Conversation
Expands the bound entitlements section to address customer confusion: - Explains what bound entitlements do and don't do (key distinction: visibility layer, not provisioning) - Adds system-managed vs manual binding types - Provides concrete use cases (role hierarchies, cross-app dependencies, nested groups) - Clarifies access review behavior with derived access Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation for entitlement relationship tooling was expanded with a new "How bound entitlements work" section, including definitions, usage examples, provisioning behavior notes, and clarified step-by-step setup instructions with refined wording throughout. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@OneWhoNests @harikac1 Here's an updated draft of the entitlement bindings doc, integrating a pared-down version of the info Nestor sent me. Can you please give this a quick review and flag anything that you think we still need to change/update/expand to help customers understand bound entitlements? Many thanks. |
Summary
Expands documentation for bound entitlements to address customer confusion about what they do and don't do.
Changes
New sections added:
Updated:
Preserved:
What was cut from the source material
The source material included implementation details (DAG structure, uplift process, delegated provisioning internals, API examples, glossary) that aren't necessary for customers to understand how to use the feature.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit