (1)
Modal(23-68)
src/app/agency/home/page.tsx (2)
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx (1)
AgencyInteractiveArea(17-107)src/types/types.ts (1)
ViewMode(31-31)
src/app/admin/home/page.tsx (3)
src/lib/auth-helpers.ts (1)
requireRole(25-34)src/trpc/react.tsx (1)
api(25-25)src/app/admin/layout.tsx (1)
AdminLayout(7-19)
src/app/page.tsx (4)
src/app/_components/testform.tsx (1)
LatestForm(8-57)src/app/_components/segmentedControlTest.tsx (1)
SegmentedControlTest(10-132)src/app/_components/testnotificationbutton.tsx (1)
TestNotificationButton(6-19)src/app/_components/common/modal/modaltests.tsx (1)
ModalTests(20-309)
src/app/_components/common/modal/modaltests.tsx (1)
src/app/_components/common/modal/modal.tsx (1)
Modal(23-68)
src/types/types.ts (2)
src/app/_components/admincomponents/invite-user-form.tsx (1)
InviteUserForm(8-12)src/app/_components/calendar-view.tsx (1)
transformBookingsToEvents(52-71)
src/app/_components/navbar.tsx (2)
src/app/_components/Button.tsx (1)
Button(38-73)src/app/_components/common/button/Button.tsx (2)
Button(41-80)ButtonProps(9-23)
src/server/db/auth-schema.ts (1)
src/server/db/schema.ts (2)
submittedBy(15-20)user(11-11)
src/app/driver/home/page.tsx (1)
src/lib/auth-helpers.ts (1)
requireRole(25-34)
src/lib/auth.ts (1)
src/server/api/routers/organizations.ts (1)
auth(184-191)
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
.env.example
[warning] 18-18: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
(EndingBlankLine)
🔇 Additional comments (44)
.gitignore (1)
13-13: Good: Ignoring local Supabase configuration.Adding
/supabaseto the database section is appropriate and prevents local development configuration and state from being committed. This aligns well with the passenger management schema additions mentioned in the PR objectives..github/CODEOWNERS (1)
1-1:⚠️ Critical inconsistency between PR objectives and AI summary—requires clarification.The PR objectives describe adding a passenger management system (schema, join table, drizzle config, migrations), but the AI summary describes removing organization/invitation features, email capabilities, and dependencies. These are contradictory narratives.
Additionally, the CODEOWNERS change removes the PR author (
wesleylui) and two other reviewers (Lujarios,jason-duong4509) from the owners list, which is counterintuitive for a PR that's supposedly adding new passenger management features authored bywesleylui.Please clarify:
- What is the actual scope of this PR? Is it adding passenger management or removing organization features?
- Why are
wesleyluiand the other two reviewers being removed from CODEOWNERS?- Can you provide the full set of changed files (the passenger schema, join table, drizzle config, and migration files mentioned in the PR objectives)?
README.md (1)
1-10: Inconsistency between AI summary and provided README changes.The AI-generated summary claims the document "notes: removal of the global BetterAuth schema generation step," but no such note appears in the provided README changes. BetterAuth is still listed in the stack (line 6), and there is no mention of schema generation removal.
Please clarify: Is the BetterAuth schema generation removal documented elsewhere in the README, or should this be added as a note?
.env.example (1)
1-18: Removal of environment variables is complete and consistent.Verification confirms:
- No references to
RESEND_API_KEYorNEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URLexist in the codebase (comprehensive grep across .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx, .json files returned no matches)src/env.jsschema has been updated to exclude these variables; onlyBETTER_AUTH_URL,BETTER_AUTH_SECRET,DATABASE_URL, andNODE_ENVremain defined.env.examplereflects the same set of variables- No orphaned dependencies or initialization logic expects these variables
The removal is clean and poses no risk to application stability.
src/app/_components/fullcalendartest.tsx (1)
1-27: PR objectives describe database schema changes, but this file contains only UI component changes.The PR objectives mention implementing passenger management schemas, Booking-Passenger join tables, and SQL migrations. However, this file is a FullCalendar test component with no database-related changes. Please verify that the correct files are included in this review or update the PR description to match the actual scope of changes.
src/assets/icons/edit.tsx (1)
2-2: Import reordering and type-only usage look goodKeeping the type-only
SVGPropsimport after the value import is fine and has no behavioral impact; this remains a clean, idiomatic setup for the SVG component.src/assets/icons/cross.tsx (1)
2-2: Consistent, safe import orderingThe type-only
SVGPropsimport placement is consistent with the other icons and does not change runtime behavior. Looks good.src/assets/icons/user.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM on type-only importUsing a type-only import for
SVGPropshere is correct and keeps the module’s runtime surface minimal; no concerns.src/assets/icons/grid.tsx (1)
2-2: Import style is consistent and non-breakingThe type-only
SVGPropsimport after the value import is a harmless style tweak and matches the other icon components.src/assets/icons/bell.tsx (1)
2-2: Type-only SVGProps import change is fineThis import reordering / type-only usage is consistent with the pattern across the icons and does not alter behavior.
src/assets/icons/calendar.tsx (1)
2-2: Clean, consistent type-only importThe updated
SVGPropsimport is purely stylistic and consistent with other icons; no functional concerns here.src/assets/icons/check.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.The reordering of type-only imports after runtime imports is a valid style convention with no functional impact.
1-38: Significant inconsistency between PR objectives and AI summary.The PR title and objectives describe adding a passenger management system with database schemas, but the AI-generated summary describes removing organization/invitation features, simplifying authentication, and removing dependencies. These descriptions are completely contradictory. The icon files being reviewed show only minor import reordering and don't relate to either description.
src/assets/icons/call.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/location.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/face.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/clock.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/plus.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/chevron.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/assets/icons/home.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import order standardized.Consistent with the pattern applied across other icon components.
src/app/agency/home/agency-page.module.scss (1)
6-40: LGTM!The header styling provides a clean, well-structured layout with semantic grouping for left/right controls, icon placeholders, and avatar styling.
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-form.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM!The migration from Box to Mantine's Title component for section headings is a clean presentational improvement with proper semantic HTML structure.
Also applies to: 25-27, 64-66
src/app/agency/home/page.tsx (1)
5-5: Component rename looks good.The transition from
BookingInteractiveAreatoAgencyInteractiveAreaaligns with the agency-specific refactoring.Also applies to: 21-21
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.tsx (2)
94-96: LGTM!The Title component usage for the modal heading provides better semantic structure and aligns with Mantine best practices.
78-78: The review comment is incorrect; the placeholder is intentional scaffolding, not a regression.The review claims that "CalendarView implementation" was replaced with placeholder text. However, verification shows:
- CalendarView does not exist in the codebase — no matches found across the repository
- The placeholder predates this PR — git history confirms the identical placeholder code existed in the previous commit (d70d1e3)
- This is intentional scaffolding — the component has other WIP comments (e.g., line 23 mentions eventual replacement with tanstack mutation), indicating active development structure
- A separate test calendar exists —
fullcalendartest.tsxis present but unrelated to this componentThe code at line 78 is a conditional rendering scaffold awaiting implementation, not a functional component being replaced.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/app/_components/agencycomponents/view-controller.tsx (1)
52-54: Verify the intention behind the date navigation removal.The regression is confirmed: chevrons at lines 52-54 are static UI elements with no onClick handlers, and the
ViewControllerPropsinterface (lines 27-31) contains no date-related parameters (currentDate,onDateChange,isDayView). No code comments explain whether this is intentional work-in-progress or an incomplete refactor.Clarify:
- Is this intentional architectural simplification, or incomplete implementation?
- If intentional, document the plan and timeline for restoring navigation functionality
- If incomplete, restore the date navigation logic or mark as WIP with a tracking issue reference
src/app/layout.tsx (1)
8-11: LGTM.Import reordering doesn't affect functionality.
src/app/style-guide/page.tsx (1)
8-9: LGTM.Import path updates align with the component refactor, and all Button usages correctly use the
textprop.src/app/page.tsx (1)
1-114: Unable to fully verify PR scope — branch state is unclearThe passenger schema file exists in the codebase, but the git state is inconclusive. The branch appears to be synced with or already merged into main, making it impossible to determine the full PR scope via git commands.
What I can confirm:
src/server/db/passenger-schema.tsexists with passengers table and booking_passengers join table- This file was added in a previous commit (34a20ab), not modified in this PR
- The reviewed file (
src/app/page.tsx) contains only UI/test components, not passenger management codeThe original review's concern about scope mismatch is partially supported: the single reviewed file is unrelated to passenger management. However, I cannot verify whether:
- Other passenger-related files were modified in this PR
- Additional schema or database files are included
- The full change set matches the PR objectives
Recommendation: Verify the PR scope manually on GitHub by checking the full list of modified files and commit messages to confirm whether passenger management changes are present beyond the single reviewed file.
src/app/admin/home/page.tsx (1)
8-8: The tRPC router pathapi.form.hellois correctly configured and verified.Verification confirms:
formRouteris properly imported and registered inappRouterunder theformkey (line 10 ofsrc/server/api/root.ts)- The
helloprocedure exists informRouterand accepts{ text: string }input- The call
api.form.hello({ text: "from tRPC" })matches the correct canonical routing path and input schemaThe code structure is technically sound. The placeholder nature of this test endpoint (noted by the reviewer) is evident from the implementation, but the router path itself is valid and operational.
src/app/api/auth/[...all]/route.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM!The import reordering is a non-functional change that maintains correct behavior while improving code organization.
src/app/driver/home/page.tsx (1)
1-26: LGTM!The migration from
Role.ADMIN/Role.AGENCYenum values to string literals"admin"/"agency"correctly aligns with the type system refactor in the codebase. The implementation is correct and maintains the same authorization logic.biome.jsonc (1)
1-36: LGTM!The configuration changes correctly adapt to Biome 1.9.4's schema:
- Schema reference updated from 2.3.5 to 1.9.4
organizeImportsmoved from nestedassist.actions.sourceto top-level (matching 1.9.4 schema structure)- Files configuration updated appropriately
These changes align with the Biome version downgrade in package.json.
src/lib/auth.ts (1)
1-31: Organization-related code has been successfully removed.Verification confirms all organization-related code has been fully removed from the codebase:
- No organization router references found
- No organization schema references in src/server/db/
- No organization UI components found
- auth-schema.ts contains only user, session, account, and verification tables—no organization, member, or invitation tables
The auth configuration changes are complete.
.github/workflows/lintandbuild.yml (2)
33-33: No changes needed—string handling is already correct.The code at
src/env.js:39uses!!process.env.SKIP_ENV_VALIDATIONto convert the string environment variable to a boolean. This correctly handles the string'true'by treating any non-empty string as truthy, which aligns with the review comment's own recommendation to avoid strict boolean comparison.
18-18: Let me verify Node 20 compatibility for the remaining critical dependencies:No compatibility issues identified—Node.js 20 is supported by all project dependencies.
Node-postgres (pg 8.16.3) is compatible with Node 20.x. Next.js 15.2.3 supports Node versions ^18.18.0 || ^19.8.0 || >= 20.0.0, and React 19.0.0 has no restrictive Node constraints. All other key dependencies in the project (better-auth, @Mantine packages, postgres driver, and @types/node ^20.14.10) are compatible with Node 20. The downgrade from Node 22 to Node 20 is safe and aligns with the explicit @types/node version already pinned in package.json.
package.json (2)
1-71: All removed packages have been successfully eliminated from the codebase.Verification confirms:
@react-email/components,resend, anddotenvhave no remaining references in source codetsxis not used in any scripts or dependencies- The
uuidreferences found are PostgreSQL data type usage through drizzle-orm, not the removed npm packageNo further action required.
49-49: No issues found — biome.jsonc is already compatible with version 1.9.4.The configuration schema already references 1.9.4, uses the pre-2.x
"ignore"format (not the newer"includes"from version 2.x), and theorganizeImportsstructure is simple and compatible. CI commands (biome ciandbiome check) use standard flags with no version-specific parameters, ensuring compatibility with 1.9.4.drizzle.config.ts (1)
1-17: Passenger schema correctly wired into Drizzle configIncluding
"./src/server/db/passenger-schema.ts"in theschemaarray is the right way to make the new passenger and booking‑passenger tables part of Drizzle’s migrations/introspection. Theenvimport usage anddbCredentials.urllook consistent with the existing setup.No issues from a config standpoint.
src/server/api/routers/trip.ts (1)
3-27: Trip creation still correctly restricted to admin/agency roles
createremains wrapped inadminProcedure, so with the updatedadminProcedurelogic this endpoint is accessible only to users whoseroleis inADMIN_PROCEDURE_ROLES(currently"admin"and"agency"). The payload written tobookings(title, locations,passengerInfo,agencyId,purpose,createdBy) matches the SQL schema in0000_long_ikaris.sql.No functional issues here; it’s ready to be extended later to hook into the structured passenger tables if needed.
src/lib/auth-helpers.ts (1)
1-2: Type-only imports look goodUsing
type Sessionandtype Rolekeeps runtime bundle clean while preserving typing; no behavioral change here.src/server/db/index.ts (1)
3-21: Passenger schema integration intodbis consistentIncluding
...passengerSchemaalongside existingschemaandauthSchemafollows the established pattern and exposes the new tables/relations through the shareddbinstance as expected.src/server/api/root.ts (1)
3-13: Relative import fortripRouteris fineSwitching to
"./routers/trip"is consistent with colocated router structure and shouldn’t affect the app router’s behavior.src/server/db/passenger-schema.ts (1)
6-34: Schema aligns with migration; join-table structure looks goodThe
passengersandbookingPassengersdefinitions (columns, types, cascade behavior, timestamps) match the SQL migration and fit the intended many‑to‑many relationship between bookings and passengers.
| # Supabase | ||
| DATABASE_URL= | ||
|
|
||
| # Resend | ||
| RESEND_API_KEY= | ||
|
|
||
| # Other | ||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL= | ||
| DATABASE_URL= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a blank line at end of file.
Configuration files should end with a newline for consistency and to comply with standard file conventions.
# Supabase
DATABASE_URL=
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Supabase | |
| DATABASE_URL= | |
| # Resend | |
| RESEND_API_KEY= | |
| # Other | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL= | |
| \ No newline at end of file | |
| DATABASE_URL= | |
| # Supabase | |
| DATABASE_URL= | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
[warning] 18-18: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
(EndingBlankLine)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.env.example around lines 17-18: the file is missing a trailing newline; add a
single blank line (newline character) at the end of the file so the file ends
with a newline character to comply with POSIX/text file conventions.
| CREATE TABLE "booking_passengers" ( | ||
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | ||
| "booking_id" integer NOT NULL, | ||
| "passenger_id" integer NOT NULL, | ||
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL | ||
| ); | ||
| --> statement-breakpoint | ||
| CREATE TABLE "passengers" ( | ||
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | ||
| "name" text NOT NULL, | ||
| "email" text NOT NULL, | ||
| "phone" text, | ||
| "notes" text, | ||
| "emergency_contact_name" text, | ||
| "emergency_contact_phone" text, | ||
| "emergency_contact_relation" text, | ||
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | ||
| "updated_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | ||
| CONSTRAINT "passengers_email_unique" UNIQUE("email") | ||
| ); | ||
| --> statement-breakpoint | ||
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_bookings_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("booking_id") REFERENCES "public"."bookings"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action;--> statement-breakpoint | ||
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_passenger_id_passengers_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("passenger_id") REFERENCES "public"."passengers"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action; No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Add integrity and index constraints to the join table
As written, booking_passengers allows duplicate (booking_id, passenger_id) rows and has no explicit indexes on its foreign keys. For a typical many‑to‑many join, that’s usually undesirable and can hurt performance.
Consider enforcing uniqueness and adding indexes, e.g.:
CREATE TABLE "booking_passengers" (
"id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"booking_id" integer NOT NULL,
"passenger_id" integer NOT NULL,
"created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL
);
--> statement-breakpoint
+ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers"
+ ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_passenger_id_unique"
+ UNIQUE ("booking_id", "passenger_id");
+--> statement-breakpoint
+CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_booking_id_idx"
+ ON "booking_passengers" ("booking_id");
+--> statement-breakpoint
+CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_passenger_id_idx"
+ ON "booking_passengers" ("passenger_id");
+--> statement-breakpointI need to verify the assumptions in the review comment about database best practices. Let me search for information on this:
🌐 Web query:
PostgreSQL foreign key auto index creation
💡 Result:
Short answer: PostgreSQL does NOT automatically create an index on the referencing (child) column(s) when you add a FOREIGN KEY. It only automatically creates indexes for PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints on the referenced table. If you need fast joins or fast FK-checks during DELETE/UPDATE of the parent, create the index yourself (or use CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY to avoid long locks). [1][2]
Example:
- add a simple index:
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_orders_customer_id ON orders(customer_id); - for composite FKs, index the same column order as the FK:
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_items_order_product ON items(order_id, product_id);
References:
- PostgreSQL docs: foreign-key/constraints discussion (explains referenced side is indexed but referencing side is not auto-indexed). [1]
- Community/QA explaining behavior and recommendation to create indexes on FK columns. [2]
🌐 Web query:
many-to-many join table unique constraint best practice
💡 Result:
Short answer — enforce uniqueness on the pair (and use DB features to avoid races).
Best-practice checklist
- Enforce a uniqueness constraint on the two foreign-key columns (either UNIQUE(left_id, right_id) or make them the composite PRIMARY KEY). This prevents duplicate links at the storage level. [1][2]
- Add foreign-key constraints on both columns so referential integrity is guaranteed. [1]
- If the join row has no payload (just the relationship), prefer a composite PK (no surrogate id). If the join row carries additional attributes (created_at, role, metadata), using a surrogate id + UNIQUE(left_id, right_id) is fine. [3]
- Create supporting indexes if you need fast lookups in either direction (index the individual FK columns). The unique constraint creates one index for enforcement; add others only if query patterns need them. [1][3]
- Use DB-side upserts/“insert ... on conflict” or MERGE to safely insert without races (or wrap in transactions/locking when updating). ON CONFLICT requires a unique/indexed constraint to target. [1][4][5]
- For soft-deletes, use a partial/filtered unique index (e.g., WHERE deleted_at IS NULL) so uniqueness applies only to active rows. Implement clear rules for re-creating “deleted” links. [2][4]
- Prefer enforcing business rules in the DB (constraints, triggers) rather than only in app code — it’s the single source of truth and prevents concurrency bugs. [1][4]
Quick examples (Postgres)
- No payload, composite PK:
CREATE TABLE user_group (user_id bigint NOT NULL, group_id bigint NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (user_id, group_id)); - With payload, surrogate id + unique pair:
CREATE TABLE user_group (id serial PRIMARY KEY, user_id bigint NOT NULL, group_id bigint NOT NULL, UNIQUE (user_id, group_id)); - Upsert:
INSERT INTO user_group (user_id, group_id) VALUES (1,2) ON CONFLICT (user_id, group_id) DO NOTHING;
Sources
- Postgres/Timescale docs on UNIQUE/PK and ON CONFLICT. [1]
- DBA/StackOverflow threads on ON CONFLICT requiring a unique/indexed constraint and avoiding duplicate rows. [2][4]
- Design guidance (composite PK vs surrogate id) and practical upsert examples. [3][5]
🌐 Web query:
Drizzle ORM many-to-many join table conventions
💡 Result:
Short summary of Drizzle ORM many‑to‑many conventions
- You must define an explicit junction (join) table that stores the associations (Drizzle does not auto-create through tables). [1][2]
- Common naming convention used in docs/community: use a join name like To (e.g. usersToChatGroups). Tables themselves are usually plural (users, chat_groups). [2][3]
- Define foreign keys on the junction table to each side (userId, groupId) and enforce uniqueness with either a composite primary key (primaryKey(...) operator) or a unique constraint to avoid duplicate links. [1][4]
- Declare relations with relations(...): each main table uses many(junctionTable) and the junction table defines one(...) relations back to each main table. Use relationName when you have multiple relations between the same two tables to disambiguate. [1][2]
References
- Drizzle relations docs. [1]
- Drizzle joins / many‑to‑many example (usersToChatGroups). [2]
- Community/guide naming recommendation (usersToCourses style). [3]
- Indexes & composite primaryKey docs (primaryKey operator). [4]
Add integrity and index constraints to the join table
As written, booking_passengers allows duplicate (booking_id, passenger_id) rows and has no explicit indexes on its foreign keys. For a typical many‑to‑many join, that's usually undesirable and can hurt performance.
Consider enforcing uniqueness and adding indexes, e.g.:
CREATE TABLE "booking_passengers" (
"id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
"booking_id" integer NOT NULL,
"passenger_id" integer NOT NULL,
"created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL
);
--> statement-breakpoint
+ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers"
+ ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_passenger_id_unique"
+ UNIQUE ("booking_id", "passenger_id");
+--> statement-breakpoint
+CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_booking_id_idx"
+ ON "booking_passengers" ("booking_id");
+--> statement-breakpoint
+CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_passenger_id_idx"
+ ON "booking_passengers" ("passenger_id");
+--> statement-breakpoint📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| CREATE TABLE "booking_passengers" ( | |
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | |
| "booking_id" integer NOT NULL, | |
| "passenger_id" integer NOT NULL, | |
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL | |
| ); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| CREATE TABLE "passengers" ( | |
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | |
| "name" text NOT NULL, | |
| "email" text NOT NULL, | |
| "phone" text, | |
| "notes" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_name" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_phone" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_relation" text, | |
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | |
| "updated_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | |
| CONSTRAINT "passengers_email_unique" UNIQUE("email") | |
| ); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_bookings_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("booking_id") REFERENCES "public"."bookings"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action;--> statement-breakpoint | |
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_passenger_id_passengers_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("passenger_id") REFERENCES "public"."passengers"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action; | |
| CREATE TABLE "booking_passengers" ( | |
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | |
| "booking_id" integer NOT NULL, | |
| "passenger_id" integer NOT NULL, | |
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL | |
| ); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" | |
| ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_passenger_id_unique" | |
| UNIQUE ("booking_id", "passenger_id"); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_booking_id_idx" | |
| ON "booking_passengers" ("booking_id"); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| CREATE INDEX "booking_passengers_passenger_id_idx" | |
| ON "booking_passengers" ("passenger_id"); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| CREATE TABLE "passengers" ( | |
| "id" serial PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | |
| "name" text NOT NULL, | |
| "email" text NOT NULL, | |
| "phone" text, | |
| "notes" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_name" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_phone" text, | |
| "emergency_contact_relation" text, | |
| "created_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | |
| "updated_at" timestamp DEFAULT now() NOT NULL, | |
| CONSTRAINT "passengers_email_unique" UNIQUE("email") | |
| ); | |
| --> statement-breakpoint | |
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_booking_id_bookings_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("booking_id") REFERENCES "public"."bookings"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action;--> statement-breakpoint | |
| ALTER TABLE "booking_passengers" ADD CONSTRAINT "booking_passengers_passenger_id_passengers_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("passenger_id") REFERENCES "public"."passengers"("id") ON DELETE cascade ON UPDATE no action; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In drizzle/0001_tough_drax.sql lines 1-23 the join table booking_passengers
lacks a uniqueness constraint on (booking_id, passenger_id) and has no indexes
on its foreign key columns; add a UNIQUE constraint on (booking_id,
passenger_id) to prevent duplicate relationships and create separate indexes on
booking_id and passenger_id (or a composite index depending on query patterns)
to improve FK lookups and join performance, ensuring index and constraint names
follow project conventions and are added after the table creation but before or
alongside the existing FK ALTER statements.
| yarn db:generate:local | ||
|
|
||
| # 3. Apply migration to your personal Supabase database | ||
| yarn db:migrate | ||
| yarn db:migrate:local |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify that the new environment-specific commands match package.json scripts.
The documentation correctly updates to environment-specific database commands (db:generate:local, db:migrate:local, db:migrate:dev, db:migrate:prod). Ensure these scripts are defined in package.json and the workflow accurately reflects the actual tooling setup.
Also applies to: 154-156, 166-166, 173-173
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all referenced database commands exist in package.json
# Search for db:generate, db:migrate commands in package.json
rg -A 1 '"db:' package.json || echo "No db commands found in package.json"Length of output: 188
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all package.json files in the repo and look for db: commands with environment suffixes
echo "=== Looking for all db: commands across all package.json files ==="
fd -n "package.json" -x grep -l '"db:' {} \;
echo ""
echo "=== Checking for environment-specific db commands (db:generate:local, db:migrate:dev, etc) ==="
rg '"db:(generate|migrate):(local|dev|prod)' --type json || echo "No environment-specific db commands found"Length of output: 435
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all drizzle.config files to understand environment configuration
echo "=== Finding all drizzle config files ==="
fd -n "drizzle.config" -type f
echo ""
echo "=== Checking if db:migrate:* or db:generate:* scripts exist anywhere ==="
rg '"db:(generate|migrate):(local|dev|prod)"' --type json
echo ""
echo "=== Checking entire package.json for all db scripts ==="
cat package.json | grep -A 50 '"db'Length of output: 2096
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find drizzle config files and check actual database setup
echo "=== Finding drizzle.config files ==="
find . -name "drizzle.config.*" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -20
echo ""
echo "=== Checking content of drizzle.config to understand environment setup ==="
find . -name "drizzle.config.*" -type f 2>/dev/null | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | head -100
echo ""
echo "=== Verify complete package.json scripts section ==="
grep -A 20 '"scripts"' package.jsonLength of output: 1389
The README documents npm scripts that do not exist in package.json.
The README instructs users to run yarn db:generate:local, yarn db:migrate:local, yarn db:migrate:dev, and yarn db:migrate:prod (lines 138, 141, 166, 173), but package.json only contains db:generate and db:migrate without environment-specific variants. This will cause "command not found" errors when users follow the documented workflow.
The codebase uses a single drizzle.config.ts with environment-based DATABASE_URL from environment variables, not separate npm scripts for each environment. Either update the README to reflect the actual commands (yarn db:generate, yarn db:migrate), or add the environment-specific scripts to package.json with appropriate --config flags if multi-environment Drizzle configs are planned.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 138 to 141, the documented commands (yarn
db:generate:local and yarn db:migrate:local) do not exist in package.json and
will cause "command not found" errors; either update the README to instruct
users to run the actual scripts (yarn db:generate and yarn db:migrate) and note
that environment selection is driven by DATABASE_URL env vars in
drizzle.config.ts, or add environment-specific scripts to package.json (e.g.,
db:generate:local, db:migrate:local, db:migrate:dev, db:migrate:prod) that wrap
the existing commands and set the appropriate env or config flags; pick one
approach and make README and package.json consistent.
| border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; | ||
| border-radius: 0.5rem; | ||
| overflow: hidden; | ||
| // temporary height for look | ||
| height: 68vh; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Address temporary styling before merge.
The comment indicates this height value is temporary. Hardcoded viewport heights can cause layout issues across different screen sizes and should be replaced with a more flexible approach.
Consider using a dynamic height solution or clarify the final intended height before merging.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check current state of the SCSS file and surrounding context
cat src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.module.scss | head -20Length of output: 210
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any TODO or temporary markers related to height or this component
rg -n "temporary|TODO|FIXME" src/app/_components/agencycomponents/ -C 2Length of output: 945
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this component is referenced elsewhere and how it's used
rg -n "agency-interactive-area" src/ --type=ts --type=tsx --type=js --type=jsx -C 1Length of output: 27
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the component is referenced (fixing file type syntax)
rg -n "agency-interactive-area" src/ -C 1Length of output: 549
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any recent commits or context about this temporary styling
rg -n "calendarContainer" src/ -C 2Length of output: 1217
Replace hardcoded temporary height with flexible sizing solution.
The temporary styling flagged in the review is still present. The hardcoded height: 68vh on .calendarContainer (line 6) causes inflexible layout and will break responsiveness across different screen sizes. This pattern is also duplicated in view-controller.module.scss (line 44).
Replace the viewport-relative height with one of:
min-heightwith appropriate fallbackflexlayout constraints- Content-driven sizing
- CSS
vh-independent responsive units
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/app/_components/agencycomponents/agency-interactive-area.module.scss
around lines 2 to 6, the rule setting a hardcoded temporary height (height:
68vh) on .calendarContainer makes the layout inflexible; replace it with a
responsive approach by removing the fixed height and using one of: set a
min-height (with sensible fallback), use flexbox (e.g., allow .calendarContainer
to flex: 1 inside a parent column flex container), or rely on content-driven
sizing with max-height and overflow for scrollable content; ensure the same
change is applied to view-controller.module.scss line 44, and test across
breakpoints to confirm the component grows/shrinks responsively.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| @use "@/styles/variables" as *; | |||
| @import "@/styles/variables"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Use modern @use instead of deprecated @import.
Sass deprecated @import in favor of @use (2019+). The @use directive provides better namespacing, avoids global pollution, and is the recommended approach.
Revert to the modern syntax:
-@import "@/styles/variables";
+@use "@/styles/variables" as *;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @import "@/styles/variables"; | |
| @use "@/styles/variables" as *; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/app/_components/Button.module.scss lines 1–1, the file uses the
deprecated Sass @import; replace it with the modern @use syntax (e.g., @use
"@/styles/variables" [as variables] or @use "@/styles/variables" as *). If you
keep a namespace, prefix any references to variables/mixins with that namespace
(variables.$name or variables.mixin()), or if you use "as *" leave existing
references unchanged; update the file accordingly and remove the @import line.
| <Button text="Rider Logs" variant="secondary" /> | ||
| <Button text="Vehicle Log" variant="secondary" /> | ||
| <Button text="Schedule" variant="secondary" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Navigation broken—Buttons replaced Links without navigation logic.
Lines 32-34 replaced Link-wrapped navigation with Button components that have no onClick handlers. These buttons are now non-functional and won't navigate users anywhere.
Restore navigation using Link components or add onClick handlers:
+import Link from "next/link";
+
{view === "admin" && (
<Group gap={20}>
- <Button text="Rider Logs" variant="secondary" />
- <Button text="Vehicle Log" variant="secondary" />
- <Button text="Schedule" variant="secondary" />
+ <Link href="/admin/rider-logs">
+ <Button text="Rider Logs" variant="secondary" />
+ </Link>
+ <Link href="/admin/vehicle-log">
+ <Button text="Vehicle Log" variant="secondary" />
+ </Link>
+ <Link href="/admin/schedule">
+ <Button text="Schedule" variant="secondary" />
+ </Link>
<User />
</Group>
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Button text="Rider Logs" variant="secondary" /> | |
| <Button text="Vehicle Log" variant="secondary" /> | |
| <Button text="Schedule" variant="secondary" /> | |
| import Link from "next/link"; | |
| {view === "admin" && ( | |
| <Group gap={20}> | |
| <Link href="/admin/rider-logs"> | |
| <Button text="Rider Logs" variant="secondary" /> | |
| </Link> | |
| <Link href="/admin/vehicle-log"> | |
| <Button text="Vehicle Log" variant="secondary" /> | |
| </Link> | |
| <Link href="/admin/schedule"> | |
| <Button text="Schedule" variant="secondary" /> | |
| </Link> | |
| <User /> | |
| </Group> | |
| )} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/app/_components/navbar.tsx around lines 32 to 34, the Link-based
navigation was replaced by plain Button components so the "Rider Logs", "Vehicle
Log", and "Schedule" controls no longer navigate. Restore navigation by either
wrapping each Button in the original Link component (pointing to the correct
route paths) or add an onClick that calls the router navigation (e.g.,
router.push('/path')) for each button; ensure accessibility by keeping hrefs or
using role and keyboard handlers if using onClick. Make sure route paths match
the app routes and remove any unused imports after the change.
|
|
||
| export default async function AdminHome() { | ||
| const _hello = await api.form.hello({ text: "from tRPC" }); | ||
| const session = await requireRole(["admin"]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type error: Use Role enum instead of string literal.
Line 6 passes ["admin"] as a string literal, but requireRole expects Role[] enum values. This will cause a TypeScript error.
Apply this diff:
+import { Role } from "@/types";
+
export default async function AdminHome() {
- const session = await requireRole(["admin"]);
+ const session = await requireRole([Role.ADMIN]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const session = await requireRole(["admin"]); | |
| import { Role } from "@/types"; | |
| export default async function AdminHome() { | |
| const session = await requireRole([Role.ADMIN]); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/app/admin/home/page.tsx around line 6, the call const session = await
requireRole(["admin"]); uses a string literal but requireRole expects Role[];
change the argument to use the Role enum (e.g., requireRole([Role.ADMIN]) or the
correct enum member name), and ensure the Role enum is imported at the top of
the file (add the appropriate import if missing).
| import Bell from "@/assets/icons/bell"; | ||
| import Face from "@/assets/icons/face"; | ||
| import Home from "@/assets/icons/home"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify unused icon imports.
The Bell, Face, and Home icons are imported but not used anywhere in this file.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these icons are used elsewhere in the agency home page or related components
# Search for usage of Bell, Face, and Home icon components
rg -n -C3 '\b(Bell|Face|Home)\b' --type=tsx --type=ts src/app/agency/home/Length of output: 27
I need to correct the script—rg doesn't support --type=tsx. Let me search with proper file patterns:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Bell, Face, and Home usage in the agency/home directory
rg -n -C3 '\b(Bell|Face|Home)\b' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' src/app/agency/home/
# Also check the full page.tsx file to see all content and usages
echo "=== Full page.tsx content ==="
cat src/app/agency/home/page.tsxLength of output: 1303
Let me check if these icons might be expected by the AgencyInteractiveArea component:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Bell, Face, Home icons in the agency-interactive-area component
rg -n '\b(Bell|Face|Home)\b' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' src/app/_components/agencycomponents/
# Also check for any references to these icon filenames
rg -n 'bell|face|home' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' src/app/_components/agencycomponents/ | head -20Length of output: 346
Remove unused icon imports from lines 1-3.
The Bell, Face, and Home icons are imported but never used in this file or passed to any components. They should be removed.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/app/agency/home/page.tsx around lines 1 to 3, the imports for Bell, Face,
and Home are unused; remove those three import statements and ensure no other
code references them so the file compiles without unused import warnings.
| emailAndPassword: { enabled: true }, | ||
| plugins: [nextCookies()], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify password reset functionality after removing custom email handler.
The authentication configuration has been drastically simplified, removing the custom sendResetPassword handler that previously managed invitation and password reset emails via Resend. Ensure that:
- Password reset still works with better-auth's default behavior
- Users can successfully reset their passwords without the custom email flow
- Any UI flows (forgot password pages) are updated to work with the new flow
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for password reset and invitation-related code that may be affected
echo "=== Checking for password reset UI/API usage ==="
rg -n 'resetPassword|reset-password|forgot-password' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' -C 3
echo -e "\n=== Checking for invitation/registration flows ==="
rg -n 'invitation|complete-registration|verifyToken' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' -C 3
echo -e "\n=== Checking for sendResetPassword references ==="
rg -n 'sendResetPassword' -C 3Length of output: 151
I need to gather more context to properly evaluate the review comment. The initial search found no password reset-related code, which is inconclusive. Let me examine the actual auth configuration and search more broadly.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the auth configuration file directly
echo "=== Checking src/lib/auth.ts ==="
cat src/lib/auth.ts
echo -e "\n=== Searching for better-auth config or usage ==="
rg -n 'better-auth|betterAuth' -C 5
echo -e "\n=== Checking for API routes related to auth ==="
fd -e 'ts' -e 'tsx' -path '*/api/*' -o -path '*/route*' | head -20
echo -e "\n=== Searching for resend or email functionality ==="
rg -n 'resend|Resend' -C 3Length of output: 6737
Let me search more thoroughly for password reset UI components and check the entire codebase structure:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for pages/components related to password/reset/auth flows
echo "=== Searching for auth-related pages/components ==="
find . -type f \( -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.ts" \) ! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.next/*" ! -path "*/dist/*" | head -30
echo -e "\n=== Searching for any email or reset related files ==="
find . -type f \( -name "*password*" -o -name "*reset*" -o -name "*forgot*" \) ! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.next/*"
echo -e "\n=== Checking for sendEmail or email configuration ==="
rg -n 'sendEmail|emailConfig|email:' -C 2
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to auth/email ==="
rg -n 'TODO|FIXME|XXX' -C 2 | rg -i 'auth|email|password|reset'Length of output: 3484
I need to understand what better-auth provides by default for password reset functionality:
Password reset functionality is currently non-functional due to missing email handler configuration.
Better-auth requires a sendResetPassword function to be configured in order to handle password resets. The current auth configuration in src/lib/auth.ts has emailAndPassword: { enabled: true } but does not provide a sendResetPassword handler. This means:
- Password reset requests will not send any emails to users
- The forgot password flow cannot be completed
- Users have no way to recover their accounts if they forget their password
Required actions:
- Implement a
sendResetPasswordhandler in the auth configuration (lines 27-28 ofsrc/lib/auth.ts) to send password reset emails - Create a password reset UI page to handle the reset flow
- Ensure the email handler properly generates and sends reset links with tokens
🌐 Web query:
better-auth password reset default behavior version 1.3
💡 Result:
Summary (better-auth v1.3 — default password-reset behavior):
- Requesting a reset: calling requestPasswordReset triggers the configured sendResetPassword callback if the user exists, but the endpoint returns a generic success response even when the email is not found (prevents account enumeration). [1][2]
- Token: a generated token (24‑char ID by default) is stored server‑side and the default expiry is 3600 seconds (1 hour). [1][2]
- Flow: the emailed link points to a reset endpoint that validates the token and redirects to your client with the token in the query string; the client then calls resetPassword (POST) with token + newPassword to complete the change. [1][2]
- Other defaults: reset behavior uses the configured sendResetPassword handler and resetPasswordTokenExpiresIn (default 3600s); sessions/other post‑reset actions follow the library’s email-and-password config (e.g., autoSignIn depends on config). [1]
Sources:
- better-auth docs / configuration & password-reset flow. [1]
- DeepWiki summary of better-auth password-reset implementation (token length, expiry, generic success). [2]
Password reset functionality is non-functional. The sendResetPassword handler must be configured in the auth setup.
Better-auth requires a sendResetPassword function to be configured to enable password resets. The current configuration at src/lib/auth.ts (lines 27-28) has emailAndPassword: { enabled: true } but provides no email handler. Without this:
- Password reset email requests will silently fail—no emails are sent
- Users cannot recover their accounts
- There is also no password reset UI in the codebase to support the flow
Required fixes:
- Add a
sendResetPasswordhandler to the auth configuration (e.g., using Resend or another email service) - Create a password reset page to handle the token validation and password update flow
- Test the complete password reset workflow end-to-end
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/lib/auth.ts around lines 27 to 28, the auth config enables
emailAndPassword but omits the required sendResetPassword handler, so password
reset requests never send emails; add a sendResetPassword function to the auth
configuration that composes and sends a reset link (use your chosen email
provider API, e.g., Resend) including the reset token and a callback URL, ensure
the handler logs failures and returns appropriate errors, then implement a
password reset page/route that reads the token from the URL, validates it with
the auth library, presents a new-password form, calls the API to update the
password, and include end-to-end tests exercising request, email send (mock the
provider), token validation, and password update flows.
| dropoffLocation: text("dropoff_location").notNull(), | ||
| purpose: text("purpose"), | ||
| passengerInfo: text("passenger_info").notNull(), | ||
| passengerInfo: text("passengerInfo").notNull(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix inconsistent database column naming convention.
The field uses camelCase "passengerInfo" as the database column name, while other fields in the same table use snake_case (e.g., "pickup_location" on line 8, "dropoff_location" on line 9). This inconsistency can cause confusion and maintenance issues.
Apply this diff to use consistent snake_case naming:
- passengerInfo: text("passengerInfo").notNull(),
+ passengerInfo: text("passenger_info").notNull(),Also verify that migration SQL files use passenger_info as the column name. If migrations already created a passengerInfo column, you'll need a migration to rename it:
ALTER TABLE bookings RENAME COLUMN "passengerInfo" TO passenger_info;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/server/db/booking-schema.ts around line 11 the column is defined as
passengerInfo which breaks the table's snake_case naming convention; change the
column name to passenger_info to match pickup_location and dropoff_location,
update any references in code/queries to use passenger_info, and check your
migration SQL files—if a migration already created passengerInfo add a new
migration to rename the column (ALTER TABLE bookings RENAME COLUMN
"passengerInfo" TO passenger_info) and run DB migration tests.
|
@wesleylui not really sure what happened to this branch... maybe reset off main |
|
^^ what burton said.. ts blew up fr |
Add passenger management schema with contact information.
Passengers table includes:
Also did:
passenger-schematodrizzle.config.tsThe /drizzle SQL files:
0000_long_ikaris.sqlneeded for my local supabase instance0000_tough_drax.sqlcontains passenger schema sqlSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactoring
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.